• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Edelbrock combo for daily driver

  • Thread starter Thread starter DucatiRdr
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2008

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#1
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #1
I am considering a h/c/i for my '88. To date I have only picked the low hanging fruit:

1.72 roller rockers
65mm TB
UD crank and waterpump pulley
Mass air conversion
70mm 94/95 mass air sensor
1 5/8" headers
Flowmasters

I scored a mint Edelbrock Peformer intake from eBay and was looking at the Edelbrock heads but I have no idea which cam to pick. After the h/c/i I have no future engine changes planned and want the car to be able to be a civil daily driver and pass Massachusetts emissions testing. There was a prior thread similar to this but it died early. Any suggestions? I would really like to stomp my buddy's 93 Camaro Z28.
 

Turkey Sammich

I can't fap normal. I cracked a rib, then my ankle
Jul 12, 2006
0
59
154
Jan 8, 2008
#2
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #2
You should have no problems paying emissions as long as you have cats. If you have your stock catted H, keep it even if you buy an o/r h or x. When it's emissions time put her back on, do a tune, oil change, ect and you'll pass with flying colors. If not, let us know, and we'll have one of our tools help ya out.

Those with a simular set up should be able to help you pick a cam to go with your current set up. You should be running just as much as your buddy if not more at that point. You could always throw in some NOS just to be sure you smoke him.

And...
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#3
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #3
Thanks for the reply!

Pics - I do need to post some pics of my original owner 17,000 mile car. It is in mint shape inside and can use some paint TLC on the outside. No dents or parking lot dings but 1988 was before clear coat and the base coat was crappy from day one.
 

JKidd

Member
Aug 21, 2007
164
3
19
Suffield, CT
Jan 8, 2008
#4
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #4
The Edelbrock is one if the best intakes (IMHO) with potential for further power (porting).

The Edelbrock heads are also and excellent quality head with good power gains, but....TFS Twisted Wedges or AFR 165's are also good quality heads and make a bit more power.

The E303 cam is a good cam. There are better and there are worse, but it keeps the car driveable and will pass emissions. Or you could just keep the stock cam in (if you're doing all this other work, though, I'd switch the cam at the same time). Keep the cats on - possibly go with a 2.5 high-flow catted x-pipe with 2.5" cat-back.

The only other item I'd put on that list would be a set of 3.73 gears. With that laundry list, you should have NO problem with that Chevy.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#5
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #5
Is the Edelbrock Performer cam any good?
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 8, 2008
#6
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #6
You should hang with your buddy now.Personally If it were me and I was running those heads, I'd leave the stock cam in it.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Jan 8, 2008
#7
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #7
An E-303 or Crane 2030 would be right up your alley.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#8
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #8
ttop88 said:
You should hang with your buddy now.Personally If it were me and I was running those heads, I'd leave the stock cam in it.
Click to expand...

Stock cam with Edelbrock intake and Performer heads w 1.72rr?
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Jan 8, 2008
#9
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #9
DucatiRdr said:
Stock cam with Edelbrock intake and Performer heads w 1.72rr?
Click to expand...

The stock cam has a good grind on it allready. There are cars running in the 11's with a stock cam.

But if i was doing all the work I would go ahead and change it. I like the TFS1 cam.
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 8, 2008
#10
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #10
DucatiRdr said:
Stock cam with Edelbrock intake and Performer heads w 1.72rr?
Click to expand...

Yup. Be a killer street car. Great torque and mid range. If you want a cam, I personally love the anderson cams. The N-21 is made for 1.7 rockers and would be a good fit with your parts. As for the others listed I would go TFS-1 before A E303.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Jan 8, 2008
#11
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #11
DucatiRdr said:
Stock cam with Edelbrock intake and Performer heads w 1.72rr?
Click to expand...

The stock cam would still work really well with those parts. You'll just be leaving a bit on the table over 3,000 rpm. Car Craft built a 5.0 motor a while back with AFR 165 heads, a performer rpm intake (carbed), and the stock cam, and made close to 400 fwhp if I remember right. I don't think you'd come real close to that number outside of a dyno cell, but it does show you what the factory cam is capable of.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#12
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #12
Let me ask this; what are the downsides of the TFS1?
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Jan 8, 2008
#13
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #13
See sig.

Other than upgrading to the RPM manifold and 1.7rr's a few years back, I've put just over 125,000 miles on my core combo. I've never had a problem passing Ca. smog. I went with the E-cam (back in '98) simply to cut out the guess work but from a performance standpoint I've been happy with it. I lost some low-end grunt with the E-cam but the 4.10 fixed that right quick. With this combo I drove the car daily for roughly 7-years. Aside from the occassional visit from the surge demon, which can be a PITA, I've been satisfied. I like the idea of running a stock cam though. If I ever decide to step-up the power on my '92 (via h/i or blower) I will be sticking with the stock cam.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Jan 8, 2008
#14
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #14
DucatiRdr said:
Let me ask this; what are the downsides of the TFS1?
Click to expand...

You don't have that instant off-idle 'kick' that you have with the stock cam. Car doesn't feel like it's really pulling until about 2,000 RPM.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 8, 2008
#15
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #15
NKau said:
You don't have that instant off-idle 'kick' that you have with the stock cam. Car doesn't feel like it's really pulling until about 2,000 RPM.
Click to expand...

That doesn't sound so bad. Right now I run 255/16 KDWS out back and traction could be better. What about the idle? Will a lumpy idle make daily driving a chore? My car isn't a daily driver but I do drive it when I can in the summer and living in MA means there is the inevitable stop-and-go to contend with.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Jan 8, 2008
#16
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #16
DucatiRdr said:
That doesn't sound so bad. Right now I run 255/16 KDWS out back and traction could be better. What about the idle? Will a lumpy idle make daily driving a chore? My car isn't a daily driver but I do drive it when I can in the summer and living in MA means there is the inevitable stop-and-go to contend with.
Click to expand...

It's hard to say; it varies for everyone. No two modified vehicles seem to act the same. You will notice a difference in idle with a different cam, but the idle speed can be changed to compensate for this. Personally, after doing the h/c/i this last summer, and driving the car a bit, I'm breaking down and sinking $600 into a Tweecer R/T to tune my car with. My car starts/runs like crap when the motor is cold, and it occasionally likes to die on me when rolling to a stop; all things that can be fixed by tuning.

Also, with the combo listed below in my sig, I trapped 103.7 mph in the 1/4 mile the only time I had it to the track this fall. A definite improvement over the 96.5 mph it went before the motor build up, but still about 3-4 mph and a few ponies less than I was expecting........all of which I will be able to retrieve with tuning.

I would think you would be able to avoid some of this by keeping the stock cam, but there aren't any guarantees. Luckily, you can have any of these issues resolved with a good custom chip/dyno tune or by purchasing a tuning device and ironing these things out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Fox My 93 Coupe Daily Driver. Undone !!!
  • darryl paarman
  • Oct 27, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
142
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2020
darryl paarman
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
R
  • Locked
Expired 1989 Mustang Gt/ 48k Miles On Motor/ Road Track
  • Ricky64
  • Feb 14, 2017
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 16, 2017
Robert hamel
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1989 Mustang Gt 333 Turbo In Pa
  • madspeed
  • Mar 28, 2015
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
7
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 16, 2015
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?