• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

ebay again

  • Thread starter Thread starter kcobra302
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
Z

zwhitr

Founding Member
Aug 26, 2001
847
0
16
Goldsboro, NC
Apr 12, 2004
#21
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #21
LXXVICOBRA said:
Hey Blue...here ya go! Wow...
http://cgi.aol.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=2473677339&category=6236

This looks to be one of those sports group option type cars, but with a standard interior. Who knows about the suspension on this car however, especially with the V6.
Click to expand...


This one has got me
-no fill on the rad hose
-overflow on the wrong side
-engine braces maybe cause of the T-top Iam I wrong

plus its funny 10,000 Org miles no rust in Florida u-huh
 

Blue coyote

Founding Member
Sep 14, 2002
347
0
16
North America's hemp-basket, BC, Canada
Apr 12, 2004
#22
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #22
zwhitr said:
This one has got me
-no fill on the rad hose
-overflow on the wrong side
-engine braces maybe cause of the T-top Iam I wrong
Click to expand...

I've had several II's over the years, V6, V8, auto, 4-speed, 76-78, and I've never had one with the fill on the rad hose...
No idea on the overflow (its been a few years since I looked at a stock V6)
From what I can see, the engine braces are the same as the ones in my T-top. I think all the T-tops started out with them, regardless of engine.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
Apr 13, 2004
#23
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #23
zwhitr said:
This one has got me
-no fill on the rad hose
-overflow on the wrong side
-engine braces maybe cause of the T-top Iam I wrong

plus its funny 10,000 Org miles no rust in Florida u-huh
Click to expand...

seems right to me...2.8L V6 ... cold air intake is on the driver's side, so the overflow is either non-existant or on the passenger side (I don't remember which). The 2.8L also always had the filler on top of the radiator. The braces are in all the T-Top cars.
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
Apr 13, 2004
#24
  • Apr 13, 2004
  • #24
Blue coyote said:
I've had several II's over the years, V6, V8, auto, 4-speed, 76-78, and I've never had one with the fill on the rad hose...
No idea on the overflow (its been a few years since I looked at a stock V6)
From what I can see, the engine braces are the same as the ones in my T-top. I think all the T-tops started out with them, regardless of engine.
Click to expand...

'76 - early '77 V8 should always have no filler on the radiator, and have a filler inline with the upper hose. Not sure if that started with '75 or not, but it did end in mid '77 and only was like that in the V8 cars.
 
J

Johan

Member
Jun 12, 2003
81
0
6
Waldheim, LA
Apr 15, 2004
#25
  • Apr 15, 2004
  • #25
a351Must2 said:
'76 - early '77 V8 should always have no filler on the radiator, and have a filler inline with the upper hose. Not sure if that started with '75 or not, but it did end in mid '77 and only was like that in the V8 cars.
Click to expand...

'75 V8's did have inline filler, same as '76. I didn't know about the early '77 V8's.
 
L

LXXVICOBRA

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
506
1
0
Central NY State
Apr 17, 2004
#26
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #26
It appears the Cobra that I made reference to in an earlier posting in this thread has sold for $4700...with only two serious bidders in contention over 4K.
Since CobraIILover's car went for considerably more (with several bidders still interested in paying upwards of 7K... I must conclude, that his attention to detail and restoration efforts were well compensated for and are recognized by discriminate buyers, despite the fact he may have lost money overall considering the dollars he had into it in NOS parts.
In any case, it would seem that Cobras in above average semi restored or better conditions are at least holding or rising in value somewhat, despite what seems to still be only moderate demand at this time.
As a sidenote about the car sold in this auction, (which Cobraman mentioned was also for sale previously)...interestingly, I couldn't help but to wonder why anyone would have orderd it to be equipted with a deluxe interior and courtesy light group, yet have no clock and a radio option that did not include the speakers in the doors.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Tires
  • 65er
  • Dec 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
367
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
Realmongo
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
Finally having time to prepare the ad for the 2000 GT conv remaining parts my shop has
  • Tods Hot Rods
  • Sep 17, 2024
  • Feedback Area | Testing Zone
Replies
1
Views
211
Feedback Area | Testing Zone Sep 17, 2024
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
408
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?