• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Edelbrock performer VS. Gt 40

  • Thread starter Thread starter RsStanG1987
  • Start date Start date Oct 5, 2004

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Oct 5, 2004
#1
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #1
Which is better and which will give me more bang for my buck.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Oct 5, 2004
#2
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #2
The Performer intake is a better all around intake. The GT40 and Cobra have similar average flow numbers, but the Performer has more consitant flow across all runners, whereas the Cobra/GT40 has fairly uneven flow across all runners. You can pick up a used Performer for around $300 without much effort.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Oct 5, 2004
#3
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #3
As far as money goes, I think the Edelbrock is a little cheaper and does have better numbers. I am partial to the Gt40 though. I have seen people make a lot of power using them. I have one on my car and love it. You have to be careful though. Edelbrock makes a couple intakes. Make sure you get the one that is right for your combo.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Oct 5, 2004
#4
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #4
for your set up right now, the performer might be the best option. it will also be much cheaper for a used one. I dont know why, but the GT40 intakes are hard to find and hold their valve...not sure why though. I think that the gt40 is like the cobra...just fancier
 

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Oct 5, 2004
#5
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #5
wait for the BBK SSI
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 5, 2004
#6
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #6
I don't see a head change in your sig, so either intake will work well and most likely will be insignificant power difference. Buy a Cobra or Explorer as they are much cheaper!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 5, 2004
#7
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #7
Go with a Performer intake and it will later compliment your car if you add heads and cam later...the Performer is more bang for the buck...

Good Luck
 

dstanggt50

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2000
1,316
0
0
Woodinville, WA
Oct 5, 2004
#8
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #8
I've only seen a couple, but I think if money is your main concern, then probably the performer, I think they provide similar results. I am also partial, I have the gt-40, I performed the swap w/stock heads, could really feel a difference, didn't have any before dyno numbers, but ran 245rwhp, 292 rwtq, w/the intake,maf,headers,off road, catback.
 

jb89coupe

New Member
Sep 3, 2004
416
0
0
CT
Oct 5, 2004
#9
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #9
Nothing scientific for you, but I have a friend with virtually the same setup as me w/ a GT40 (I have the Performer) and I always end up in front of him by a carlength or so. Obviously there are tons of variables, but when I drive his car it seems less responsive in the low end and about the same up top as mine. And for what it's worth - I installed my intake by itself (well, along with 180* thermo) and noticed a pretty big difference afterward. I had an accufab 70mm tb on a port-matched stock intake before that. I'm sure it won't give you the 37hp Edelbrock claims (hah) but it's definately noticeable even with stock heads.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 5, 2004
#10
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #10
Everybody is biased to what they bought. Results depend onm a lot more than just the intake. Here is a sampling of results with all types of intakes............
 

houstonstangguy

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2002
979
0
0
Houston, Texas
Oct 5, 2004
#11
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #11
the performer intake would be my choice but both are good intakes.

why not do the headers, h-pipe and then add some 1.7 roller rockers (easy to find used on the classified forums). it would cost you about the same price as the intake, benefit you more now, and most of that you can do yourself
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 5, 2004
#12
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #12
The Performer is the better intake overall. More expandability, flows better, even flow. The GT-40 is still a good intake, see what you can get them for and go for the better price.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Oct 5, 2004
#13
  • Oct 5, 2004
  • #13
why not do the headers said:
Well i Have a set of headers waiting to go on im just waiting to decide if i wanna go off road h or x im not sure on that yet i figure i would rather do everything all at once over a weekend then a little at a time. And would roller rockers really help me on stock heads?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Edelbrock 1406 install help
  • scottcarp10
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
260
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 15, 2025
scottcarp10
S
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
398
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine Felpro 9333 pt1 (with 8psi boost)
  • JD1964
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
736
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Mach 1 iac valve in a 4.6 gt
  • solodriverz
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
70
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 5, 2026
squeak93
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?