• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Edelbrock torker intakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1973mach1
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2004
1

1973mach1

Member
May 19, 2003
457
0
16
PA
Jan 15, 2004
#1
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #1
Has anyone used the Edelbrock Torker intake? I been thinking about using one if I go to the 351c 4bbl, are they any good for a street car, good HP and torque over stock or should I go to a blue thunder instead?

Thanks,
Jim
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Jan 15, 2004
#2
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #2
The Torquer makes EXCELENT hp, but they tend to like the rpms.... so unless youre running like 3.9+ gears (4.30s would love a torquer)...

You'll probably have MUCH better "real world" performance out of the Blue Thunder, but hang on to youre wallett.. their about 300 bucks.
For a street driven car, I would reccomend the BT.
(just FYI they dont make a torquer2 for the 351C, so if you get the "well I had one on my windsor and....", just be aware the original was a 3-7000 intake)

Hope this helps
Dave-
 

Jonstantine

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
487
0
0
Oklahoma
Jan 15, 2004
#3
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #3
i like my torker intake
its on a 289... but the only other intake ive had is the performer
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jan 16, 2004
#4
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #4
Ive got a original torker and love it, im thinking of buying a new torker2
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jan 16, 2004
#5
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #5
mustangman70 said:
Ive got a original torker and love it, im thinking of buying a new torker2
Click to expand...

beware..... old torker's are much better than the new one's!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 16, 2004
#6
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #6
Gawd, I didn't think anybody liked Torkers, go ask this question on the 351C Forum on network54 and you'll get a better idea of how good a Torker is.
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Jan 16, 2004
#7
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #7
i was running one on my c and was pretty happy with it but never had anything else to compare it with so good luck however u go
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Jan 16, 2004
#8
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #8
1973mach1 said:
Has anyone used the Edelbrock Torker intake? I been thinking about using one if I go to the 351c 4bbl, are they any good for a street car, good HP and torque over stock or should I go to a blue thunder instead?

Thanks,
Jim
Click to expand...

I have a torker 2 on my 289. I also have a lot of hp, a 3.70 rear gear and a 4 speed. Without at least a gear or manual tranny to keep your rpm's up, a dual plane would be better. Single planes like the torker are better above 2500 rpm's.
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Jan 17, 2004
#9
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #9
The Torker for the Cleveland and the 302w are completely different and not really comparable in the way that they peform due to the fact that the Cleveland and Windsors are very different engines.

First off they don't make a Torker for 351c 2v's, per say. You can bolt it on but that manifold is intended for a 4V head. On a 2v head there will be significant mismatch of the ports and I wouldn't do it unless I matched the ports as much as is possible. Furthermore, the Torker is an O.K. manifold for a 4v head, but there are many better manifolds for the 4v heads depending on what RPM you intend to use the engine.

If you keep the 2v heads use the Weiand intake manifold. If you get 4v heads and want a fantastic all-around intake get the Blue Thunder, it is very comparable to the Edelbrock RPM manifold on a 302w. If you want to spin your Cleveland 4v and make great higher end power get a Holley Strip Dominator or a Parker FunnelWeb.

Many of us have been fooling with, building, driving and researching Clevelands for a long time. Trust us, we have the info and experience, so don't go down the path of self discovery with this engine on your own, with all of the pit falls and mistake$ waiting for you. If you need more confirmation then go to the network54 cleveland forum.

The 351 Cleveland 4v motor is a very powerful motor with the stock heads, maybe the most powerful mass-produced smallblock ever. The formula to make the 4v Cleveland perform extremely well is simple, with relatively few variations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Old Holley head identification???
  • Ar15cobra
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
161
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
220
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
396
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
782
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
767
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?