• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

EFI to carb or keep EFI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter odsysean
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
O

odsysean

Member
Dec 12, 2011
40
0
6
Pa
Feb 18, 2013
#1
  • Feb 18, 2013
  • #1
I just bought an 88 coupe and i plan on making it a track car...
Before anyone bashes, I want to explain that the EFI setup has been removed from the previous owner (Harness, ECU, upper and lower intakes and distributor)
Since I want to make this a track car, I will be overhauling/ rebuilding this engine. I want to keep it a 302 or possibly bore it to a 306. I also plan on taking it to mustang week this year so I do want some drive ability behind it as well. I plan on getting at least 300-350 to the wheels. There may be other threads on this as well im sure but I will not search for something I don't want, so lose the frustration. But my main point is im on a budget somewhat over the next few months and im curious if I should buy a new EFI setup (don't tell me to buy a used harness) as in new intakes, new harness, new ECU, new MAF etc. or go the easy route and switch to carb. If I switch to carb, what exactly CAN I use that I still have? I would plan on running an electric in-line fuel pump so I can keep the same timing cover, I'd need the duraspark distributor, probably a 600cfm holley, maybe a 650, performer intake, all the stuff to convert to carb, since it'd be cheaper. But what heads and cam should i use that would be carb friendly? i was thinking afr 165 at the most, but most likely TW heads and a stage 2 TF cam, with upgraded rockers, springs, pushrods and lifters. I know how to tune carbs and rebuild them, so i'm not a beginner with them. Also, since I want this to be somewhat reliable so I don't have to keep rebuilding, should I spend the extra money for the forged pistons or for 300-350 horse would the oem be fine? I'm not too sure how these 302's hold up and if I do have to keep EFI it will cost more. I'm just looking for a budget build that will be reliable and easy. Please give me your inputs, thanks. AND NO YELLING!!!!
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 19, 2013
#2
  • Feb 19, 2013
  • #2
For a track only car that will not be street driven, either one will do. Just be aware of the fact that the car will not pass emissions and cannot be titled or street driven in some states. If you state isn't one of those, do what you want.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Feb 19, 2013
#3
  • Feb 19, 2013
  • #3
Here's what I'm running in my car it's about 330 rwhp Im using a wolverine camshaft, Holley 650 hp series, weiand stealth intake, gt40x heads,and full MSD ignition. I drive mine daily when it's not snowing and I'm not working. It's very streetable but its a pig on gas. I also run a mechanical fuel pump. Since your car was previously efi I'd stay efi. You'll endup spending more in carb parts than you would making it stock efi again.
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Feb 19, 2013
#4
  • Feb 19, 2013
  • #4
I agree with RsStang, its not hard to get the efi going again and all those parts can be had for cheap. My vote is for Efi
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 20, 2013
#5
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #5
If it is street driven at all, as in has a license plate, my vote is EFI.
If it is track only, then carb.

EFI is not really any more expensive.
Prices on carb stuff is ever increasing, while EFI stuff is more and more affordable all the time due to market saturation.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Feb 25, 2013
#6
  • Feb 25, 2013
  • #6
YELLING!, lol sorry.
Now that i got that out of my system. The 88' 302 bottom end has forged pistons from the factory and that bottom end will easily support the power you are looking for. TW 170cc heads and a stage 2 cam are a good start, if your budget minded procomp or professional products makes a decent intake for the money just needs to be cleaned up with a dremel a bit. Look to proform for a carburetor they are made by quick fuel for proform and are really nice for the money. Hope this helps
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Feb 26, 2013
#7
  • Feb 26, 2013
  • #7
i recently picked up a fresh duraspark for $40 off ebay. ford reman. i got an old 302 vic jr for $100. if i were doing a budget 302/306 i would do a set of RHS 180s at 58cc, an anderson N41 cam advanced 4*, a vic jr, duraspark and an AED 650 HO. i am convinced that even the holley HPs are garbage. if you go carbureted, buy a real carb and be done with it.
 
S

squekster

Member
Jan 5, 2011
55
2
9
long island
Mar 13, 2013
#8
  • Mar 13, 2013
  • #8
odsysean said:
I just bought an 88 coupe and i plan on making it a track car...
Before anyone bashes, I want to explain that the EFI setup has been removed from the previous owner (Harness, ECU, upper and lower intakes and distributor)
Since I want to make this a track car, I will be overhauling/ rebuilding this engine. I want to keep it a 302 or possibly bore it to a 306. I also plan on taking it to mustang week this year so I do want some drive ability behind it as well. I plan on getting at least 300-350 to the wheels. There may be other threads on this as well im sure but I will not search for something I don't want, so lose the frustration. But my main point is im on a budget somewhat over the next few months and im curious if I should buy a new EFI setup (don't tell me to buy a used harness) as in new intakes, new harness, new ECU, new MAF etc. or go the easy route and switch to carb. If I switch to carb, what exactly CAN I use that I still have? I would plan on running an electric in-line fuel pump so I can keep the same timing cover, I'd need the duraspark distributor, probably a 600cfm holley, maybe a 650, performer intake, all the stuff to convert to carb, since it'd be cheaper. But what heads and cam should i use that would be carb friendly? i was thinking afr 165 at the most, but most likely TW heads and a stage 2 TF cam, with upgraded rockers, springs, pushrods and lifters. I know how to tune carbs and rebuild them, so i'm not a beginner with them. Also, since I want this to be somewhat reliable so I don't have to keep rebuilding, should I spend the extra money for the forged pistons or for 300-350 horse would the oem be fine? I'm not too sure how these 302's hold up and if I do have to keep EFI it will cost more. I'm just looking for a budget build that will be reliable and easy. Please give me your inputs, thanks. AND NO YELLING!!!!
Click to expand...
Just remember there were carbs before efi. Carbs have come a long way .A carb setup can pass emissions.I have had nothing but trouble with
fuel injection. I am considering swaping out that efi pain in the ass. If its not surging its not idling right. Computer controlled cars drive me nuts. To much can go wrong.
Put a good cam in it and the computer tries to smooth out the idle.Carb set up is much cheaper and has been proven not to decrease hp by much if at all.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 13, 2013
#9
  • Mar 13, 2013
  • #9
If you go the carb route it may be a little cheaper at first but will require more tuning- carb, distributor, etc. as well as maintenance. IMO it is easier to get to your HP goal with any number of proven EFI setups that will be more reliable on the track. You won't have to change out jets or advance springs, etc. depending on track conditions. The computer/laptop setup for your EFI will allow you to easily adjust fuel and timing curves and a number of other variables as well as give you playback capabilities that a non computer carb setup. I remember back when the Mustang first went to EFI in 86? we all ripped off the EFI and put carbs on because of the "limitations" of the EFI. That was 27 years ago and I can't think of why you'd want to run a carb if the $$$ are anywhere close to an EFI setup.

Just my 2 cents
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 13, 2013
#10
  • Mar 13, 2013
  • #10
RsStanG1987 said:
Here's what I'm running in my car it's about 330 rwhp Im using a wolverine camshaft, Holley 650 hp series, weiand stealth intake, gt40x heads,and full MSD ignition. I drive mine daily when it's not snowing and I'm not working. It's very streetable but its a pig on gas. I also run a mechanical fuel pump. Since your car was previously efi I'd stay efi. You'll endup spending more in carb parts than you would making it stock efi again.
Click to expand...
You're making 330rwhp with just that? Ok....where's the stroker kit you're not telling us about?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 13, 2013
#11
  • Mar 13, 2013
  • #11
squekster said:
Just remember there were carbs before efi. Carbs have come a long way .A carb setup can pass emissions.I have had nothing but trouble with
fuel injection. I am considering swaping out that efi pain in the ass. If its not surging its not idling right. Computer controlled cars drive me nuts. To much can go wrong.
Put a good cam in it and the computer tries to smooth out the idle.Carb set up is much cheaper and has been proven not to decrease hp by much if at all.
Click to expand...
Carb is not cheaper.
Have you priced carbs and intakes lately?
Not to mention all the other misc stuff you'd need for a conversion.
You could save money on a used intake, but used carbs generally suck.
If you drive the car more than twice a year, you have to worry about fuel costs too.
You'll lose significant MPG going to a carb.

A carb set up won't pass emissions on the visual.
I doubt it would pass the sniffer, and if it did, it would be a carb that would be worthless for performance.

Carbs make more power than EFI, not less.... proven.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 14, 2013
#12
  • Mar 14, 2013
  • #12
when i was in HS i had a 65 coupe with a 289 with a 650 holley double pumper, c4 and some 3.0 gears. it averaged 17 mpg when i drove it easy around town. most of my buddies who had stock new fox 5 liters at the time got similar mileage in town but got better on the hwy because they had overdrive.
 
S

squekster

Member
Jan 5, 2011
55
2
9
long island
Mar 14, 2013
#13
  • Mar 14, 2013
  • #13
ratio411 said:
Carb is not cheaper.
Have you priced carbs and intakes lately?
Not to mention all the other misc stuff you'd need for a conversion.
You could save money on a used intake, but used carbs generally suck.
If you drive the car more than twice a year, you have to worry about fuel costs too.
You'll lose significant MPG going to a carb.

A carb set up won't pass emissions on the visual.
I doubt it would pass the sniffer, and if it did, it would be a carb that would be worthless for performance.

Carbs make more power than EFI, not less.... proven.
Click to expand...
Summit racing sells a
good carb for about $300 they also sell a good dual plane for around $180 .My trickflow intake cost me $ 450, injectors cost me $260 Throttle body and spacer another $250 maf another buck and change. fuel pump another $130. You can change jets to pass emisions go home and change them back. Besides you are at the mercy of the computer's program. in an injected engine. You can tweek a carb any way you want. Granted mpg might suffer a little, but when you build an engine for power that is to be expected.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 14, 2013
#14
  • Mar 14, 2013
  • #14
squekster said:
Summit racing sells a
good carb for about $300 they also sell a good dual plane for around $180 .My trickflow intake cost me $ 450, injectors cost me $260 Throttle body and spacer another $250 maf another buck and change. fuel pump another $130.
Click to expand...
You throw out the cheapest parts when it comes to carbs, and high end parts when it comes to EFI.
You know as well as I do that carbs have gone through the roof while the EFI market is saturated with parts less expensive as the ones you quote. My point was that you won't get away with a carb conversion done right for less money that keeping, or even upgrading EFI.

The emissions thing is a no brainer. If your car came with EFI, they won't pass you with a carb on the engine. Just like I said in the last post... you won't pass visual.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 14, 2013
#15
  • Mar 14, 2013
  • #15
clement said:
when i was in HS i had a 65 coupe with a 289 with a 650 holley double pumper, c4 and some 3.0 gears. it averaged 17 mpg when i drove it easy around town. most of my buddies who had stock new fox 5 liters at the time got similar mileage in town but got better on the hwy because they had overdrive.
Click to expand...

I have never run a double pumper and got better than 5 mpg!
But then I have never run a DP and been able to "drive it easy"...
What is the point of that?
You might as well run a 1bbl carb if you are going to "drive it easy"... or better yet.... EFI!





...
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 14, 2013
#16
  • Mar 14, 2013
  • #16
Unless you have a quadrajet or some other 4bbl with smaller primaries. no way are you going to get the same MPG as with EFI. Def not a holley 650DP.
 
S

squekster

Member
Jan 5, 2011
55
2
9
long island
Mar 15, 2013
#17
  • Mar 15, 2013
  • #17
ratio411 said:
You throw out the cheapest parts when it comes to carbs, and high end parts when it comes to EFI.
You know as well as I do that carbs have gone through the roof while the EFI market is saturated with parts less expensive as the ones you quote. My point was that you won't get away with a carb conversion done right for less money that keeping, or even upgrading EFI.

The emissions thing is a no brainer. If your car came with EFI, they won't pass you with a carb on the engine. Just like I said in the last post... you won't pass visual.
Click to expand...
I guess you can't argue with progress. Back in 72 when emissions control started to rear it's ugly head I thought that the hot rod was
slowly dying , obviously I was wrong. The great thing about this country and the people in it is even with
the government putting limits on auto emissions. We found a way around it.
 
Reactions: ratio411

Illuminator

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
219
10
29
So. Cal
Mar 15, 2013
#18
  • Mar 15, 2013
  • #18
I recall running a 65odp on a 69 351w w/massaged single plane and heads, and 750dp on 351c 4v titanium valve massaged heads w/huge custom isky solid roller dialed for a blower. Also ran 11.5:1 comp Torker setup. The Cleveland was a beast!! Broke every drivetrain part end to end even pulling motor thru hood and shattering 5-leaf leaf springs in pcs., twisting rear wheels into wells etc....sure the 4.56's and stickies had something to do with that. Yes carb's take infinite tweaking to dial in to certain mods, but most run decent out of the box depending on what you buy.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 15, 2013
#19
  • Mar 15, 2013
  • #19
squekster said:
Summit racing sells a
good carb for about $300 they also sell a good dual plane for around $180 .My trickflow intake cost me $ 450, injectors cost me $260 Throttle body and spacer another $250 maf another buck and change. fuel pump another $130. You can change jets to pass emisions go home and change them back. Besides you are at the mercy of the computer's program. in an injected engine. You can tweek a carb any way you want. Granted mpg might suffer a little, but when you build an engine for power that is to be expected.
Click to expand...
Please post details on what carb and intake combo you're getting for that price.
 
S

squekster

Member
Jan 5, 2011
55
2
9
long island
Mar 15, 2013
#20
  • Mar 15, 2013
  • #20
Gearbanger 101 said:
Please post details on what carb and intake combo you're getting for that price.
Click to expand...
It is listed in the current
summit racing catalogue. I don't have one handy right now but I will post details
tomorrow.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
748
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
183
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
725
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
675
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?