• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Elevation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evil281
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2008

evil281

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
276
0
0
Arizona
Aug 10, 2008
#1
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #1
how much does elevation effect you 1/4 mile time??

Where i race its 3000 above sea level and it was about 95 degrees out this friday when i raced also was humid too cause a storm had passed by not sure how much humidity, anyway want to know how much elevation can effect my time
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Aug 10, 2008
#2
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #2
The question is how much does altitude effect your HP output. Based On 3000 feet 95 degrees 85% Humidity I would say you are losing about 22% of your HP compared to 0 feet 60 degrees and 0% humidity
 

evil281

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
276
0
0
Arizona
Aug 10, 2008
#3
  • Aug 10, 2008
  • #3
Stan Weiss said:
The question is how much does altitude effect your HP output. Based On 3000 feet 95 degrees 85% Humidity I would say you are losing about 22% of your HP compared to 0 feet 60 degrees and 0% humidity
Click to expand...



wow thats nice to know for sure, now i dont feel that bad about running a 14.2sec 1/4 mile
 

blacksheep-1

Member
Oct 21, 2006
322
4
18
Aug 12, 2008
#4
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #4
this guy is a bit of a whacko, but his HP calculators are pretty useful

Engine Tuning Calculator - dew point
 

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Aug 12, 2008
#5
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #5
Evil281....up here in Denver, my car as well as my buddies (within 5 of your hp/tq numbers) run anywhere between 14.8-15.2 depending on if its a good run or not. I'd take 14.2 any day!
 

evil281

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
276
0
0
Arizona
Aug 12, 2008
#6
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #6
ScortLX said:
Evil281....up here in Denver, my car as well as my buddies (within 5 of your hp/tq numbers) run anywhere between 14.8-15.2 depending on if its a good run or not. I'd take 14.2 any day!
Click to expand...


sweet i thought i was sucking it up cause i see all these people get in 13's with same power or sometimes less than mine, thought i was an idiot
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 13, 2008
#7
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #7
by being higher in elevation there is less oxygen in the air and will make less hp causing the slower times.
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Aug 13, 2008
#8
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #8
I know at the track in Denver (around 5k above sea level, and some really nasty DAs sometimes above 10k) an N/A car will run about 1 second slower.

My corrected Dyno numbers N/A were 265/310 or something, uncorrected it was 210/260 or something similar.

Supercharged cars you lose about 2lbs of boost between CO and sea level. So it's harder to gauge as the dyno doesn't SAE correct for boost. I was getting 6lbs and 360/360 corrected, here in England now I'm getting almost 9lbs and I'd guess I'm a lot closer to if not over 400 at the wheels.

Turbo cars still suffer, but not as bad. I think it's around 5 10ths or so for cars over 400 rwhp the smaller turbos maybe a full second.

I'll have track times this weekend if it doesn't rain so I'll know what the car is running in the 1/4 at 100 feet above sea level vs 5k+
 

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Aug 13, 2008
#9
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #9
Hows England Greg? Let us know how the beast does!

Nate
 

evil281

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
276
0
0
Arizona
Aug 13, 2008
#10
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #10
let us know what you run
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1999 Mustang GT - No Start- Need help understanding the fuel pump circuit and how it works
  • 99gtGuy
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
564
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
04newedge-
0
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
826
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Friday at 3:18 PM
2000xp8
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
433
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
132
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?