• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Custom built short block. Can have either 28oz or 50oz balance. Which is better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joey7508
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2005
J

Joey7508

Member
Oct 23, 2005
198
0
17
Kerrville TX
Oct 30, 2005
#1
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #1
Looking for a short block. Probably going to be a 331. Possiably 347. CHP shows that you can have either balance 28 or 50. They will buikd them either way. Which is better what is the benifit of either. Some on told me 28 oz was better but did not say why. Help?
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
42
Oct 30, 2005
#2
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #2
It is determined on how the crank is balanced. I run a 50oz in my 347. Although FRPP crate motors have a 28oz. I personally think it provides a smother idle than a 28 because its weigh is more able to counter the crank harmonics.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Oct 30, 2005
#3
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #3
"They" say doing a 50 oz takes to much material from the crank and leaves it like "swiss cheese" which in turn could make the crank less durable. Whatever...my crank is a 50 oz balance by Coast (btw, they told me there is no difference in durablity between the 28 and the 50) and there was only like 3 spots and all of which were not very deep at all and they were not in any way put in an "iffy" place.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 31, 2005
#4
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #4
If you're getting a new damper and flywheel, then just go with 28oz if the prices are the same. There is less material on the damper, crank, and flywheel acting as a counterweight and its a little closer to a zero balanced engine.

BTW- cranks start looking more like swiss cheese the closer they get to zero balance, especially if one started as a 50oz.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 31, 2005
#5
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #5
Go 28oz 347. Its less weight hanging off the end of the crank.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
49
PA
www.rnhperformance.com
Oct 31, 2005
#6
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #6
Depends on how heavy the crank is but if you go 50oz it could have a lot of balance holes in the counter weights. Cast cranks can go 50, 28 usually with no issues, the forged cranks are better at 28 or 0 depending on the brand you use.

Personally if your upgrading your balancer and flywheel/flexplate go 28 or 0/internal and keep the weight off the snout.
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
52
Detroit, MI
Oct 31, 2005
#7
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #7
Mine is all Forged and 50oz. balanced. Works great! It really does not matter.
 

stangnutlx

New Member
May 24, 2005
242
0
0
48
Coventry, RI
Oct 31, 2005
#8
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #8
i got my CHP 306 balanced at 28oz.... CHP makes a real nice shortblock....
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
1
16
Oct 31, 2005
#9
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #9
A 28oz imbalance is OK in ur application. The crank and rods r balanced externally to the 28oz damper and 28oz flywheel. A 50oz crank is not any stronger than a 28oz crank or a neutral balanced crank.

A neutral balanced rotating assembly is balanced internally. The crank, rods and pistons are balanced together. Each rod and each piston weigh the same and the crank is drilled and filled with mallory to get the correct bobweight.

A neutral balanced engine will spin higher rpm's and last longer than an externally balanced engine. Costs range from $400-$800 depending on how much mallory is added. Most drag race and road race engines r neutral balanced.
 
C

clarkjr

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2000
716
1
19
NC
www.cmustangresource.com
Oct 31, 2005
#10
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #10
Rick 91GT said:
Personally if your upgrading your balancer and flywheel/flexplate go 28 or 0/internal and keep the weight off the snout.
Click to expand...

Depending on the assembly, I'd go zero and do it internally as Rick said. But 28 vs. 50, do the 28.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Oct 31, 2005
#11
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • #11
If you're getting a custom shortblock, just go all the way and get it internally balanced, its worth the $$$
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 1, 2005
#12
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #12
my 331 is 50oz because i didnt want to have to buy a new balancer haha
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
47
Dallas, GA
Nov 1, 2005
#13
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #13
I went 28oz with my 347 from rick because the cost of balancing is almost as much as a new flywheel and balancer, and I can sell my balancer and make up for it, so not a total loss. Yes, less bobweight does take stress off the crank, especailly at high RPM's. I have not heard of the bobweights of our cranks causing real issues.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Nov 1, 2005
#14
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #14
i would ask rick and go with his answer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?