• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

engine build ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buckhunter125@h
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Oct 26, 2008
#1
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #1
what order should you choose your components ? ........ 347 stroker ............ heads,cam , intake , ......... do you choose heads first ,then match the cam and intake to the heads ............ or choose a cam ,and match the heads and intake to it ?





in other words ............ the chicken or the egg ............ which comes first ????
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
Oct 27, 2008
#2
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #2
IMO
1) cam + intake + carb + gearing depends on how aggressive you want to be
2) compression ratio
3) heads (if still demanded)

it is very cost effective to do 1) and 2) at the same time if you want an aggressive cam
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 27, 2008
#3
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #3
First you should define the desired goals of the motor build and use that as a guideline.

IMHO, heads are the most important part of the equation and should be chosen first--you really can't get too good of a head. Of course compression comes into play and you must have a suitable piston to reach your target ratio. Next I would choose the cam (or yet better have one custom ground for your application), based upon the desired compression, tranny, rear gear and your defined goals. I would save the intake for last and of course that is generally dictated by the expected rpm and use of the motor.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 27, 2008
#4
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #4
Choose your heads first, stock heads just really don't go with a 347, unless you're just after killer bottom end stump pulling. And as Dennis stated, choose the pistons to match the heads in compression ratio.(what octane fuel do you want to feed it?) Next comes the cam and intake, there's lots of room to play with here, it all depends on what you want out of it. Do you want high end HP, or something that's easy to live with on the street(mileage and driveability)? Cam choice also has a lot to do with the octane requirement too, so keep that in mind.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 27, 2008
#5
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #5
i agree with dennis and DH, first decide what you want from this engine, decide what rpm range you are going to run this engine in 80% of the time. then select the heads that will feed the engine properly in that rpm range. after that select the intake, headers, and cam.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 27, 2008
#6
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #6
dennis112 said:
First you should define the desired goals of the motor build and use that as a guideline.
Click to expand...
Yepper
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Oct 27, 2008
#7
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #7
Gears in the rear should be considered also, as they will be dictated by the camshaft.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 27, 2008
#8
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #8
Buckhunter125@h said:
what order should you choose your components ? ........ 347 stroker ............ heads,cam , intake , ......... do you choose heads first ,then match the cam and intake to the heads ............ or choose a cam ,and match the heads and intake to it ?
Click to expand...

I agree with everyone that said to determine what goals you have for the engine and how you want to reach them. Since you already have the crank, rods, and pistons, I would first be looking at the heads, followed by the induction and exhaust, and lastly a cam that matches the combination.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Oct 27, 2008
#9
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #9
400-425 HP ........... as much torque as possible .............. good manners for steet driving ........... but with a mean sounding idle !!!! ...................... 6000-6500 RPM max ............ 3.80 rear
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 28, 2008
#10
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #10
Buckhunter125@h said:
400-425 HP ........... as much torque as possible .............. good manners for steet driving ........... but with a mean sounding idle !!!! ...................... 6000-6500 RPM max ............ 3.80 rear
Click to expand...

that is doable with a 347. probably the best head to use will have a 184 to 200 cc intake runner, and 2.02in/1.60ex valves. a header with a 1 5/8" primary tube and a 3" collector will handle the exhaust. for the intake side either a performer rpm air gap intake or a weiand stealth intake and a 750cfm carb. as for the cam, something along the lines of the comp cams 280h magnum cam, or the xe268h extreme energy cam should do the trick. i wouldnt go any bigger than these cams, or something similar as you start to lose drivability.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Oct 28, 2008
#11
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #11
thanks
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Nov 2, 2008
#12
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #12
347 Roller block
AFR185's
RPM Air-Gap
650 Speed demon
XE274HR - or smaller such as XE276HR
1 5/8" Long Tubes

Solid 425hp, maybe more.

Remeber, advertised rpm range on cams will be lower when used on a stroker, obviously, if money permits, use the above recipe, but go custom cam and you wont regret it.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Nov 2, 2008
#13
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #13
thekid760 said:
347 Roller block
AFR185's
RPM Air-Gap
650 Speed demon
XE274HR - or smaller such as XE276HR
1 5/8" Long Tubes

Solid 425hp, maybe more.

Remeber, advertised rpm range on cams will be lower when used on a stroker, obviously, if money permits, use the above recipe, but go custom cam and you wont regret it.
Click to expand...

Ditto. Although Im not so sure how much power youll find with a custom cam, it still pays to find the right cam for your combo.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 2, 2008
#14
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #14
will stroking my 302 make it a 347 roller block ? I've been out of the game for a long time and am just now re-educating myself.

Heck I'm so old school up until buying my 68 FB last spring I still thought 271HP from a 289 HIPO was impressive !!!!! ................... 8^)
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 2, 2008
#15
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #15
When people talk about a "roller" 5.0, 302, or 351W, they are talking about engines equipped with roller lifters and matching cams, also known simply as a "roller cam."

In short, you have to use a stroker kit to get 347ci and a conversion "kit" to get a roller cam.
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Nov 2, 2008
#16
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #16
Or buy a good used late model (85-95) 302 block. That will allow you to use stock style lifters with dogbones/spyter tray, and the use of normal base circle cams (ealry non-roller blocks had a smaller base circle thus limiting your cam choice.)
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Nov 2, 2008
#17
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #17
Read this, should answer many of your questions:

http://forums.stangnet.com/719569-302-stroker-information.html
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 3, 2008
#18
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #18
does it behave well on the street ??? sounds like what I have been lookin for .
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 5, 2008
#19
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #19
thekid760 said:
(ealry non-roller blocks had a smaller base circle thus limiting your cam choice.)
Click to expand...

No, not neccessarily. Either cam can be used, it depends on what lifters you choose.
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Nov 5, 2008
#20
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #20
Sorry, I was misinformed.

Thanks.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
155
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
641
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
208
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?