• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Did you ever have an ORP marry itself to a set of headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ratio411
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2012

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 23, 2012
#1
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #1
We have a BBK H-pipe that ran on one set of shorties for a year or so, and now we are using the same H-pipe on a new set of headers, but they don't want to seal against the ball on the collector.

Have you ever had this happen?

I figure that it conformed the socket to the set of headers it was on before, and now it is biased and doesn't want to seal against the new ones.

If you have had this happen, how did you work it out?

The new set of headers are higher quality stainless steel, and look to me to have a slightly shallower ball connection. I suppose if that is true, the sockets on the H were stretched a bit, and the shorter ball connection cannot fill it out now.

After goofing with it for a while, we finally got the left side sealed, but the right side just won't cooperate.
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Dec 23, 2012
#2
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #2
I bought a set of stainless headers off of ebay, new. The looked great but the passenger side ball was welded onto the header at the wrong angle. Wouldn't seal no matter what. Tried everything. Took it off and laid it beside a known good header and it was obvious. WAY OFF. I was pissed. Sent them back for a refund. Drivers side fit well.
 
Reactions: ratio411

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 23, 2012
#3
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #3
These are Summit brand, but appear to be high quality.
We did not check the angle of the balls to the other set, which were also Summit brand, but the dirt cheap versions in thin mild steel and with crappy welds. This set is very nice, but being generic may have a similar issue...

How did your eBay set look as far as quality?
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Dec 23, 2012
#4
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #4
AWESOME quality. I was pissed. They fit everything perfect but the passenger side of the H-pipe. Nice welds, machined flanges etc. I would have loved to have them on. But now I have junk BBK that fit but look like poo.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 23, 2012
#5
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #5
Ball sockets tend to suck with age. Is it possible to trim the female lip to allow it to sit tighter?
 

Ronin38

Blow all the things!
15 Year Member
Dec 18, 2010
7,179
4,359
224
Dayton, OH
Dec 23, 2012
#6
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #6
Did you ever have an ORP marry itself to a set of headers?
Click to expand...

Only in West Virginia...


 
Reactions: ratio411

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 27, 2012
#7
  • Dec 27, 2012
  • #7
Okay, so we got it resolved.

The new headers, while very nice stainless steel, did have one flaw, the ball portion of the collector (for the ball and socket connection) was shallower than other headers, and they were also not very straight.

In order to get the BBK H-pipe to fit, after it had been mated to a set of headers with a better collector ball, we had to take a pair of pliers and bend the entire socket portion of the pipe over, so they would allow the shallow ball connections to sit further into the socket. I just bent the entire lip, all the way around the pipe, outwards about 1/8" or so.

Even though the left side eventually sealed, as noted in my original post, we ended up pulling it down and doing the same mod to it. I am glad we did too, because we could see the exhuast was just barely contained, and probably would have started leaking before long anyway. Better to get it sealed more permanently now while it was in the shop.

Really, with everything else on these headers being so 'right', they could have built the collectors so much better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
976
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Resolved Tapping sound on passenger side of engine
  • sav22rem22
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
sav22rem22
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?