• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Can this be made a sticky?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponysarepretty
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2005

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Dec 14, 2005
#1
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #1
HP = TQ * RPM / 5250

HP is horsepower, measured in horsepower
TQ is measured in lbft.
RPM is how fast the engine is spinning when it is producing that much torque.


Seems a lot of people don't know the two are related.
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Dec 14, 2005
#2
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #2
Nope, not really. I never really understood either for a while. HP only really matters to me in bragging rights. I want torque and a good rev capability. That will make for a fun street car. Horsepower doesnt exist anyway, its just a number.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Dec 14, 2005
#3
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #3
Dragstr05 said:
Nope, not really. I never really understood either for a while. HP only really matters to me in bragging rights. I want torque and a good rev capability. That will make for a fun street car. Horsepower doesnt exist anyway, its just a number.
Click to expand...

On the contrary.. horsepower DOES exist.. although it is only a number, but so is your age, your bank account balance, etc. Horse power is the equivalent number of horses it would take to pull a wagon at the same rate as you.
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Dec 14, 2005
#4
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #4
Exactly, would take a hell of a lot of horses to pull a wagon the same rate as me buddy

I was only saying that no, physically there is no horsepower, its a measurement of Torque and RPM - the two things that really matter. Horsepower is a good tool, but again its only a number. The dyno doesnt measure horsepower, it calculates it.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Dec 14, 2005
#5
  • Dec 14, 2005
  • #5
no

before this gets made a sticky, exhaust related threads and pi headswap info should be made stickies.. and we all know that will never happen
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Dec 15, 2005
#6
  • Dec 15, 2005
  • #6
James Watt (yes, the same "watt" used to measure power of everything from audio amps to lightbulbs) gave us the original horsepower. In determining the requirements for a steam engine to replace horses used in a coal mine for hauling coal up the shafts his observations led him to the conclusion that on average, a healthy horse could lift 550 pounds one foot in one second. This is equivalent to 33,000 pounds one foot in one minute. It turns out that his HP is equivalent to 746 Joules/sec or "watts".

Work is the moving of a mass through a distance against a summation of resistive forces like friction and the like. The rate at which work is done is the definition of power. While a small horse might lift 400 pounds a foot in a second, a big clydesdale might lift that 400 pounds that same distance in half the time.

In looking at the root definition of a horsepower, 33,000 pounds one foot per minute, you can already see the units: ft-lbs/min. In rotating machinery, it's necessary to factor in the 2-pi radians a moment arm moves through per revolution, which we already give the units 1/min to (i.e. RPM). 33,000/2*PI = 5252.11.

Power does clearly exist and can be measured as a result of doing work; e.g. quarter mile performance. The rate at which work is done is power.

While peak power is interesting and a source for bragging, the total area under the HP/RPM curve over the operating range of the engine is probably more important overall which is where big torque at lower RPM matters. Of course the ideal is big torque down low and, as torque falls off, the ability of the engine to spin to high RPM to continue making good power even as torque falls away.

Like an 03 Cobra motor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
Drivetrain Sticky clutch pedal
  • keel
  • Jul 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
808
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 17, 2025
Mindseye007
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
672
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
168
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?