• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

densecharger or C&L meter kit for 98 cobra/ which one??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98cobraghostman
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2004
9

98cobraghostman

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
8
0
1
Jul 17, 2004
#1
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #1
After installing gears and exhaust on my recently puchased 98 cobra conv., was wondering which set up would be better, anyone have any input/info about which way to go?? C&L 80mm mass air kit with the true flow pipe, or the densecharger system.

Please help, I need to get more power/torque to get this fridge moving!!!
 
0

01TrueBlueCobra

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
336
1
0
somewhere
Jul 17, 2004
#2
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #2
Get the WMS High velocity Intake system with the 95MAM . It provides much more horsepower and torque then the C&L setup. I dnoed 307Rwhp with the c&L setup then I switched to the WMS because the c&l was leaning out my car pretty bad . I got another dyno with the WMS and I had 332 RWHP
 
J

John98-4v

New Member
Mar 25, 2004
43
0
0
just south of Pittsburgh
Jul 18, 2004
#3
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #3
I had a c&l meter on my car for 5 minutes until I realized it was garbage, check engine light, missing, backfiring.........took it off, ran fine. I would go with a pro-m.
 

Tat98Cobra

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2002
681
0
0
Jul 18, 2004
#4
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #4
Its not the meter - its the calibration.

peace
 
S

SnakeBite98

New Member
Jul 11, 2003
94
0
0
Poway, CA
Jul 18, 2004
#5
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #5
01TrueBlueCobra said:
Get the WMS High velocity Intake system with the 95MAM . It provides much more horsepower and torque then the C&L setup. I dnoed 307Rwhp with the c&L setup then I switched to the WMS because the c&l was leaning out my car pretty bad . I got another dyno with the WMS and I had 332 RWHP
Click to expand...

I just put the WMS system on and love it. A buddy of mine put the Densecharger on his 99 snake and it looked like ****, it looks like they just bought alot of PVC pipe from Home Depot and threw it in the mail. C&L sucks, seems to the consensus around the boards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
764
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?