• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cam specs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobain03
  • Start date Start date Nov 8, 2005

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#1
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #1
whats the specs on a stock 289 cam? non hi po.

would switching to a edelbrock performer cam be that much difference?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 8, 2005
#2
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #2
I do not recall the specs offhand but I was AMAZED at how tame they were. IIRC the duration at 50 was around 180-190 for the C-code and lift was about 0.4...simply pathetic!

So yeah, the regular performer cam, although considered an RV grind, WILL wake it up quite a bit, particularly with a decent intake and some small-primary headers.
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#3
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #3
i have a performer intake as well as tri y's. if the cam would be a good choice then i might as well get the edelbrock performer heads too.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 8, 2005
#4
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #4
If you are willing to spend the money for the heads I'd suggest getting the "RPM" versions.

Edelbrock claims 367fwhp with a 5.0 and the RPM treatment. That is almost twice the stock power
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#5
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #5
how would the rpm heads work with the regualr intake and cam?
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Nov 8, 2005
#6
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #6
The stock cam is .368/.381 lift, 184/189 dur. & 109LSA. Teeny Tiny! If you want to make power, ditch the Performer intake. A PerfRPM (or a Wieland Stealth), a set of 1.9/1.6 valved PerformerRPM heads and a Comp XE-series cam would do nicely.
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#7
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #7
keep in mind this car is driven alot! i dont want it stalling at a stoplight (3 speed auto tranny).
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Nov 8, 2005
#8
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #8
LOL...with any of the modern street cams, you won't have any problems like that. I'd use a Comp XE256H or a Comp 262H with those heads and a PerfRPM intake On EA3, it made 355hp & 340tq with an XE256H cam. Not quite to the 367hp advertised, but that's a 302, and you have a 289.
HTH
--Kyle
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#9
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #9
say i stick with stock heads... which to choose?
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Nov 8, 2005
#10
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #10
if you stick with the stock heads go with the smaller performer cam. If you pick up the rpm heads get a bigger cam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
211
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
137
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Drivetrain 5th Gear Ratio
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
939
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
F
Best plugs for carb'd roller
  • forango
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
944
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
HotFox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?