Dyno Numbers - your opinions please...

Well like discussed in a prvious thread all Stangs dyno a little different. How much variance could be a little up for grabs. Maybe your engine is on the high side of the stock range? :shrug:

If so consider yourself one of the lucky ones. :nice:
 
A little different yes but that's way out. Keep in mind this is a Mustang Dyno not a DynoJet, it typically loads the cars and reads 10% low. On a DynoJet this would be over 300 RWHP and I've never seen any 3 or 4 valve car over 300 RWHP without a mid-pipe, mufflers, and a good tune. I'd say the dyno isn't calbrated or this is STD numbers.
 
ttown said:
A little different yes but that's way out. Keep in mind this is a Mustang Dyno not a DynoJet, it typically loads the cars and reads 10% low. On a DynoJet this would be over 300 RWHP and I've never seen any 3 or 4 valve car over 300 RWHP without a mid-pipe, mufflers, and a good tune. I'd say the dyno isn't calbrated or this is STD numbers.



I agree.
 
On a Mustang chassis dyno ?? with just the few mods you've done so far ? NO WAY..you couldn't even get those numbers on a dynojet, unless whoever tuned your car really leaned out your A/F mixture ?.. Speaking of which, did you get your A/F checked ?? if you happen to notice any type of knock and ping, I'd advise that you get it checked out as soon as possible :shrug:
 
I'm with radtexas you could have a factory wonder on your hands. I used to own
an '89 5.0 Coupe T-5 3.08 gear K&N panel, otherwise bonestock including timing. Well that little wonder pulled like it had at least 3.73's. I know what your thinking, another butt dyno testimony, but I wouldn't rule anything out.