• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

CDC Shaker Hood System...release date?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pumpkinfish
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
H

hurdlinmasta

New Member
Dec 25, 2004
85
0
0
May 1, 2005
#21
  • May 1, 2005
  • #21
ExCon said:
HMM, you know what? If thats the case its even more ridiculous! Why on Gods green earth install something on their car that requires major modifications simply because it looks cool? Why not install a huge wing on the back like the Honda ricers, makes the same amount of sense. They will tell you their wing reduces lift. Give me a break!! Might I suggest something a little more reasonable to piss away money on? Maybe get rid of the Skanker stereo or invest your money into wheels and tires. But too each his own!! If guys want to cut a huge hole in their hood in order to install a plastic box then God bless them! Its their car and they can do with it as they please! I just think there are ALOT better ways to increase performance and or enhance the look of an absolutely beautiful automobile than to cut it up and mount plastic boxes on the hood. Ford finally got rid of the horrible fake hood scoops on the Mustang and people want to reverse the trend towards a Beautiful car and turn it back into the circus act that they used to look like.
Why not just buy an 04 instead? They have the tasteless look built right in!
Click to expand...


Many things wrong with your "argument" #1 its not a "fake" hood scoop, but nice try. Cause fake would mean its blocked off, not useable. #2 its like getting a body kit, why spend 1,000-5000 on a body kit? Im sure you can get a supercharger for that. Cause it looks good. Why spend extra money upgrading from Deluxe to Premium (i think thats how it is) or get the IUP? Cause it looks good. You could have saved money not getting those upgrades. Why did you buy a 05 stang? You could have bought a 98 BMW for 800 dollars, and spent 25k on it and made it faster than your mustang, and with better handling. Cause it looks better. So i dont get how you can say looks are stupid.
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
May 2, 2005
#22
  • May 2, 2005
  • #22
ExCon said:
Not only do you ruin the beautiful lines on your 05 by installing that trash, its common knowledge hat RAM AIR is a complete and total SCAM. Ram air was a marketing ploy used by the car industry in the 1960's to sell more cars. The Ram Air concept has no basis in fact. In order for Ram Air to function you must compress air molecules in order to provide additional oxygen. You would need to be driving at 400+ MPH to compress air molecules with that ridiculous setup. The funny thing is that people continue to buy this junk and install it on their car in the 21st Century!! PT Barnum was right: Sucker Born Every Minute
Click to expand...

If Ram Air is such a scam, why did the engineers at Mercedes decide to put RAM Air on the Mclaren SLR. Certainly the Germans would not put something on a car that serves no purpose. Unless of course RAM AIR only works on real preformance cars . Or maybe Mercedes is looking to break into the Hillbilly Performace market. In case you doubt me here is a link to the Mercedes SLR website, see page 8
http://www.mbusa.com/microsite/slr/index.jsp
 
A

Alamo

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
1
0
0
SA, TX
May 3, 2005
#23
  • May 3, 2005
  • #23
ExCon said:
If you guys actually choose to believe that a hood scoop can actually compress air molecules I suggest you go back to school. That is why they make Turbos and Superchargers. A hood scoop CANNOT COMPRESS air molecules. Look I could care less what you want to believe go waste your money because you deserve to lose it considering the fact that you actually believe a scoop can perform such magic. Do a search and you will see that I am far from the only person who knows the truth about RAM AIR. RAM AIR: What A Joke!!
Click to expand...

A simple airplane wing compresses air which creates high pressure thats how they get off the ground. A 727 does not have to go very fast to compress enough air to create high pressue & lift.
 

pumpkinfish

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
23
0
0
Philly Area
May 3, 2005
#24
  • May 3, 2005
  • #24
Bad news for everyone waiting. I just received an e-mail from Kim @ CDC and she said the shaker system should be available by the end of June. I guess we keep waiting.
 
A

Alamo

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
1
0
0
SA, TX
May 4, 2005
#25
  • May 4, 2005
  • #25
pumpkinfish said:
Bad news for everyone waiting. I just received an e-mail from Kim @ CDC and she said the shaker system should be available by the end of June. I guess we keep waiting.
Click to expand...

With this shaker system, do you buy a new hood with the scoop cut out or do they give you a template to cut a hole in your hood. ?
 
W

Wsmatau

Member
Nov 30, 2004
93
0
6
May 4, 2005
#26
  • May 4, 2005
  • #26
From Fang

Write Fang performance! They told me their shaker will be available next week. The new hood is required because the unit sits 4-5 inches further back than the CDC model. I'm still waiting on the twin screw guys to get their acts together to see if I can make one work with the Shaker.
 

Dotanukie

New Member
Dec 2, 2004
69
0
0
Hillsborough, New Jersey
May 4, 2005
#27
  • May 4, 2005
  • #27
OMG, we're getting deep into the realm of physics here and it's painfully apparent that some people have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. Excon, did you ever take a high school physics course, or were you blazing up in bathroom or sleeping through it? First off, there are no "air molecules", there are nitrogen and oxygen molecules and molecules of other rarer gases that are at or near the low % level, which all make up air. Small point but I feel like being a smartass. Second, typically there is no negative pressure in a cars fender well at speed, ever see a late 60's Dodge Daytona or Plymouth Super Bee? Ever see those funny little scoops that point backward mounted on the top of the fenders and right above the front wheels? There are large holes in the fender tops right under those scoops that are there specifically to vent high pressure air that builds up under the front fenders at high speed and which contributes to front end lift. They needed some way to cover those holes so they put in those little scoops. I believe the Corvette C5R's also have grills or ducts on the fender tops for the same purpose, as well as the GTSR Vipers. Also, if there were negative pressure in the fender well that would not be an ideal place to put a CAI as that negative pressure would then be detrimental to the motor, since the number of available oxygen molecules would be that much lower. Remember, lower external pressure equals less efficiency and less horsepower, which is why a normally aspirated car in Denver makes less power than the same car at sea level, and why cars with forced induction don't suffer from changes in altitude, for the most part. Last, the ram air scoop in fact will create a higher level of air pressure available to the motors intake when moving at speed, in theory. There are two ways to increasing the air pressure inside a closed vessel, one is to pump more air in through mechanical assistance, namely using a compressor such as a turbo or supercharger. The other would be to create a flow of air into the vessels opening by moving it through that medium at high speed. Granted, the effect is small when dealing with cars, the area of the opening in the scoops face and the speed of travel being the limiting factors among other things, but the effect is proven. What makes the effect small on cars has as much to do with the scoops placement as speed or volume. Most auto scoops, ram air or not, are low in height, and operate in whats called the boundry layer of airflow over the cars surface. Ever see those pictures of a car in a wind tunnel with the white smoke flowing over it? Ever notice how that smoke stream seems to sit an inch or so off the surface of the car? Thats because as the moving air approaches the surface of the car, it gets slowed down by contact with it and friction, to the point of being almost still right at the surface. This is a well known effect in aerodynamics, and can have significant meaning to designers when considering where to put an aircrafts engine intake. This is one of the reasons why ram air is not that effective on cars, not that the physical theory is unsound. The theory is well proven, any high school kid can learn about it and understand it, but in order for it to be fully effective the scoop would need to be about a foot high so that it can get at the high speed non-turbulent air that exists above the cars surface and the car would need to be going at triple digit speeds, and the opening in the scoops face would need to be as large as possible. Anyway, my point is not that ram air does or doesn't work in a car. Given the typical scoops size, the cars speed, and the geometry of a typical engines intake, the effect is very small to none. My point was more to address the fact that Excon keeps blabbing that ram air is a myth and a physical impossiblity, when in fact it is a well characterized phenomenon. Pick up a physics textbook sometime dude, makes for interesting reading. If the ram air effect was a physical impossibility then all the billions of dollars that NASA has invested into the research of SCRAM jet powered aircraft would have been pissed away, but I distinctly remember the X-43 hitting over mach 9 back last November.

Oh, and aircraft wings don't create lift by generating high pressure. The upper surface of a wing is curved, while the lower surface of a wing is straight. As air flows over the wing two "packets" of air, one above and below the wing, must meet at the other side at the same time. Since the upper surface is curved, it is longer than the lower, and thus the air must travel faster to meet up with it's counterpart at the other side at the same time. This higher velocity air above the wing creates a negative pressure, which is whats called lift, or the Bernoulli effect. It's actually a bit more complex than that, but thats the common explaination.
 
A

Alamo

New Member
Apr 13, 2005
1
0
0
SA, TX
May 4, 2005
#28
  • May 4, 2005
  • #28
Dotanukie said:
OMG, we're getting deep into the realm of physics here and it's painfully apparent that some people have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. Excon, did you ever take a high school physics course, or were you blazing up in bathroom or sleeping through it? First off, there are no "air molecules", there are nitrogen and oxygen molecules and molecules of other rarer gases that are at or near the low % level, which all make up air. Small point but I feel like being a smartass. Second, typically there is no negative pressure in a cars fender well at speed, ever see a late 60's Dodge Daytona or Plymouth Super Bee? Ever see those funny little scoops that point backward mounted on the top of the fenders and right above the front wheels? There are large holes in the fender tops right under those scoops that are there specifically to vent high pressure air that builds up under the front fenders at high speed and which contributes to front end lift. They needed some way to cover those holes so they put in those little scoops. I believe the Corvette C5R's also have grills or ducts on the fender tops for the same purpose, as well as the GTSR Vipers. Also, if there were negative pressure in the fender well that would not be an ideal place to put a CAI as that negative pressure would then be detrimental to the motor, since the number of available oxygen molecules would be that much lower. Remember, lower external pressure equals less efficiency and less horsepower, which is why a normally aspirated car in Denver makes less power than the same car at sea level, and why cars with forced induction don't suffer from changes in altitude, for the most part. Last, the ram air scoop in fact will create a higher level of air pressure available to the motors intake when moving at speed, in theory. There are two ways to increasing the air pressure inside a closed vessel, one is to pump more air in through mechanical assistance, namely using a compressor such as a turbo or supercharger. The other would be to create a flow of air into the vessels opening by moving it through that medium at high speed. Granted, the effect is small when dealing with cars, the area of the opening in the scoops face and the speed of travel being the limiting factors among other things, but the effect is proven. What makes the effect small on cars has as much to do with the scoops placement as speed or volume. Most auto scoops, ram air or not, are low in height, and operate in whats called the boundry layer of airflow over the cars surface. Ever see those pictures of a car in a wind tunnel with the white smoke flowing over it? Ever notice how that smoke stream seems to sit an inch or so off the surface of the car? Thats because as the moving air approaches the surface of the car, it gets slowed down by contact with it and friction, to the point of being almost still right at the surface. This is a well known effect in aerodynamics, and can have significant meaning to designers when considering where to put an aircrafts engine intake. This is one of the reasons why ram air is not that effective on cars, not that the physical theory is unsound. The theory is well proven, any high school kid can learn about it and understand it, but in order for it to be fully effective the scoop would need to be about a foot high so that it can get at the high speed non-turbulent air that exists above the cars surface and the car would need to be going at triple digit speeds, and the opening in the scoops face would need to be as large as possible. Anyway, my point is not that ram air does or doesn't work in a car. Given the typical scoops size, the cars speed, and the geometry of a typical engines intake, the effect is very small to none. My point was more to address the fact that Excon keeps blabbing that ram air is a myth and a physical impossiblity, when in fact it is a well characterized phenomenon. Pick up a physics textbook sometime dude, makes for interesting reading. If the ram air effect was a physical impossibility then all the billions of dollars that NASA has invested into the research of SCRAM jet powered aircraft would have been pissed away, but I distinctly remember the X-43 hitting over mach 9 back last November.

Oh, and aircraft wings don't create lift by generating high pressure. The upper surface of a wing is curved, while the lower surface of a wing is straight. As air flows over the wing two "packets" of air, one above and below the wing, must meet at the other side at the same time. Since the upper surface is curved, it is longer than the lower, and thus the air must travel faster to meet up with it's counterpart at the other side at the same time. This higher velocity air above the wing creates a negative pressure, which is whats called lift, or the Bernoulli effect. It's actually a bit more complex than that, but thats the common explaination.
Click to expand...

If I recall my college physics, the physicist’s name was Bernoulli that comes up with the theorems of high & low pressure. I sure it was him because I remember he came up with his principle while teaching at an all girl school in Italy. Funny how things like that stick in your mind.
 

Kevinrox

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
0
0
0
May 8, 2005
#29
  • May 8, 2005
  • #29
I am loving this... what a conversation. IMO if you are looking for HP, save the money you spend putting a hole in the hood and get the supercharger or turbo added. If you looking for cool, tough one... I think a fake scoop cost less. Personally, I wouldn't do the shaker... you're inviting someone to race you and the shaker isn't going to cut it unless there's something magical in it that I don't know about. But in the end, it's your car and your money, do what "you" want to do... and don't listen to anyone unless you are looking for more HP. Yes cold air does the engine better, but I think it comes cheaper in a CAI than a shaker. If money is not an issue, the shaker looks way cooler than a fancy air breather under the hood.
 

05SatinSilver

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
69
0
0
May 9, 2005
#30
  • May 9, 2005
  • #30
Alamo said:
With this shaker system, do you buy a new hood with the scoop cut out or do they give you a template to cut a hole in your hood. ?
Click to expand...
No you don't! Have you ever seen the underside of your current stock hood?
Looks like Ford was already for this mod.
Here it is...


Dave...
 

Attachments

  • hood1.webp
    43.1 KB · Views: 171
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
736
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
PCV system help for S/C
  • jay99914
  • Feb 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
614
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2025
jay99914
J
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
446
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
681
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?