• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

convertibles owners read.............

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackstanger95
  • Start date Start date Nov 30, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
May 15, 2005
#21
  • May 15, 2005
  • #21
among the other things listed, alum rad, billet electric water pump, manual steering (a bitch for a DD tho), battery in trunk (more for wieght transfer, but thats the goal along with weight reduction), lightweight front brakes like Wilwoods, and some skinnies for track duty wouldn't hurt either...just some suggestions guys....my dad got 197 lbs off the front of his chevelle over the winter, and he used those things about along with a few other things that wouldn't apply to late model mustangs such as a 3lb fiberglass front bumper
 
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
May 16, 2005
#22
  • May 16, 2005
  • #22
How much of a difference at the track would say 3000 and 3300 pounds make?
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
May 16, 2005
#23
  • May 16, 2005
  • #23
215hp, 3300lbs- 14.48 at 94mph
215hp, 3000lbs- 14.02 at 97mph

From http://www.mustangworks.com/analyzer.html
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 16, 2005
#24
  • May 16, 2005
  • #24
Synned said:
How much of a difference at the track would say 3000 and 3300 pounds make?
Click to expand...


approx 3 tenth's 100LBS = 1 tenth.
 
M

mikeflys1

Founding Member
Aug 27, 2002
217
1
0
CT
May 16, 2005
#25
  • May 16, 2005
  • #25
The sound deadening stuff definately isnt 80 lbs. Maybe 15-25 tops throughout the whole car.
 
B

BOSTANG

New Member
Apr 28, 2005
27
0
0
Mesa AZ
May 16, 2005
#26
  • May 16, 2005
  • #26
Get rid of those heavy ass stock seats.
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
May 16, 2005
#27
  • May 16, 2005
  • #27
Agreed....I lost a TON of weight by going to my Summit racing seats.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
May 16, 2005
#28
  • May 16, 2005
  • #28
mikeflys1 said:
The sound deadening stuff definately isnt 80 lbs. Maybe 15-25 tops throughout the whole car.
Click to expand...

I don't know man, I read somewhere that a guy took out all his sound deadening material, and he had like 3.5 garbage bags full of it, and they weighed like 20 lbs a piece. When I took out my insulation pad under the rear seat, that thing was damn heavy just by itself.
 
R

Rossafeller

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
28
0
0
May 22, 2005
#29
  • May 22, 2005
  • #29
Convertible comment

Most likely you WOULD gain the biggest advantage by removing your sound detoner material. My 87 GT CONV weighs 4100, and i have removed my back seat and i may have been looking at losing about 6-7 pounds. My friend has a 96 GT and his car weighs over 4400, so im guessing that the mid 90's year models gained the extra weight with the sounds blocking material and all of the added safety equipment. I can say that if you do remove your back seat you wont really have to worry about it being TOO loud, because the carpet alone will muffle it alot; when my back was bare metal it was very loud, but once i carpeted it, it sounded the same as before.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
May 22, 2005
#30
  • May 22, 2005
  • #30
Rossafeller said:
Most likely you WOULD gain the biggest advantage by removing your sound detoner material. My 87 GT CONV weighs 4100, and i have removed my back seat and i may have been looking at losing about 6-7 pounds. My friend has a 96 GT and his car weighs over 4400, so im guessing that the mid 90's year models gained the extra weight with the sounds blocking material and all of the added safety equipment. I can say that if you do remove your back seat you wont really have to worry about it being TOO loud, because the carpet alone will muffle it alot; when my back was bare metal it was very loud, but once i carpeted it, it sounded the same as before.
Click to expand...

Your cars don't weigh that much. If you got that weight from the door sticker, that's maximum pulling weight, as in how much the car is able to pull safely fully loaded. Like with 4 passengers and luggage.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 22, 2005
#31
  • May 22, 2005
  • #31
Steven, where are you getting these numbers from? (meaning where are you weighing it at) I see NO WAY IN HELL those cars weigh >4100. Even with a iron headed dart block, no weight reduction, full tank of fuel, roll CAGE, subframes, AOD, etc I still don't see it getting into that weight range.
 
2

215what

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
154
0
0
NM
May 22, 2005
#32
  • May 22, 2005
  • #32
cut the metal under the palstic all that safety crap should save some good weight just leve the skin of the car
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
May 22, 2005
#33
  • May 22, 2005
  • #33
yeah you could remove both front fenders, the hood and the bumpers....
 

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
May 22, 2005
#34
  • May 22, 2005
  • #34
no way in hell are those cars that heavy......did you take the kegs out of the back when you put them on the scales?
Killercanary said:
Steven, where are you getting these numbers from? (meaning where are you weighing it at) I see NO WAY IN HELL those cars weigh >4100. Even with a iron headed dart block, no weight reduction, full tank of fuel, roll CAGE, subframes, AOD, etc I still don't see it getting into that weight range.
Click to expand...
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
May 22, 2005
#35
  • May 22, 2005
  • #35
I'd guess that mine is probably one of the heavier ones out there - it weighs 3800 with me in it. Up 100# from a year and a half ago - I seem to be going in the opposite direction. But the Windsor block weighs 100+# more than the 302 and all the turbo crap is heavy too. I did move the battery to the trunk so it won't be quite as nose heavy. Plus I got rid of my skinnys up front - too scary on the street.

Don't go too crazy getting rid of the comfort features, just add more power
 
R

Rossafeller

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
28
0
0
May 23, 2005
#36
  • May 23, 2005
  • #36
Well, i stand corrected, because i was getting our weight from the door stickers where it says total curb weight. If thats not where you all get your weight from, then how do you get it, i wouldnt mind knowing how much my car weighed stock?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
May 23, 2005
#37
  • May 23, 2005
  • #37
No, you can NOT use that weight. We either weight our cars at the track on its scales or any place that can weigh a vehicle like a place that sells stone, coal, etc.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
May 23, 2005
#38
  • May 23, 2005
  • #38
Rossafeller said:
Well, i stand corrected, because i was getting our weight from the door stickers where it says total curb weight. If thats not where you all get your weight from, then how do you get it, i wouldnt mind knowing how much my car weighed stock?
Click to expand...

Like Paul said, if your track has a scale (mine doesn't ) then you can weigh it there. Otherwise, you might try the city dump.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
785
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
531
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
357
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
M
1997 Mustang GT Overheating Issue
  • Mustang1988!!
  • Sep 3, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
319
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
squeak93
Resolved Three way cat converters..?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
297
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?