• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Choices...

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywalker
  • Start date Start date Apr 17, 2004

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#1
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #1
I've decided on getting a cam from comp cams. I haevn't decided which one.

I'm looking at the 270H, the 268H, XE256H or the XE268H.

I have mostly stock right now but I want to change that in the future. Only real mods i have are my edelbrock intake and 650cfm edelbrock carb. I'm going to add headers and eventually aftermarket heads though. It's a daily driver so I want something that has a civil idle (a little lopey isn't a bad thing though) but at the same time I want to see some power gains, particularly in the low and mid range. Any suggestions on which I should go with?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#2
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #2
The XE (Extreme Energy) cams are great for mild street machines. I would go with the XE268 if you want to push it to the limit of the stock converter and maximize performance. If idle quality and milder performacne with good gas mileage is your concern then the XE256 might be a better choice. Either will work nice with aftermarket heads.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#3
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #3
I should mention I run a T-5 tranny and I have really high gears (numerically low, like 2.75 or something around there)
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#4
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #4
I still like the XE series of cams for the street......and your tranny is great but you could stand some more rear gear.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#5
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #5
I'm wanting to put in a trac-lok rear and when I do that I'll probably step the rear gears up a little bit (3.25 area) But it IS a daily driver so...the gears aren't going to far.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#6
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #6
With a T-5 you could run a 4.11 rear gear with the same effective rpms in 5th the car would have run with an original C-4 in 4th gear......and my old coupe could get 24 mpg on the highway with a C-4, food for thought. I suggest 3.50s at least.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#7
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #7
C-4 was 3-speeds. And that's exactly what I want to avoid. No 3.25 sounds good for my uses. It's not going to be a drag car so...
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#8
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #8
Yeah....I was asleep when I put 4th gear for a C-4....I know it only has 3
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#9
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #9
Don't worry, it happens to LL of us. I've made worse mistakes! haha. I was perplexed for a moment caue I was thinking "I'm the guy who is new to american cars and fords especially, of all people this guy should know!!!" It's kewl though.
I hated the C-4. Not because it was a bad transmission but because a) I don't particularly like driving an automatic, I feel a loos of control when I do. and b) gas mileage was hideous...not good for a daily driven car.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 17, 2004
#10
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #10
With your shorter rear tires ( about 26 vs my 28's on my 89 V8 Ranger) your first gear with a T-5 and 3.25's is close to the same ratio as the Toploader 4 speed ( 2.78 1st) and 3.73 rear I'm running. This combo I have is about as low a 1st gear as you'd ever want. As soon as you nail the gas, the motor hits 5500 rpms , and I end up floating the valves before I can shift. I wouldn't go lower on your rear gear, even with the T-5's overdrive.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Apr 17, 2004
#11
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #11
3.25 is where I plan to go, I'm currently like 2.7x.
 

Rent-A-Racer

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
187
0
0
Apr 18, 2004
#12
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #12
skywalker, did you to the T-5 swap?? How was it? Difficulty wise?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Cam Choice Time
  • dragstart
  • Apr 16, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2024
limp
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
S
Newbie looking for budget 5.0 and suspension advice
  • stillwater79
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
797
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 3, 2024
AeroCoupe
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
812
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?