• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

coba intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter airbag
  • Start date Start date Nov 26, 2005

airbag

New Member
Aug 16, 2005
49
0
0
hebron, indiana
Nov 26, 2005
#1
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #1
cobra intake

the car is a 92 gt dss 306 shortblock fully balanced, x cam, 1.6rr, edelbrock 2.02's, have a cobra intake, do i need something bigger or will this work.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 26, 2005
#2
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #2
I would want to look a little bigger..maybe an edelbrock intake, I'm also a big fan of the GT40...it seems a very capable intake. If you have the cobra already then I'd look to Tmoss to port the lower and definately use it.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 26, 2005
#3
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #3
DMAN - The Cobra and the GT40 share the same lower intake -- and the lower is the bottleneck; the two flow almost identically (as does the Explorer - which also uses the same lower). So, if the lower needs to be ported for the Cobra, it also needs to be ported for the GT40 -- they share the same lower.

The Cobra intake will likely work just fine -- it won't work quite as well above 5000-5500 rpm as the Edelbrock will - but will probably work better below 4000 rpm. As DMAN says, have tmoss port the lower, and I think it will be just as good for you as the aftermarket units will with your set up.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 26, 2005
#4
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #4
There ya go..you learn something every day..I was not aware the Gt and cobra intakes share the idential lower...nice bit of info. I was using available test info on the GT40vs other intakes in recent magazines..they indicated the Gt did make excellent numbers down low and mid range..better than other popular intakes..giving up very little up top.
 

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
Nov 26, 2005
#5
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #5
wow, you have almost an identical setup to me.... with that said port it like the others said and you will be happy with the results.
 
S

slow93

New Member
May 3, 2005
406
0
0
Nov 26, 2005
#6
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #6
if you didnt want to port it for some reason you maybe could look into a typhoon intake which is identical to an edelbrock
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Nov 26, 2005
#7
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #7
i think you could use it as is and you'd still be happy - but to maximize performance, you must port that lower
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Nov 26, 2005
#8
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #8
Have TMOSS port your lower Cobra intake.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 27, 2005
#9
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #9
DMAN - Explorer shares the same lower too....all 3 work almost identically...
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 27, 2005
#10
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #10
slow93 said:
if you didnt want to port it for some reason you maybe could look into a typhoon intake which is identical to an edelbrock
Click to expand...
Keeping in mind that it's a copy of the RPM, not the regular Performer...
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 27, 2005
#11
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #11
Michael Yount said:
DMAN - Explorer shares the same lower too....all 3 work almost identically...
Click to expand...
Even better...that alone should make the explorer intake a little more desired. I am a fan of the appearance/performance of the GT intake, but not of the suggested price tag. Thanks for the scoop of info Mike..that's good stuff to know.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 27, 2005
#12
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #12
Explorer = poor man's GT40 intake, that's why I have one
 

plastic_cow

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
146
0
0
Oshkosh, WI
Nov 27, 2005
#13
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #13
tmoss said:
Explorer = poor man's GT40 intake, that's why I have one
Click to expand...
I'll drink to that, as I myself have the explorer intake... ($200 for upper/lower)
But correct me if I'm wrong, the cobra, the upper and lower can be ported, however the GT-40, only the lower can be... would it be benificial to have both ported on his cobra intake...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 27, 2005
#14
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #14
I would rarely recommend porting a Cobra/Explorer upper intake. With a ported lower they can flow ~250-260cfm and flow enough for most "street" style aftermarket heads. Once you get to 270cfm of flow, go to a bigger intake or an intake that can be ported to flow the required amount.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
521
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
S
Engine Edelbrock 1406 install help
  • scottcarp10
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
229
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 15, 2025
scottcarp10
S
T
Resolved No run or idle
  • Thebluefox1
  • Oct 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
445
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
DadLife0724
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
305
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?