• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Cooling System Issues/questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter rideapony
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2016
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 10, 2016
#1
  • Sep 10, 2016
  • #1
Hi all,
On my 90 GT I'm running a March Performance UD pulleys Kit 1015 I have no issues until I removed the AC system. I wanted to keep the PS pump down in the stock position but the problem is with the WP pulley, the belt rubs when loading the belt tensioner. To solve this problem I replaced the pulley with the stock one and the rubbing problem was solved, the belt runs fine. Well another problem occurred, the temperature went up close to 210 degrees.
I have a 195 degree thermostat because I want to be around 195 - 200 deg. I'm running a Taurus fan with a Delta DC Controller and a Griffin aluminum radiator.
I believe I tried a 180 deg thermostat and the temp went up...
I read that many people run UD crank pulley and stock all the rest of the pulleys and they said no problems, others said they even run a 93 cobra pulley which is even smaller than the GT and no problems.
My 90 gt stock water pulley is smaller than the March one so the pump spins faster, so it should cool down better, or maybe too fast that the water don't spend enough time in the Rad to cool it down?.. Am I missing something here?

PLEASE HELP!!!
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 11, 2016
#2
  • Sep 11, 2016
  • #2
You need to relocate the PS to where the AC was andput the stock pulleys back on . U/D pulleys do nothing but cause cooling and charging issues. Are you turning the WP the wrong way now with your belt routing? The flat side of the belt should be riding on the WP pulley.

 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#3
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #3
Thank you mikestang63 for your reply.
With the UD pulley kit I have no issues with either cooling or charging. The problem started when I started using the stock WP pulley for belt clearance.
I have the correct belt routing as per reverse WP.
I kinda like to keep the SP down there and the belt has enough clearance with the stock WP pulley, but if I still have issues with that I can always invert the tension on the tensioner and put a grooved pulley to pull the belt upwards instead of pushing down on it.
The rising of the temp doesn't make any sense to me, since the stock WP pulley is smaller than the one from the UD kit therefore it spins a tad faster and should in theory be cooling better, but I guess not.
Any other ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you all!
 
Last edited: Sep 12, 2016

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#4
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #4
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,854
224
Massachusetts
Sep 12, 2016
#5
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #5
Even with the smaller WP pulley, it still spins slower due to the smaller crank.

Under drive pullies don't necessarily cause cooling issue, but they certainly expose any weaknesses in charging and cooling system if any exist.




Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#6
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #6
Thank you Mustang5L5

Well I have to say that just don't make sense.
If running the three UD pulleys from the Mach kit I don't see any cooling issues. Why by running a bit smaller water pump diameter will make the temp. to go up?
Here is my reasoning:
I was running this set up with no cooling issues:
UD crank pulley diameter is: 4 - 3/8"
UD Water pump pulley Diameter: 5 - 1/2"
Using a 1,000 rpm on the crank as a baseline, the water pulley will spin 795 rpm

Now I'm running this set up and the temp. got higher (WTF??):
UD crank pulley diameter is: 4 - 3/8"
STOCK Water pump pulley Diameter: 4 - 11/16"
Using a 1,000 rpm on the crank as a baseline, the water pulley will spin 933 rpm (138 RPM faster)

wouldn't I be in theory running cooler regardless of the UD status?
I'm just confused, to me it make sense that's why I plotted those numbers, but it seems to have an opposite effect in my cooling behavior.

I'll wait for your comments.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 12, 2016
#7
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #7
The water pump must run at or near the correct speed.
Too slow and it stays in the engine too long, too fast and it doesn't stay in the radiator long enough.
The key to the fox cooling system is when you get it right, don't mess with it.


Why did you remove the AC compressor?
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#8
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #8
Thanks 2000xp8
I started wondering about the water pump being running too fast as you mentioned. Even though that's the only thing that makes some sense, I'm not fully convinced, because with the stock pulleys using the same RPM baseline of 1,000 rpm, the water pump spins at 1,280 rpm, that is 257 rpm faster than what I'm running now.

The AC was removed because of three reasons:
A) Truly I never use the AC
B) One of the lines going to the compressor got broken, and.
C) the engine bay is cleaner and neater, plus easier to work on the engine with so many things less in your way
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Sep 12, 2016
#9
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #9
rideapony said:
Thanks 2000xp8
I started wondering about the water pump being running too fast as you mentioned. Even though that's the only thing that makes some sense, I'm not fully convinced, because with the stock pulleys using the same RPM baseline of 1,000 rpm, the water pump spins at 1,280 rpm, that is 257 rpm faster than what I'm running now.

The AC was removed because of three reasons:
A) Truly I never use the AC
B) One of the lines going to the compressor got broken, and.
C) the engine bay is cleaner and neater, plus easier to work on the engine with so many things less in your way
Click to expand...
Did you remove your AC condensor? If so, did you remove your radiator to access it or your front bumper? What I'm getting at is if you removed your radiator you could have air pockets in your engine and need to burp your system.
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#10
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #10
Oh I know what your saying FoxMustangLvr.

No I didn't remove the condenser I just disconnected the hoses and used rubber plugs on the condenser connectors to avoid dust and foreign objects to contaminate de condenser for future AC re-installation.
I removed the compressor, accumulator, and hoses
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Sep 12, 2016
#11
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #11
Ac delete pully
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Sep 12, 2016
#12
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #12
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,720
4,243
224
Sep 12, 2016
#13
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #13
Let's see some pics of this thing. Maybe something obvious will jump out.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Sep 12, 2016
#14
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #14
Could there be a restriction/ blockage? Might have not been an issue when the pump was running slower-with it spinning faster , the moving coolant could be hitting the blockage and pushing back against the flow ? Just a thought
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Sep 12, 2016
#15
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #15
RaggedGT said:
Could there be a restriction/ blockage? Might have not been an issue when the pump was running slower-with it spinning faster , the moving coolant could be hitting the blockage and pushing back against the flow ? Just a thought
Click to expand...






Has fresh coolant.
 
Reactions: FoxMustangLvr and RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Sep 12, 2016
#16
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #16
5.0Droptop said:
Has fresh coolant.
Click to expand...
I've honestly seen that A LOT lol
 
Reactions: rideapony and 5.0Droptop

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#17
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #17
Thanks 5.0droptop.
I thought about that but really want to keep the belt down low.
so here is my plan.
I will play with different setting on my Delta DC controller to bring the temperature down a bit and possibly change my thermostat to 180*. I will do this in an effort the keep the stock water pulley in place, if none of those two things work, then i will be forced to replace that pulley with the one I was running (complete March UD pulleys) and convert the belt tensioner to puller instead of pusher. This should be able to solve all of the issues I'm having.
I will publish whatever results.
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#18
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #18
Holly smokes!!!! That's some nasty stuff in that radiator!!!
I certainly don't have that, I run distilled water and about 30% anti freeze and since I have an aluminum radiator I use a radiator cap with a sacrifice rod to counter the electrolysis effect.
As a maintenance measure I will flush the cooling system and load it with new stuff.

Good suggestions from everyone, and I appreciate that!!!
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#19
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #19
 

rideapony

Active Member
May 28, 2006
168
20
39
SANTA ROSA, CA (North Bay Area)
Sep 12, 2016
#20
  • Sep 12, 2016
  • #20
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9384.webp
    328.5 KB · Views: 314
Reactions: 5.0Droptop
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
642
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Engine 1986 GT Overheating issues
  • 86 5O GT
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
445
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2026
86 5O GT
W
Electrical 91 GT Alternator Replacement Question
  • willrh111
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
299
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
nickyb
Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
569
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
J
Water pump pulley with super charger
  • jza873
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
207
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Oct 6, 2024
jza873
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?