• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Can't wait any longer. Gotta spill the beans

  • Thread starter Thread starter 10secgoal
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

MrBobMarley

Founding Member
Oct 7, 2002
460
0
16
Ft Myers, FL
Jun 13, 2006
#21
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #21
I say go for it if it makes economical sense. One thing I love about my pushrod is the snappy throttle response. Every 4.6 modular I've driven has the slowest rpm drop when you let off the gas after a nice rev.

I'm thinking that has more to do with the computer than the engine though. I'd love to hear a carbed modular video if anyone has a link.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Jun 14, 2006
#22
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #22
I can toss my input in here. I have a 1999 F-250 with the 5.4 motor. They DOOOO spit spark plugs. You can only use Ford spark plugs for that engine. Something to do with threads (only 5 total if you are wondering) Also, if you do pop a spark plug, it most likely means a new head. This happened to me. $2800 later, I was on the road. 10K later the engine spun a bearing and I did not get the thing turned off quick enough, and I seized it. New motor from Jepson ($5800) and I am doing fine. There are very few after market parts for the motor.

I say do the pushrod or just pick up the KB twin screw for a 4.6 and enjoy the huge aftermarket. Or spend the couple of thousand $$ less and build up a monster pushrod with turbo.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Jun 14, 2006
#23
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #23
I can post some pics of the engine as it sits in the truck, and at tape measure to show you scale if you want. It is a huge engine! Wide and tall.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 15, 2006
#24
  • Jun 15, 2006
  • #24
I picked up the block and heads for measuring. Not going to do this. Fitting and all that didn't really bother me all that much. But it wasn't as complete as he said, or I thought. So it would be to expensive to build, and then drop in. Oh well. fix the tranny and HG problem and try to split the block. I might get a 69 351w for free here soon. So we'll see.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 16, 2006
#25
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #25
I bet your buddy richard will be pissed that he aint gettin those heads now!

Good talkin to you the other day.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jun 16, 2006
#26
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #26
allcarfan said:
I bet your buddy richard will be pissed that he aint gettin those heads now!
Click to expand...

maybe that 351w wont be free after all
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 16, 2006
#27
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #27
12sec67 said:


maybe that 351w wont be free after all
Click to expand...
Can you do the seals in the heads....
I'll remember that when you want roller perches made.

If thing doesn't sell shane, I'll be giving you a call again.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jun 16, 2006
#28
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #28
10secgoal said:
Can you do the seals in the heads....
I'll remember that when you want roller perches made.

If thing doesn't sell shane, I'll be giving you a call again.
Click to expand...

hey thats right!

we can do that when i switch to the 6cyl front springs
 
S

StaffAmerica74

Member
Apr 18, 2003
120
0
16
Easton, Pa
Jun 16, 2006
#29
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #29
MrBobMarley said:
I say go for it if it makes economical sense. One thing I love about my pushrod is the snappy throttle response. Every 4.6 modular I've driven has the slowest rpm drop when you let off the gas after a nice rev.

I'm thinking that has more to do with the computer than the engine though. I'd love to hear a carbed modular video if anyone has a link.
Click to expand...

Hmm yeah I have a 93 lincoln mark viii with the 32v 4.6 and man it takes forever to get that thing to wind down. I just thought something was wrong with my car lol.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 16, 2006
#30
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #30
StaffAmerica74 said:
Hmm yeah I have a 93 lincoln mark viii with the 32v 4.6 and man it takes forever to get that thing to wind down. I just thought something was wrong with my car lol.
Click to expand...
I think most stock cams are like that. I noticed a big difference when I cammed mine a few years ago.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
746
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
138
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
833
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?