• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Does this block look like crap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StreetDreamsGT
  • Start date Start date Oct 28, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

StreetDreamsGT

New Member
Mar 6, 2003
449
0
0
New Jersey
Oct 28, 2004
#1
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #1
I was browsin through ebay and found this, what do you guys think? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33615&item=7929988136&rd=1
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 28, 2004
#2
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #2
looks ok to me...in order to magnaflux a block i think it must be hot tanked and cleaned first....so i dont think you r gonna get a dirty block.
 
H

helpmelogin

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
8
0
0
Oct 28, 2004
#3
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #3
Sounds awful cheap for a rebuild. Also with the"Comp. Ratios With Cyl. Heads: 51cc=9.7; 54cc=9.3; 58cc=8.8; 64cc=8.3; 69cc=7.8."
You better have som really small combustion chambers to make any compression.
I would do some more reasearch on the company before buying.
 

84blkstang

Member
Jun 4, 2003
544
1
18
Springfield MO
Oct 28, 2004
#4
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #4
i doubt with those parts it is gonna make that much HP just my thoughts.....
 

StreetDreamsGT

New Member
Mar 6, 2003
449
0
0
New Jersey
Oct 28, 2004
#5
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #5
aren't the hyper. pistons used supposed to be not as good or something? One of my last posts people had been saying forged was better.
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Oct 28, 2004
#6
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #6
looks OK to me too but is there another option for different pistons that could be run through it?? 56cc's to make decent (9.0ish)?!
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Oct 28, 2004
#7
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #7
ninety15.0 said:
looks ok to me...in order to magnaflux a block i think it must be hot tanked and cleaned first....so i dont think you r gonna get a dirty block.
Click to expand...

WHAT ARE YOU TAKLKING ABOUGHT A DIRTY BLOCK
 
J

jd351

Founding Member
Feb 20, 2002
163
1
0
Everett, WA
Oct 29, 2004
#8
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #8
Sounds like a fairly stock re-build. The pistons should be fine for all but +9psi boosted set-ups. As for the C/R quotes, I don't quite believe them, I do not know or a KB piston that matches this. The big dish ones would be lower than that, and the stock replacement and flat top ones would be higher. I would assume they are the same as stock. But I would ask them what the piston is to be sure (ask what CC measurement for the dish and/or valve pockets of these pistons is).

KB makes a very good Hypereutectic piston, and should be fine unless you abuse them.

For that price, if i'ts any good (quality of work that is) than it's a deal, but shipping is going to hurt.
 
S

SiRSluRpEE

New Member
Oct 18, 2004
4
0
0
Oct 29, 2004
#9
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #9
"360+hp rating was 308 shortblock motor with Aluminum GT-40 58cc heads w/ 1.6 Roller Rockers, Hydraulic Roller Wolverine 1087 0.514"/0.514" lift & 228 / 228 duration camshaft, Holley Systemax II Induction setup, 30lb Injectors w/ matching 75mm Mass Air, 2 1/2" Exhaust"
 

89roadster

Founding Member
Apr 19, 1999
1,124
0
0
Kent Island, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#10
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #10
Yeah, they do a little bait-and-switch there. They say the block can produce 360, but not with the cam they put into it by default.

That alone would make me not trust them...just my $.02.

Is the cam that they specify even an H.O. cam?
 
H

helpmelogin

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
8
0
0
Oct 29, 2004
#11
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #11
89roadster said:
Is the cam that they specify even an H.O. cam?
Click to expand...
It says it is ground to stock specs......But I guess its not a stock cam.
 

NYC LSC

Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
626
0
0
Staten Island, NYC
Oct 29, 2004
#12
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #12
I dunno if I'd wanted a block that's already been bored .040" over. God forbid something happens and you need to bore the cylinders.

.040" over is pretty much the max on a 302, right?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 29, 2004
#13
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #13
shttygtstang said:
WHAT ARE YOU TAKLKING ABOUGHT A DIRTY BLOCK
Click to expand...

blah
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 29, 2004
#14
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #14
$hit....nevermind anything i have said in this post....i obviously didnt read what he wrote....i should stop drinkin and smokin....i thought it said brownish not browsin. forget it.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Oct 29, 2004
#15
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #15
NYC LSC said:
I dunno if I'd wanted a block that's already been bored .040" over. God forbid something happens and you need to bore the cylinders.

.040" over is pretty much the max on a 302, right?
Click to expand...

.060 over is max for the street.
 

NYC LSC

Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
626
0
0
Staten Island, NYC
Oct 29, 2004
#16
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #16
Ahh ok, thanks for the info. Even still, I'd pass.
 

StreetDreamsGT

New Member
Mar 6, 2003
449
0
0
New Jersey
Oct 29, 2004
#17
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #17
How much does it cost to have a block bored over? If I was to provide the block and a stroker kit?
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Oct 29, 2004
#18
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #18
here it cost 80 bucks to bore and hone it. 10 a hole. that does not include a hottanking and new bearings and freeze plugs installed though. if you have enough to buy that ebay motor, you definately have enough to get it machined.
 

PNY PWR

New Member
Jul 23, 2004
522
0
0
Wichita, KS
Oct 29, 2004
#19
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #19
Don't like the hyper pistons and there's no way to quote HP #'s on a short block, they should've left that out.
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
Oct 29, 2004
#20
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #20
I got a engine for my last mustang from these guys maybe a year ago. Nothing but good experiences with them, and didnt have a single prob with the engine the whole time I owned it. Dont knock it caz there cheap, I guess they make up for the low price by quantity.
Basically, the engine is built to be stock in every way there is. They model the 5.0 they sell after the 93 mustang 5.0 block.
eg; hyper pistons
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Cooling Jacket Pitting Idea's?
  • BoostedRed89gt
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
316
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2026
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2026
from6to8
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
854
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?