• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Edelbrock IAS, Caltracks, Ride Height...oh my! (pics

  • Thread starter Thread starter allcarfan
  • Start date Start date Mar 17, 2004

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
46
North Atlanta
Mar 17, 2004
#1
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #1
Well,

I solved my ride height situation. The top is a before pic, the bottom is an after pic. I had my caltracs too tight. I had to loosen them up a good bit. I also loosened up my shackles and retorwued them with the weight of the suspension. It dropped the car another 1"+.








opinions?
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
47
San Diego, Ca
Mar 17, 2004
#2
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #2
looks a lot better!
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
43
Stockton, Ca
Mar 17, 2004
#3
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #3
How much was it for the traction bars and shocks? Where did you get them from? I need me some I got my diff in today also. woo hoo.


Looks good man
 

foghorn67

I'll save you the time and choke myself
Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
1,532
0
46
48
Orange County, CA
Mar 17, 2004
#4
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #4
me likey.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
46
North Atlanta
Mar 17, 2004
#5
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #5
shocks were $138 shipped from summit.

Cal Tracs were from Calvert Racing. $340 shipped

Get in Touch with FLORD. He might be able to get you a better deal on Caltracs.

Thanks guys...constructive criticism is also welcome. If I feel up to it, im going to try and run the Black Aerochambers and Chrome tailpipes pretty soon. In the last pic you can just barely see my powdercoated crossmember and trans pan that i made.
 

dolfan87

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,242
0
0
Lake Havasu, AZ
www.finheaven.com
Mar 17, 2004
#6
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #6
I would still drop those Cal-tracks down to the bottom notch at the forward mount.

Other than that, looks great!!
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
53
Cecil County, MD
www.dodgestang.com
Mar 17, 2004
#7
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #7
I would still like to see it alittle lower....prob that fiberglass trunk lid and missing interior parts.....if it doesn't get much lower when you have everything in the car I would add a drop block to get it just a little lower..or maybe its a caltrak adjustment....but that's just me.

I think It looks pretty good though

I offer this just for comparison:
25.5 - 26 inches to fender lips in the rear with Mustang plus mid eye 5 leafs and shelby underriders instead of cal traks...620s in the fronts and shelby a arm mod.
http://www.dodgestang.com/images/hires4.jpg

I don't know if its just the weight difference giving you the extra lift or the cal traks.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
46
North Atlanta
Mar 17, 2004
#8
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #8
dodgestang said:
I would still like to see it alittle lower....prob that fiberglass trunk lid and missing interior parts.....if it doesn't get much lower when you have everything in the car I would add a drop block to get it just a little lower..or maybe its a caltrak adjustment....but that's just me.

I think It looks pretty good though

I offer this just for comparison:
25.5 - 26 inches to fender lips in the rear with Mustang plus mid eye 5 leafs and shelby underriders instead of cal traks...620s in the fronts and shelby a arm mod.
http://www.dodgestang.com/images/hires4.jpg

I don't know if its just the weight difference giving you the extra lift or the cal traks.
Click to expand...

I think its the added weight of the fast back compared to my coupe with a fiberglass decklid. That lid and end caps drops nearly 40 pounds off the rear. Im sure it will settle with a full tank of gas, exhaust, interior weight, and a 'finished' trunk area. its about 26.75 from fender lip to ground now. Tires are about 25.2" tall
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
53
Cecil County, MD
www.dodgestang.com
Mar 17, 2004
#9
  • Mar 17, 2004
  • #9
allcarfan said:
I think its the added weight of the fast back compared to my coupe with a fiberglass decklid. That lid and end caps drops nearly 40 pounds off the rear. Im sure it will settle with a full tank of gas, exhaust, interior weight, and a 'finished' trunk area. its about 26.75 from fender lip to ground now. Tires are about 25.2" tall
Click to expand...

My tires are 25.5 (255 40 17)

Hehe...I see 1/2 inch blocks in your future.

Looks great. Once everything is in the car you will sit just fine...that 1/2 leaf difference should settle in nice to 26 inch high. I also agree that you should pop that caltrak into the lower hole....that angle just looks wrong on the bar...but I am not an expert by any stretch.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
46
San Diego
Mar 18, 2004
#10
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #10
NO CHROME TIPS !!!!!!! Please man,that's so tacky man.Well, it's just bad when you can see where the tips was welded on. And then when it rusts. The best exhaust ever is on the fox-body LX. Shiny but you can't it.See what I mean. You just don't to see the start.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
53
Cecil County, MD
www.dodgestang.com
Mar 18, 2004
#11
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #11
10secgoal said:
NO CHROME TIPS !!!!!!! Please man,that's so tacky man.Well, it's just bad when you can see where the tips was welded on. And then when it rusts. The best exhaust ever is on the fox-body LX. Shiny but you can't it.See what I mean. You just don't to see the start.
Click to expand...

You gots a problem with chrome tips?

 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
46
San Diego
Mar 18, 2004
#12
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #12
Nope those are awesome. But you can't see where it starts. Know what I mean ? When you god forbid you see a ranger with a 6 in. tip welded on the end of the exhaust, and it's only 4 in long.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
46
North Atlanta
Mar 19, 2004
#13
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #13
10secgoal....

From the back of my muffler to the very last tip of my tailpipe is a highly polished HTS coating...looks identical to Chrome. Thats what I was referrinf to. Of course, I am going to add a chrome tip to 'finish' it off...that or have my tailpipes angle cut on the ends.
 

BAD67FUN

Founding Member
Oct 31, 2001
589
0
0
Wisconsin
Mar 19, 2004
#14
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #14
Lower...
 
V

vobraman

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
144
0
0
Mar 19, 2004
#15
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #15
Looks Good to me !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Height of wheel well opening over the tires, front and rear, and adding clearance for 17x9 wheels up front
  • Blue Thunder
  • May 21, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 21, 2024
LILCBRA
Suspension Foxbody ride height change after installing new control arms
  • Mhalc1
  • Jan 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 10, 2024
Mhalc1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?