• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Did the Gas pedal mod.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Red03Mustang
  • Start date Start date Aug 5, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

forum155pl

New Member
Jul 11, 2006
520
0
0
the 509
Jan 10, 2007
#41
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #41
I have a buddy with a ford wrecking yard and lots of free time, so i goof around alot, I have 3 TB's sitting in my room right now that i have messed with in differant ways.. trial and error i guess lol.. i'm doing longtubes and stinger side exhaust with a TB and plenum in the next few weeks so i'm not too worried about it.. plus i have all my stock parts (yes, unmessed with)
 

forum155pl

New Member
Jul 11, 2006
520
0
0
the 509
Jan 10, 2007
#42
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #42
bet you guys havent seen a stang with a f150 intake on it i'll see if i can find pics...
 

DTNODYA

Member
Dec 15, 2005
831
1
16
Jan 10, 2007
#43
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #43
forum155pl said:
bet you guys havent seen a stang with a f150 intake on it i'll see if i can find pics...
Click to expand...

 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Jan 10, 2007
#44
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #44
I did it so I can heel-toe a lot easier.

there's no stinger side exhaust, unless you plan on making a custom one. if you do, be sure to take pics .
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 10, 2007
#45
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #45
LaserRed01GT said:
I think if you read my post one more time, you'll find that I never said that adding an aftermarket TB/Plenum would not increase power. I was merely trying to show that guy that in his efforts to port and make the throttle blade open more, he could have used his time and effort more effectively somewhere else.

The reason that an aftermarket TB/Plenum install makes the litte HP increase that it does has to do with the increased advantage of the pressure differential between atmosphere and the lower intake manifold. It has nothing to do with velocity and little to do with flow.
Click to expand...

No, I understand that you never said anything about aftermarket TB/plenum...its just that alot of guys will come on here and be like "Your stock headers are good for 450RWHP", or "Your stock TB is good for 350HP" ...you know, basically saying that these parts do not need to be replaced until a certain point.
I didnt want people thinking "hey, well he says that my stock plenum/TB flows enough at nearly 3/4 throttle to support my engines needs @ 6000RPM....so an aftermarket TB and plenum are a complete waste of money" . And thats completely not true...sure it may not give you a TON of power...but it will help on any car.


But doesnt that "advantage" of the pressure defferential come from increased flow? And from what I have read the slight rise is designed to slightly increase velocity. Its like the plenum spacer things..but that extra height was designed into the casting on ALL aftermarket plenums.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 10, 2007
#46
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #46
hotmustang331 said:
But doesnt that "advantage" of the pressure defferential come from increased flow? And from what I have read the slight rise is designed to slightly increase velocity. Its like the plenum spacer things..but that extra height was designed into the casting on ALL aftermarket plenums.
Click to expand...

Close. The increased flow comes from the advantage of the increased pressure differential. The different shape and taller design of the aftermarket plenums allows for a better chance of laminar airflow down into the lower intake manifold. At WOT, the absolute pressure inside the lower intake manifold is very close to the atmosphere absolute pressure. The closer you can get to a perfect laminar flow through the TB/plenum, the greater amount of air that can be drawn in to the lower intake manfold.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jan 10, 2007
#47
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #47
This mod has absolutely nothing to do with opening the throttle body further. It just moves the gas pedal. I did it several years ago. Good mod.

Forgot that I did it until I stumbled over this retro thread!
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 11, 2007
#48
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #48
007 said:
This mod has absolutely nothing to do with opening the throttle body further. It just moves the gas pedal. I did it several years ago. Good mod.

Forgot that I did it until I stumbled over this retro thread!
Click to expand...

It also places undue tension on the factory throttle cable and also places undue tension of the throttle linkage and the blade shaft. With the increased rate of opening the throttle, you will also be slamming the linkage against the stop much harder than normal when you are going through the gears. In my opinion, I wouldn't consider that good. The gas pedal is where it is at for a reason.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jan 11, 2007
#49
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #49
LaserRed01GT said:
It also places undue tension on the factory throttle cable and also places undue tension of the throttle linkage and the blade shaft. With the increased rate of opening the throttle, you will also be slamming the linkage against the stop much harder than normal when you are going through the gears. In my opinion, I wouldn't consider that good. The gas pedal is where it is at for a reason.
Click to expand...

Like San said - we did it YEARS ago. No probs. I think your worrying about nothing. Youll break the crappy plastic pedal before anything else. Loads of folks do that.
 

AmBo

Active Member
Feb 3, 2004
1,027
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 11, 2007
#50
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #50
So wait, does this pull the pedal UP (towards you?)? As my gas pedal sits about an inch lower than my brake. and don't get me started on the clutch...
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jan 11, 2007
#51
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #51
AmBo said:
So wait, does this pull the pedal UP (towards you?)? As my gas pedal sits about an inch lower than my brake. and don't get me started on the clutch...
Click to expand...

Yup. Its that simple.
 

AmBo

Active Member
Feb 3, 2004
1,027
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 11, 2007
#52
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #52
interesting...i'll have to check this out come the spring. Maybe i'll do it when I do my clutch adjustment as I'll be under the dash already as it is. What a horrible place to work. lol
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
Jan 11, 2007
#53
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #53
This mod is completely useless unless you're looking for a difference in heal-toe feel. It nets zero performance gains! Anyone claiming gains in performance is lying to themselves. Show me the dyno results!

BTW, the throttle cables do NOT stretch. If there is slack in the cable, something else is wrong, possibly a bent throttle cable bracket or bent pedal. This cable is not a monofilliment line, it's braded cable...it doesn't stretch.

This "mod" has been out there for a long time, and has been de-bunked in numerous discussions.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 11, 2007
#54
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #54
007 said:
Like San said - we did it YEARS ago. No probs. I think your worrying about nothing. Youll break the crappy plastic pedal before anything else. Loads of folks do that.
Click to expand...

I was a service writer for a Ford/Mazda Dealership in San Antonio, TX for a while. You would be surprised to know how many kids come in with their trucks and cars and have broken their throttle cable, linkage, or TB shaft because of doing this. Don't think so myoscopically and assume that just because yourself and a few others you know have had no problems, that some people out of the millions of other Ford owner haven't had a problem as a result of doing this. This mod borders on ricer mentality in my opinion.

Like Steed said above, the stock cable does not stretch. By placing abnormal stress on it like this, you are just asking to break something.

Is the gas pedal being lower than the brake really that awkward for you guys?
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
Jan 11, 2007
#55
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #55
LaserRed01GT said:
... This mod borders on ricer mentality in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Bingo!
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jan 11, 2007
#56
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #56
LaserRed01GT said:
Don't think so myoscopically
Click to expand...

Thanks, I'll try not to.
 

GToddyT5

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
553
0
16
Hamilton, NJ
Jan 11, 2007
#57
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #57
LaserRed01GT said:
Ford purposely set up the throttle linkage/cable like that. What you guys aren't thinking about is that when your motor is running and you are out on the road and you stand on the loud pedal, the motor will torque over to the passenger side. This places additional tension on the throttle cable. Just because you can stand on the gas pedal when the car is parked without the motor running and the throttle linkage/bell crank doesn't hit the stop, doesn't mean that when you get on it on the street that the blade isn't fully opening. Ford knows this and intelligently engineered the throttle cable to be slightly loose. It's not wise to "falsely" increase" the tension.

The throttle blade is slightly elliptical, not round, it is not made to go perfectly flat. The throttle stop on the factory throttle body stops the blade right around 87°. The throttle stop on a linkage like the Acccufab is specifically engineered to open the blade precisely 88° as per their technical info in their literature I have. The reason for this is because the throttle blade is not supposed to be perfectly flat. If you look closely, there is a hump over the linkage shaft that runs through the middle of the throttle blade. Keeping the blade 1-3° from going flat. This optimizes the air flow (aerodynamics) over this “hump.”

Additionally the PCM begins to switch to WOT tables after an 80% throttle angle and significant load, and even if you manage to open the throttle blade slightly more (which is highly unlikely under operating conditions) you will not gain any aerodynamic advantage whatsoever, you will actually lose some aerodynamic advantage over the throttle blade. So with these things in mind, this mod sounds like it may not be productive, and in fact counterproductive.
Click to expand...

He just this thread.
 

'01 Steed

Founding Member
Aug 2, 2002
482
0
16
Michigan
Jan 11, 2007
#58
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #58
You got that right! (spoken like Cosmo Kramer)
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Jan 11, 2007
#59
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #59
LaserRed01GT said:
Is the gas pedal being lower than the brake really that awkward for you guys?
Click to expand...
Yes. Besides, coming up with a way to take up the slack and a designing a bump stop was fun.
 

40th GT

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
916
0
0
Lawrenceville, GA
Jan 11, 2007
#60
  • Jan 11, 2007
  • #60
LaserRed01GT said:
Ford purposely set up the throttle linkage/cable like that. What you guys aren't thinking about is that when your motor is running and you are out on the road and you stand on the loud pedal, the motor will torque over to the passenger side. This places additional tension on the throttle cable. Just because you can stand on the gas pedal when the car is parked without the motor running and the throttle linkage/bell crank doesn't hit the stop, doesn't mean that when you get on it on the street that the blade isn't fully opening. Ford knows this and intelligently engineered the throttle cable to be slightly loose. It's not wise to "falsely" increase" the tension.

The throttle blade is slightly elliptical, not round, it is not made to go perfectly flat. The throttle stop on the factory throttle body stops the blade right around 87°. The throttle stop on a linkage like the Acccufab is specifically engineered to open the blade precisely 88° as per their technical info in their literature I have. The reason for this is because the throttle blade is not supposed to be perfectly flat. If you look closely, there is a hump over the linkage shaft that runs through the middle of the throttle blade. Keeping the blade 1-3° from going flat. This optimizes the air flow (aerodynamics) over this “hump.”

Additionally the PCM begins to switch to WOT tables after an 80% throttle angle and significant load, and even if you manage to open the throttle blade slightly more (which is highly unlikely under operating conditions) you will not gain any aerodynamic advantage whatsoever, you will actually lose some aerodynamic advantage over the throttle blade. So with these things in mind, this mod sounds like it may not be productive, and in fact counterproductive.
Click to expand...
I think you just put an end to this gas pedal mod. Thanks for shedding the light!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Resolved Holley terminator integration into CCRM
  • BrandonMP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
252
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2026
BrandonMP
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
975
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
860
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
914
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?