• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

disconnet injectors for fuel savings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr.b
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
P

plainwrecknate

New Member
Jul 21, 2005
92
0
0
Fort Morgan, CO
Sep 3, 2005
#21
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #21
i say just drive like normal and pay the gas prices. and this is coming from a kid only making $100 a week at work. just put that gas in there and drive. if you want to save gas, buy one of those hondas.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Sep 3, 2005
#22
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #22
that's why I take the wife's civic whenever we go somewhere ...she's the sensible one-here I am getting ready to build a supercharged stroker with gas prices predicted to hit $4/gal in the near future-yeah that makes sense...
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
Sep 3, 2005
#23
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #23
plainwrecknate said:
i say just drive like normal and pay the gas prices. and this is coming from a kid only making $100 a week at work. just put that gas in there and drive. if you want to save gas, buy one of those hondas.
Click to expand...

Thats what i did lol but here gas is hitting close to 8 dollars a gallon (6.80 US) so uhhhh yeah the stang is staying in the garage for a while. My integra gets about 20 mpg more than my stang so i'll drive that to work for now.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Sep 3, 2005
#24
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #24
I guess I need to explain this a little better, because you will see better fuel economy with the throttle plate more open.

First, engine efficiency is power made per unit of fuel used. This is different than fuel economy which is distance traveled per unit of fuel used. I am talking about engine efficiency. This does not take into account aero losses. But remember that at any given speed the vehicle will get its best fuel economy when operating at max engine efficiency.

Any restriction on the air intake passage will decrease engine efficiency. When the restriction is at the TB the restriction is known as Throttling Losses. The diesel is more efficient than gasoline engines, and part of the reason is that there are no throttling losses in the diesel. This is a very basic idea to wrap your mind around...Which would you call more efficient, breathing through a straw, or breathing through a garden hose? Which would mean less work/effort for you?
The amount of fuel used for increasing the throttle opening is not the issue. The issue is how much parasitic drag (as a result of having to pull air through a small opening) the engine has to overcome to fill the cylinder with air. Opening the throttle reduces this parasitic drag on the engine, which increases engine efficiency. As a result of less parasitic drag on the motor, engine efficiency will increase when the throttle is opened further (remember that engine efficiency is power made per unit of fuel used).
Driving habits need to change to take full advantage of this. For max economy the rpm range should be kept as low as the engine will tolerate. For my engine this is about 1600rpm. This means I shift well before the 2500 mark. If you keep the throttle open at about 75% then, yes, you will accelerate. This allows for another driving technique called Coast and Burn. When driving at 65mph you will accelerate at 75% throttle to about 70mph, then you disengage the trans and coast until you reach 60mph, and repeat. The "Burn" portion keeps the engine operating at peak efficiency, and the "Coast" portion reduces engine revolutions per mile traveled (which has large impact on fuel used per mile traveled). This driving style was made mandatory in some Asian countries in the 80s/90s (Japan if I remember correct).
Gear selection is crucial for this to work properly. Obviously accelerating to 65mph in third gear will not be as efficient as in fifth gear. Again use the lowest rpm range that the motor will accept. Also, consider the speed you are selecting to maintain. Aero losses will be greater at 75 than at 60mph.

If you have more questions on this please repost, or pm me. I have a degree in Auto Design, and I am very willing to share the knowledge that I have gained over the years.

I am still looking for the article I read a while back on the Chrysler system, but I seem to be missing some of my SAE magazines, so I may not be much help here.

jason
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
154
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
A
Resolved Fuel pressure high at 52 new FPR same thing
  • afjLX
  • Dec 28, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
90
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
133
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
702
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?