GelatiCruiser said:I think it looks odd all around. I mean...sometimes I see it and it's swete looking....but sometimes I see it and I want to puke. I can't explain it. But it would look AWESOME with the mirrors and handles/locks shaved.
Cook89Notch said:I just think they are to big and goofy looking.
What do you all think?
Thanks, Matt.
All right, all right you got me!pony542 said:Hmmmm .... looking at a mirror and seeing "big and goofy". Got to ask, were you looking at the housing, or starring into the glass surface when you saw this big and goofy thing??
Sorry, couldn't pass that one up. All kidding aside, I do see your point.
I'm not sure about that, but they sure do look like they were!ryanrule said:arent they taken from the f150?
Please, put down the crack pipe. Or post pictures to back up this nonsense.ryanrule said:arent they taken from the f150?
ryanrule said:arent they taken from the f150?
calvado said:what's the point in trying to modify the car to make it look better..
it looks ugly period...
it looks cheap
it looks like an old camaro
it's outdated even before it's out
mirror, front and rear bumper, hood...everything need to be redesign...
.....
sweet~Low~93 said:Where do you see ANYTHING that looks like a Camaro
GT-03 said:Well, actually, the lack of rear side windows looks more like a Camaro/Firebird than a Mustang.
For most model years, the Camaro/Firebird didn't have rear side windows, but instead a large "C" pillar. For most model years, the Mustang did have rear side windows. I am saying "most model years" because I know there are exceptions, but those are rare.
This is why, in this respect, the 2005 Mustang has a look which is more like Camaro. I guess Ford is trying to win-over Camaro/Firebird owners with that look.
BTW, opera windows inserted into the "C" pillars don't count as rear side windows.