• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

engine build

  • Thread starter Thread starter ras50gt
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2010

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Jun 21, 2010
#1
  • Jun 21, 2010
  • #1
Havent been on in awhile and just wanted to get some more advise on which way to go....

I would like to either build a 331 stroker or 351w. Currently my car is mostly stock except for full exhaust. I also have a paxton novi 1220 sitting in my garage in its box never opened. After some thinking I had decided I would go 331, but talking to many people, it seems like the 351 might be the better route for future goals.

Id like to make at least 375-425 hp. Id like to use the paxton I have, so another question is if I can make the novi 1220 work on the 351W?? And if anyone has info on how to do this. Or maybe I should just sell the supercharger.

Ive been looking at 03 cobras and even the new 5.0, but with those I would then have to make monthly payments, etc. Even if I get a cobra, what would you do with the 5.0? should I go 331 or 351w? Again, ive always wanted to supercharge it, so if possible, keep that a part of it.
 

87GT Drop Top

Member
May 1, 2009
500
3
17
South Florida
Jun 22, 2010
#2
  • Jun 22, 2010
  • #2
A N/A 347 can easily make those #'s. Also a 331 with a blower can as well.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 22, 2010
#3
  • Jun 22, 2010
  • #3
You'll spend a little more building and installing the 351W in your car, but you'll have a stronger foundation for future growth. Also, a stock stroke 351, or even a stroked W (393 or 408) will be able to make more than your desired power levels with much less effort, and in the end be more streetable, since you won't have to rev it as high or run as much boost as you would with a smaller engine.

That said, you can pretty much open a catalog, close your eyes, and randomly pick parts and make 375hp NA with a 331 or 347. With a little bit more effort, you can make 375hp with a NA H/C/I 302.

Isn't the 1220 one of the smaller Paxton units?
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Jun 22, 2010
#4
  • Jun 22, 2010
  • #4
Yea, the paxton 1220 is the standard kit. Figured I would go 331 and run low boost maybe 6-8 psi with a power pipe.

Thinking about it more, if I do plan on getting a cobra in within the next few months, id prob be happy with a streetable 331 with the paxton. As long as I dont get too crazy, the block should hold up pretty well right?
 
F

FoxGT87

5 Year Member
Aug 1, 2009
1,518
8
83
St.pete FL
Jun 22, 2010
#5
  • Jun 22, 2010
  • #5
would a 351 and a paxton be much different than stroking a 302? as far as cost goes? i mean swap out the 302 for a 351 probably save a few bucks, swap out the stock 351 cam and throw the paxton on and call it a day until you want more power and then stroke that?
 

lickem

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
62
0
0
lake elsinore ca
Jul 18, 2010
#6
  • Jul 18, 2010
  • #6
NikwoaC said:
You'll spend a little more building and installing the 351W in your car, but you'll have a stronger foundation for future growth. Also, a stock stroke 351, or even a stroked W (393 or 408) will be able to make more than your desired power levels with much less effort, and in the end be more streetable, since you won't have to rev it as high or run as much boost as you would with a smaller engine.
Click to expand...

+1 couldnt agree more.

to do the 351 u will need a few different parts that arnt interchangable with the 302 but in the long run its more than worth it.

parts that dont interchange. headers, manifold, dizzy, balancer, flywheel, oilpan, fuel rails

the first time i took my car to the track with an a-trim vortech at only 4psi i ran a 11.84 at 121.81 mph and i have very little suspension work done. this is also with no tune, only me screwing around aimlessly with my pms. as u can see my et and my mph do not match at all. that pass was only a 1.9 60 foot. with some suspension work and nothing else done at that mph id be dipping into the 10's.

now since ive tossed the a-trim and now have a sq-si trim and run it at 6-7psi if i got a good tune id probably be mid 10's with the suspension work as well.

did i mention my car has got a high of 20.88 mpg on the highway as well and i drive it almost an hour and a half to camp pendleton 1 way everyday.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
690
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
582
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Help with Engine Build
  • 93gtmustang
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
740
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?