• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

does mandrel bent pipe really make a difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen4785
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2004

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Jul 4, 2004
#1
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #1
Iv got a 65 coupe with a 302 and Im gonna replace my exhaust system with some try y's,H pipe,dual mufflers to tips @ the rear valance.Should I buy a mandrel bent pipes for the whole system?I know there's less restriction but my car's not gonna have more than 400hp ever.And is there a big diffrence in the sound of mandrel bent pipes?
The reason I ask this is because I work at an exhaust shop and can build my own pipes for next to nothing.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Jul 4, 2004
#2
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #2
Yes. Mandrel bends, like you said, have less restriction, which is good if you're making 50hp or 500hp. They're going to sound more throaty as well.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 4, 2004
#3
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #3
Mandrel bent means it doesn't kink in the corners. With regular exaust shop bent pipes when your exaust gasses flow towards a corner, they have to condence down, speed throught the curve then back out into the larger pipe loosing velosity. Hard to explain but basically the bends act as kinks which kills flow and velosity.
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Jul 4, 2004
#4
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #4
easy way to explain it:

2.5" mandrel bent piping stays 2.5" in diameter through every turn, bend, and twist.

Normal piping will get smaller around turns, bends, and twists, which can be quite restrictive. I would strongly recommend mandrel bent.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 4, 2004
#5
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #5
it is funny that you are asking since you work at an exhaust shop.

if i did, i would have some crazy exhaust on my cars.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jul 4, 2004
#6
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #6
me 2
 

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Jul 4, 2004
#7
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #7
Well I knew what mandrel bending is I just didnt know if it made that much of a power difference or sound.Im not expecting my car to run super impressive track times or anything but I do want it to sound awsome.I thought that mandrel bending would sound better becaust of the straight through constant pipe diameter.I havent been working in this shop that long and the other guys at my shop are foaming at the mouth to let them rig up an exhaust for my car by bending up a bunch of 2 1/2-3 inch pipe.I dont really trust the guys that much because they have the cheaper is better attitude.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 5, 2004
#8
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #8
stephen4785 said:
Well I knew what mandrel bending is I just didnt know if it made that much of a power difference or sound.Im not expecting my car to run super impressive track times or anything but I do want it to sound awsome.I thought that mandrel bending would sound better becaust of the straight through constant pipe diameter.I havent been working in this shop that long and the other guys at my shop are foaming at the mouth to let them rig up an exhaust for my car by bending up a bunch of 2 1/2-3 inch pipe.I dont really trust the guys that much because they have the cheaper is better attitude.
Click to expand...
ok, that makes sense (in my first post, i was sorta' curious and a little confused. i would have imagined that we would be asking you. )

but i applaud your having asked in here and not blindly takin the word of some guys at work. i dont know much about exhausts, but i would go the mandrel route. you want consistancy and some engineering, not necessarily a sewer-drain-pipe with kinks and ID inconsistancies, that may mess with backpressure, scavenging, and so on.
my two cents. good luck.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 5, 2004
#9
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #9
At the HP levels you're contemplating, even non-mandrel bent 2.5" duals will be plenty. Bend it up yourself and you'll be fine. Removing exhaust restrictions with mandrel bent ells only helps if the exhaust size you're running is limiting your abililty to flow - and 400HP through dual 2.5" isn't going to pose a flow restriction. Heck - F-body's with the LS1, and new Dodge and Nissan pickups are all running 320-345HP through SINGLE 2.75"-3" exhaust systems.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Jul 5, 2004
#10
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #10
Mike's right!! bend away with the 2 1/2 pipes!! it is funny to spend 200-300 on a system for a 300 HP car!! I have a killer shop here in Jax do all my exhaust work and when I uncap at the track.. the gain is almost nothing as to capped and thru the system!! have fun and keep the bends to a min!! cool??

Just me.....................................

Thumper
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 5, 2004
#11
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #11
I just read an article about a stroker LS1 in a late model Firebird - making almost 500 rwhp on spray; he runs long tubes, 2.5" head pipes into a single 3" out to single muffler transversely mounted in back. Car runs consistent high tens. Dual 2.5" pipes even bent on the regular ole bending machine will be fine. As Thumper says, just don't bend it any more than you have to.
 
3

351crules

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
19
0
0
chicopee,mass
Jul 5, 2004
#12
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #12
i've gone 108mph in the quarter n/a 302 with duel 2 1/4 unmandrel bent pipes, tailpipes and no cross pipe. then i took off the exhaust and when just 1 mph faster.
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
Puyallup, WA
Jul 5, 2004
#13
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #13
www.pypesexhaust.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Exhaust Bbk mid pipe and flowmaster catback fitment issues?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jun 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
948
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
dqureshi06
D
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
649
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Turbo or Chambered mufflers?
  • limp
  • Feb 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2024
limp
Fuel AFR is driving me nuts
  • BotchedNotch
  • Mar 22, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
924
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2024
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?