• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Dr. Gas X-pipe without cats or with?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RacinChris
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2004
R

RacinChris

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2000
274
0
16
Gainesville, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#1
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #1
Hey guys, I just wanted to hear some opinions. The one thing I know for sure is that I want a Dr. Gas X-pipe . Ideally, I'd like to have no cats and no mufflers, kinda like stock cars at the local track, similar to NASCAR (they have boom tubes though), and exactly how John Buscema's cobra was most recently. I've been warned that this would sound extremely loud, especially at WOT. I think it would be okay at idle - 1500 RPMs, though, wouldn't it? Anyhow, if that's too loud and would get me pulled over by cops all the time, then I'm looking at a few options:

1. Put some cats on. Still no mufflers.
2. Mufflers. Still no cats. And if it comes to this, I'll either get Flowmaster original 40s or Dynomax Race Bullets. From what I hear, the Dr. Gas + Flowmaster combo is pretty wicked. Haven't heard any Dr. Gas + Dynomax race bullet clips, but it's a straight-through design that might leave the exhaust tone similar to what it'd be without mufflers.

Thoughts? Opinions? I'm interested in what it'd sound like with cats and no mufflers. Would the exhaust tone be much different?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 11, 2004
#2
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #2
The cats will quiet it down a fair bit and rob about 10hp.

If emissions are not a concern don't use the cats, it will be louder at idle and will be fairly loud at WOT. You can control the tone by the muffler used, a 3 chamber Flowmaster would keep it quieter, then a 2 Chamber, and a Bullet would be the loudest.

The Bullet would rob power on your set-up, stay with a chambered muffler and remember a Flowmaster needs around 13" of pipe after the muffler to have the required back pressure (Not sure if you were going to run dumps).

IMO on your set-up I would add a set of 1.625" headers, 2.5" X-pipe (any brand, the Dr.Gas set-up is nice but needs to be welded and fabricated a little), and a 2.5" MAC Flowpath Cat-back.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 11, 2004
#3
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #3
dont mean to hijack your thread, but i read something interesting.

you need 13" after the muffler on flowmasters? i have flowmasters on mine, and just the 1-2" outlet, nothing more. is that hurting my performance?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 11, 2004
#4
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #4
I got the info straight from Flowmaster a few years ago.....

I believe it was listed in the literature as well...

Interesting huh?
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 11, 2004
#5
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #5
yeah that is, i have tried tailpipes several times. first 2 times they were just **** and wouldnt work, last ones wouldnt clear my tires.

ill check out there site. thanks
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Oct 11, 2004
#6
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #6
"Tailpipes aid in keeping atmospheric pressure from rushing back into the muffler. Tailpipes can improve performance and control sound. In addition, tailpipe length can affect the power as well as sound. Tailpipes shold be a minimum or 10", and not longer than 6' Tailpipe length of more than 6' may need a resonator."

damn.. there is directly what it has on their site. guess ill look into some extensions
 
R

RacinChris

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2000
274
0
16
Gainesville, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#7
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #7
Rick 91GT said:
The cats will quiet it down a fair bit and rob about 10hp.

If emissions are not a concern don't use the cats, it will be louder at idle and will be fairly loud at WOT. You can control the tone by the muffler used, a 3 chamber Flowmaster would keep it quieter, then a 2 Chamber, and a Bullet would be the loudest.

The Bullet would rob power on your set-up, stay with a chambered muffler and remember a Flowmaster needs around 13" of pipe after the muffler to have the required back pressure (Not sure if you were going to run dumps).

IMO on your set-up I would add a set of 1.625" headers, 2.5" X-pipe (any brand, the Dr.Gas set-up is nice but needs to be welded and fabricated a little), and a 2.5" MAC Flowpath Cat-back.
Click to expand...
Emissions are not a concern .

Why would bullets rob power on my setup? I thought straight-through mufflers were supposed to be better than chambered mufflers when it comes to power.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 11, 2004
#8
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #8
Yes straight throuigh mufflers on a RACE car will make more peak power. Your set-up is fairly stock and the backpressure will help greatly on the street.
 
R

RacinChris

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2000
274
0
16
Gainesville, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#9
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #9
Ohhh, ok. How would it be with just an x-pipe, no mufflers?
 

larrendeuce

Member
Sep 13, 2003
649
1
19
Southern NJ
Oct 11, 2004
#10
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #10
You want mufflers, they will help your performance. What is up with the 1/4 mile times? Did you have all your spark plugs in?
 
R

RacinChris

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2000
274
0
16
Gainesville, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#11
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #11
larrendeuce said:
You want mufflers, they will help your performance. What is up with the 1/4 mile times? Did you have all your spark plugs in?
Click to expand...
I've only been to the track once, and it turns out my car had more issues than I realized. It's had a vacuum leak ever since I got it back in February. I just got that fixed today . Oh yeah, the spark plugs, wires, distributor cap & rotor ... all originals. No kidding. . And, as the signature mentions, I was using 93 octane with stock timing, so I probably lost a little bit there.

Now that I've gotten the vacuum leak fixed, I'm planning on doing a good tune-up. I promise to have better numbers next time!
 
8

88gtvertboy

New Member
Aug 16, 2004
23
0
0
maple valley wa.
Oct 12, 2004
#12
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #12
You dont need no stinking cats man!!!! Plus it sounds way meaner w/o those stupid cats...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
962
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
D
Exhaust
  • Domkami
  • Feb 10, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 14, 2023
General karthief
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Exhaust recommendations to save my poor aging ears.
  • CWBx
  • Sep 3, 2021
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 30, 2021
96stangfl
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?