• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dyno results

  • Thread starter Thread starter pwcracer
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2007

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Apr 28, 2007
#1
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #1
Today was the first day I had my car tuned on the dyno. What I found out, is my 255 lph pump is not keeping up with the fuel demands at full boost/rpm.. He thought it might be the filter, so he kept it a bit conservative on the dyno. He said once i fix the fuel issue, he thinks it will do 340-350..

Has anyone had problems with the 255 fuel pumps like this, or can you recommend a better solution?
 

Attachments

  • dyno 009.webp
    12.4 KB · Views: 191

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 28, 2007
#2
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #2
pwcracer said:
Today was the first day I had my car tuned on the dyno. What I found out, is my 255 lph pump is not keeping up with the fuel demands at full boost/rpm.. He thought it might be the filter, so he kept it a bit conservative on the dyno. He said once i fix the fuel issue, he thinks it will do 340-350..

Has anyone had problems with the 255 fuel pumps like this, or can you recommend a better solution?
Click to expand...

Makes absoutely no sense to me... That fuel pump is MORE than enough...

Let's use the formula that says


horsepower (HP) = lb/hr (fuel) / BSFC
If we assume BSFC of .5, then HP = 2 * lb/hr. Then, if we round the weight of a pound of fuel to 6 pounds HP = 12 * gal/hr. So, if we assume .5 BSFC, then you can actually multiply the numbers in the flow charts by 12 to compute supported horsepower.

For example, If you look up the flow rate of the 190 ltr/hr pump in the Technical section, you will see that it will push 36 gal/hr at 50 psi with a 12 VDC power source. If your engine is pumping out 500 hp when the fuel pressure is 50 psi [@ 12VDC], you probably won't want to use the 190 ltr/hr pump [36 * 12 = 432].

------

Correct me if I am wrong but 255 puts out 58 gallons per hour at 40psi = 58*12= 696 HP. ?
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 28, 2007
#3
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #3
Was I reading the afr wrong? It looks like it was way rich to me.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Apr 28, 2007
#4
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #4
86bluecobra said:
Was I reading the afr wrong? It looks like it was way rich to me.
Click to expand...

looks rich to me as well ... the graph for the afr is showing 11.0 up until 5000rpms
 

SVT3183

Member
Mar 30, 2005
180
0
16
S Jersey
Apr 28, 2007
#5
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #5
how much boost are you pushing, what kb model is it, and what type of lower manifold?
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Apr 28, 2007
#6
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #6
He hooked up a fuel gauge to the fuel rails and showed me the pump dropping fuel pressure at higher rpm.. It could be a bad pump too.

I have a kb 1.5 with the gt lower intake..
7 lb
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Apr 29, 2007
#7
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #7
I wouldent be surprised if its a fuel filter.....I'm making almost as much power as you w/ a 190 lph pump. Although my car is N/A...but still, that pump should be plenty.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Apr 29, 2007
#8
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #8
not terribly rich for forced induction 11.0 is considered a safe afr for boost, 12,0 being almost lean, alot of people rund 11.5:1 on FI.

The fuel pump should keep up with it no problem.
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Apr 29, 2007
#9
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #9
His power is not that low. 340-350 should be pretty spot on for that combo.

I made 385/415 with a KB at 8# with a 255 pump 38# inj. My issue was a pegged MAF from going any higher. That was Stock SB AFR 165's Crower 15511 and Ported GT40 with the KB2200 Blowzilla.

I was hoping to break 400 with a KB...just wasn't in the cards.

You won't pull much past 5500 anyway, depending on your pulley combo. Those suckers build some heat. On a KB I would HIGHLY recommend installing the air inlet temp sensor AFTER the blower. Otherwise you will not have an accurate reading of the air temp being fed by the blower. If the sensor says you are putting 75* air and actually ramming 200* air in you signifigantly increase your chance of detonation. A good tuner should really be monitoring that especially on a blower.

- Matt
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 29, 2007
#10
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #10
:OT: I am not sure I get it with these blown combo's ..why cant he get more than 330rwhp when you here about some many combos at 400-600rwhp?? Cant he just up his boost then?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Apr 29, 2007
#11
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #11
Pokageek said:
:OT: I am not sure I get it with these blown combo's ..why cant he get more than 330rwhp when you here about some many combos at 400-600rwhp?? Cant he just up his boost then?
Click to expand...

the kb is a lower rpm torque monster. the 1.5 tends to not be able to push enough air in the higher rpms to push the hp up in the higher rpm range.

just look at that torque curve ... high and flat

high hp with blowers is always attained at rpms 5000+, not the typical "on the street" rpm range.
 

94gsl5.0

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
223
0
0
seatown
Apr 29, 2007
#12
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #12
Pokageek said:
Let's use the formula that says


horsepower (HP) = lb/hr (fuel) / BSFC
If we assume BSFC of .5, then HP = 2 * lb/hr. Then, if we round the weight of a pound of fuel to 6 pounds HP = 12 * gal/hr. So, if we assume .5 BSFC, then you can actually multiply the numbers in the flow charts by 12 to compute supported horsepower.

Correct me if I am wrong but 255 puts out 58 gallons per hour at 40psi = 58*12= 696 HP. ?
Click to expand...


Pokageek,

When dealing with a forced induction motor, BSFC needs to be calculated at .55 or even .60. Forced induction puts much more demand on a fuel system than a NA setup. Even if they are making comparable HP.

Not bustin your balls, just FYI on the BSFC...
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 29, 2007
#13
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #13
94gsl5.0 said:
Pokageek,

When dealing with a forced induction motor, BSFC needs to be calculated at .55 or even .60. Forced induction puts much more demand on a fuel system than a NA setup. Even if they are making comparable HP.

Not bustin your balls, just FYI on the BSFC...
Click to expand...

No Problemo man. Thanks for the info and thanks for contributing! I was looking for someone to add to our knowledge here Also, I think his 255 should still be enough even though not as much as n/a.

BV I did not know that about forced. Wow there are a lot of factors to take into consideration with forced which makes sense as to why you can really blow up with stock internals if you max too high!
 

DarkProphet

Founding Member
Aug 19, 2002
391
0
0
Quakertown, PA
Apr 30, 2007
#14
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #14
pwcracer said:
Today was the first day I had my car tuned on the dyno. What I found out, is my 255 lph pump is not keeping up with the fuel demands at full boost/rpm.. He thought it might be the filter, so he kept it a bit conservative on the dyno. He said once i fix the fuel issue, he thinks it will do 340-350..

Has anyone had problems with the 255 fuel pumps like this, or can you recommend a better solution?
Click to expand...

I had that problem exactly. When I was getting my car tuned, I was running out of fuel at around 4500, and I was around 340hp at that point. I added a Vortech T-rex inline IN ADDITION TO my 255lph pump, and now have no problems even with a smaller pulley! (my car was tuned with a 9# pulley making about 6#, I swapped it out for an 11# pulley so I make more like 8).

It sounds like you have a very good and responsible tuner. I would rather have it a bit rich to compensate for a hot day with the blower pushing really hot air!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1990 Mustang with no-start condition - Fixed and how-to
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
100
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TTSaleen
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
396
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
818
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?