• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Eibach Pro-kit question

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangg01
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Jinx

I like cats, cats like me. Cats and I fully agree.
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 2, 2003
12,166
4,237
223
Cat Country
Dec 24, 2006
#61
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #61
stangg01 said:
After a week or so My car is now 1.2" lower in front and 1" lower in back with full gas tank. Interestingly a full tank will lower the rear 1/2".

The problem with the rear not being same hight was the isolators. I re-used them. One side was in original spot on lower isolator. While the other was not. This caused the difference in hight between sides. I corrected the problem. Now both sides are the same hight.

Thank for the advice everyone.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the conclusion/update to your problem with uneven ride height in the back with Eibach Pros. I am in the same situation (drivers side sits 3/8 lower than passenger side) and I will have to find time to put it up on stands and probably replace the isolators or adjust them.


.
.
.
 
S

stangg01

New Member
Mar 17, 2006
129
0
0
Dec 24, 2006
#62
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #62
Jinx102672,

I just checked my rear axle placement with a plumb bob. It sits 1/2 inches toward the right. I believe this would account for the car wanting to sit lower on the drivers side.

When I played with the isolators, I could see an indentation in them where the spring use to sit. I took advantage of this when re-situating the springs. If I used new isolators, I think that the drivers side would have sat lower than the passenger side.

From this forum, I believe that a panhard bar would be necessary to center the axle. This should result in a level rear end.
 

Jinx

I like cats, cats like me. Cats and I fully agree.
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 2, 2003
12,166
4,237
223
Cat Country
Dec 25, 2006
#63
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #63
stangg01 said:
Jinx102672,

I just checked my rear axle placement with a plumb bob. It sits 1/2 inches toward the right. I believe this would account for the car wanting to sit lower on the drivers side.

When I played with the isolators, I could see an indentation in them where the spring use to sit. I took advantage of this when re-situating the springs. If I used new isolators, I think that the drivers side would have sat lower than the passenger side.

From this forum, I believe that a panhard bar would be necessary to center the axle. This should result in a level rear end.
Click to expand...

Cool, good info Merry Christmas
 
W

Wolfman1

Founding Member
Apr 17, 2001
81
0
0
Peoria IL
Dec 26, 2006
#64
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #64
For the life of me, I cannot understand why all you fight this very simple install.
All that is needed is to disconnect the lower ball joint from the strut, and lower the lower control arm,(after you loosen the control arm mount bolts at the "K" member) no removing brake calipers,lines,sensors etc. the spring falls out. The new spring(for the front ) is the short one not the tall one. As allways new springs will take up to 4-5 days to "settle" do not pannic if your drop is not what you expected at first. Most people do not tell you this, mostly because they do not know. By the way the install of the new spring is very easy due to the fact it is quite shorter than the orig. The fronts are easier than the rear, (no sway bar)
To clear up any misunderstanding, yes their is a jack under the spring perch of the contol arm (with the handle pointing, or under the opsite ball joint to allow for the swing of the arm.
This brings up the question of when to tighten the lower control arm mount bolts ? not until the weight of the car is on the tires. same goes for the rear control arms. I have done this for over forty years, works every time!
John Stommel
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
334
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
J
Severe shaking/vibrations in steering wheel
  • jacket999
  • May 20, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
845
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2025
NtheGAME
N
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
955
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
613
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?