• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cams again... yup.. again

  • Thread starter Thread starter invertmast
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2006

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Jan 19, 2006
#1
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #1
Ok,
I'm lookin for some cams.. I've got a set of Comp springs on order and am really liking the comp XE274H cams. I've read about some people having PTV issues and some not. I've also read god only knows how many threads about degree'ing the cams, problems, etc. I want to hear from people who have them or have had them and there opinions. Also, where is the best place to get them (cheapest). And Should I order them w/ the 5* of advance REmoved from the cam, or order them with the 5* in the cam?
Mods to car:
FRPP/SVO blower @ 5psi (waiting on 9psi pulley)
Full O/R Exhaust
4.10 gears
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Jan 19, 2006
#2
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #2
I had interference with my aftermarket pistons but if you're running stock then you should be ok. If you ordered them without the advance ground in you'd DEFINATELY be ok. However, with your blower I'd recommend not going with the 274's. You'll bleed off too much boost,especially at sub 3500 rpm. VT makes some excellent blower specific cams. I'm not saying you'd lose power running the Comp's but honestly you'd probably only gain about 10-15 at the top of the tach and lose 10-15 at the lower end. The VT blower specific's would add a nice 20-25 across the board. Maybe more.
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Jan 19, 2006
#3
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #3
I'm aware of the boost bleeding off.. but I also haven't ordered my 9psi pulley yet, as im hoping to get the cams installed so i can see just how much boost i will lose with them, so i can get the correct boost for the 9psi.

Also with this blower now, you dont really start feeling the boost until around 2800 - 3000 rpm. I've also heard that most of the VT cams are on backorder..

Does anyone have a link to VT's website?
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Jan 19, 2006
#4
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #4
www.vtengines.com
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Jan 19, 2006
#5
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #5
Also,at any boost level you're going to have some bleed off.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Jan 19, 2006
#6
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #6
are you opposed to throwing on a set of PI heads and cams at the same time?
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Jan 19, 2006
#7
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #7
Also,at any boost level you're going to have some bleed off.
Click to expand...

I'm aware of that.. And i don't mind the 1 or 2 psi loss, if i'm gettin more airflow into and out of the motor.


Jackie Chan said:
are you opposed to throwing on a set of PI heads and cams at the same time?
Click to expand...


Yes I am, b/c I don't have the $$$$ for a new blower, not to mention the 10.5:1 compression probably won't be too good with 9psi of boost... I've also got another spare set of Non PI heads that will be gettin P&P'd around the end of the year.
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Jan 19, 2006
#8
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #8
I follow what you're saying about being ok with losing some "psi" but what I"m saying is:it won't just be a reduction in boost pressure because of the better airflow. You will actually be losing some of the air volume out the exhaust. So,we know that boost pressure is not a direct indicator of airflow and your pressure will drop NOT just because of the added airflow,but because of the air not staying in the cylinder.
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Jan 19, 2006
#9
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #9
ahh ok.. I gotcha... What about getting a custom grind from Houston Performance for my specific setup...
 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
Jan 19, 2006
#10
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #10
Sounds like a great idea!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
217
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
655
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
41
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
B
Questions Replacing Cam Synchronizer
  • Blackout67
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
288
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 23, 2025
01cstang
0
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
728
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?