dyno numbers

hernandez

New Member

Jan 15, 2006

44

0

0

Jul 23, 2006

#1

• Jul 23, 2006

• #1

to day i dynoed my 94 gt and made 258.64 rwhp and 286.95 rwtq, mods are 306, 70mm CAI, 65mm T-Body, F 303, Edelbroc RPM Heads and Intake, 19lb injectors, BBK Equal Length Headers, 4.10s, 1.7 Roller Rockers. Do the numbers look right or should there been more horsepower and torque

 

fiveoho

15 Year Member

Apr 28, 2005

1,958

16

69

TN

Jul 23, 2006

#2

• Jul 23, 2006

• #2

sounds a little on the low side to me considering your mods....

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Jul 23, 2006

#3

• Jul 23, 2006

• #3

Yeah with my H/C/I set up i put down 298rwhp and 326rwtq. Were u super lean or something? Your injectors are too small for your combo.

 

mootang

New Member

Dec 5, 2004

907

0

0

texas

Jul 23, 2006

#4

• Jul 23, 2006

• #4

deffinatly sounds low for your mods!

 

hernandez

New Member

Jan 15, 2006

44

0

0

Jul 23, 2006

#5

• Jul 23, 2006

• #5

i thought so , what do you guys think i should do to get my hp up?

 

S

sage2k

Member

May 23, 2005

645

0

16

Baton Rouge, LA

Jul 23, 2006

#6

• Jul 23, 2006

• #6

injectors/maf and tune

 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.

Nov 8, 2003

2,120

2

59

windsor, Canada

Jul 23, 2006

#7

• Jul 23, 2006

• #7

Numbers might come up a bit with some time on the dyno playing with A/F and timing...but IMO if it drives well and the curve was good/car's fun to drive...I wouldn't touch the valve covers.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Jul 23, 2006

#8

• Jul 23, 2006

• #8

It would be helpful to know if you got an auto or stick trans

Grady

 

9

94gtslow

Founding Member

Jan 26, 2002

401

0

0

Temple,Texas

Jul 23, 2006

#9

• Jul 23, 2006

• #9

sounds a little low, what was the air/fuel ratio?

And aslo what kind of transmision do you have, there are a lot or variables.

 

mootang

New Member

Dec 5, 2004

907

0

0

texas

Jul 23, 2006

#10

• Jul 23, 2006

• #10

he has a T-56 according to his sig!

 

hernandez

New Member

Jan 15, 2006

44

0

0

Jul 23, 2006

#11

• Jul 23, 2006

• #11

it has a t-5 with heavy duty gears, and the t56 is in my other mustang, my air/fuel was around 13.3-13.5

 

mootang

New Member

Dec 5, 2004

907

0

0

texas

Jul 23, 2006

#12

• Jul 23, 2006

• #12

what is your base timing? also what kind of dyno was it? mustang dyno maybe?

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Jul 23, 2006

#13

• Jul 23, 2006

• #13

Mid 13's is kind of on the lean side for NA engines. All engines are different, but typically from what I've seen an A/F ratio in the high 12's to low 13's will produce the most power on street H/C/I setups. Throw some fuel at it and see what happens.

mootang said:

what is your base timing? also what kind of dyno was it? mustang dyno maybe?

Click to expand...

Very good questions.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Jul 23, 2006

#14

• Jul 23, 2006

• #14

hernandez said:

it has a t-5 with heavy duty gears, and the t56 is in my other mustang, my air/fuel was around 13.3-13.5

Click to expand...

I see I was correct in my assumption you were talking about different Stangs

I'm with Paul about a fatter ratio producing more ponies.

The other Q's about dyno type and how you had your spark setup certainly can effect final hp/tq values.

Those 19's are tooooooooooo small

With those 410's ...at WOT ... a heavy load in say 3rd/4th gear with rpm's rising quickly ... you'll have conditions very favorable to produce lean ratios ... even the more so if you still got the little oem pump.

You need more fuel .......... period

At the VERY LEAST ..... work those little 19 with more pressure

Grady

 

hernandez

New Member

Jan 15, 2006

44

0

0

Jul 23, 2006

#15

• Jul 23, 2006

• #15

just bought some 24lb injectors and a 70mm tbody w/tfs elbow, as for the maf it was a 75mm not 70mm. i hope this will put me up to par