• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Does anyone have a stroked 4.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piston
  • Start date Start date Mar 16, 2004

Piston

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
215
0
0
Chicago Suburbs
Mar 16, 2004
#1
  • Mar 16, 2004
  • #1
I am not sure how reliable a stroked mod motor would be. Coast High Performance offers a 5.1L/310 Cubes stroker kit, has anyone had good experiences with Coast? This would be for a mostly street application, and also see some track time. I though I have heard before that the stroker motors for the 4.6 are not that street friendly, maybe it depends on the cams. I would assume that I would also need to port a set of PI's pretty well also to get the most out of the motor. I like my 98 GT alot, but the lack of good power options for this car makes me wanna buy a 03/04 Cobra. Any help would be great.
 

Piston

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
215
0
0
Chicago Suburbs
Mar 16, 2004
#2
  • Mar 16, 2004
  • #2
Disregard the car info at the bottom. This is Piston's friend.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Mar 16, 2004
#3
  • Mar 16, 2004
  • #3
well don't take thins a gospel truth, but i have heard this from several different sources & someone i trust as well. but stroking a 4.6 is actually not the best thing to do for it. the stroke on a 4.6 is actually just a hair longer than optimal as it sits, so if you extend it it can actually cost power in the upper power band. it will make good tq but not necessarily hp. a big bore is supposed to be the best route to persue if you are wanting to stay n/a & add cubes.
i personally am either looking to replace my engine with one of vt engines 324 motors, or trade mine for a 03-04 cobra. if i have mis-spoke i'm sure somone will jump in & correct me
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Mar 17, 2004
#4
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #4
T&J Performance built Michael Kidds car with a VT enigines stroker kit. He made 663 Hp with a vortech T-trim. You can see his car's info on their website. www.modularfordpowerhouse.com
 

stallion98gt

New Member
May 12, 2003
1,802
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Mar 17, 2004
#5
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #5
[QUOTE='96&'01Stang]T&J Performance built Michael Kidds car with a VT enigines stroker kit. He made 663 Hp with a vortech T-trim. You can see his car's info on their website. www.modularfordpowerhouse.com[/QUOTE]
nuff said
 

red98_gt

New Member
Mar 15, 2004
69
0
0
Mar 17, 2004
#6
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #6
To me...the 4.6 is begging for cubic inches, so I would imagine that stroker kit would be pretty benifical for it. I have heard stories of big big numbers..I think the 4.6 has a lot of unlocked potential!
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Mar 17, 2004
#7
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #7
I love my stroker. 663 is the tip of the iceberg too. More to come.
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Mar 17, 2004
#8
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #8
From what I've experienced and seen, stroking the modulars is the only way to go (and add a big bore too while you're at it ). Theory is one thing, real world #'s is another
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Mar 17, 2004
#9
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #9
VTEngine said:
From what I've experienced and seen, stroking the modulars is the only way to go (and add a big bore too while you're at it ). Theory is one thing, real world #'s is another
Click to expand...


that is very good to hear, especially with someone i know, knows what they are talking about
 

jeff1414

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
447
0
0
Sacramento
Mar 17, 2004
#10
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #10
Would it still be emmision legal if stock heads and cams were transfered. Would it run alright with the stock stuff and a good tune???? I live in cali I would would love that motor vtengine gots but got to make sure i can pass smog?????
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Mar 17, 2004
#11
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #11
jeff1414 said:
Would it still be emmision legal if stock heads and cams were transfered. Would it run alright with the stock stuff and a good tune???? I live in cali I would would love that motor vtengine gots but got to make sure i can pass smog?????
Click to expand...

Honestly, if you're going to leave stock heads/cams on the motor, then you'll gain tons down low, but top end HP will hinder. A big bore would be the best way for you to get added cubes and still increase top end power. If you were doing to do heads/cams, or had a power adder, then the stroker would be fine. No problem with emissions if you have the stock top end components in place. Check out 5.0Magazine from a month ago, we did a large stroker build up in there with stock heads/cams, and then added our heads/cams. Very good information there.
 

jeff1414

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
447
0
0
Sacramento
Mar 17, 2004
#12
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #12
VTEngine said:
Honestly, if you're going to leave stock heads/cams on the motor, then you'll gain tons down low, but top end HP will hinder. A big bore would be the best way for you to get added cubes and still increase top end power. If you were doing to do heads/cams, or had a power adder, then the stroker would be fine. No problem with emissions if you have the stock top end components in place. Check out 5.0Magazine from a month ago, we did a large stroker build up in there with stock heads/cams, and then added our heads/cams. Very good information there.
Click to expand...

Yeh i read that very good #'s. I am going to go with a supercharger with the new engine. so if i go with the power adder and the stroker do you think i will be ok with the stock stuff and the smog. Sorry about all the Q just want to make sure from the man himself before I start spending!!
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Mar 17, 2004
#13
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #13
If you're going blower, then for sure go stroker with the stock top end (heads/cams). It'll be a nice little street beast
 

jeff1414

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
447
0
0
Sacramento
Mar 17, 2004
#14
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #14
Thanks for the info. That would be a nice street setup.. I will be looking into that really soon. The only problem is to find a good tuner around my parts..
 

jeff1414

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
447
0
0
Sacramento
Mar 17, 2004
#15
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #15
Is there anyway you can pm me the details of the engine. hows the durability and the limits on the engine thanks
Jeff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
704
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
M
4.6 2v ready to go in.
  • Michael007
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2024
Mustang5L5
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?