• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Engine Mounts - Rubber vs Poly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Nov 16, 2020

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,848
224
Massachusetts
Nov 16, 2020
#1
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #1
What's the go-to for engine mounts these days? Many older threads list buying OEM Ford mounts, but those are long gone. ALl we are left with are cheap parts store mounts, and poly mounts.

Looks like there is only one manufacturer of the stock style mounts. (Even LMR says this). so do I stick with something like this..

Mustang Heavy Duty Motor Mount Kit (84-95) 5.0 - LMR

Upgrade your motor mounts to the more desirable 1984-1995 Mustang heavy duty mounts for better support with this Heavy Duty Motor Mount Kit!
lmr.com

Or do I go with a poly engine mount like this? The energy suspension mount mimics the convertible style mount.

Motor Mount - Ford Mustang - Energy Suspension 4.1122

Ford Mustang Thunderbird Cougar Continental replacement Motor Mount made by Energy Suspension. 2 Year Warranty. Free Shipping. Part Number 4.1122
www.energysuspensionparts.com
I can get them from Rockauto.com for $175 shipped with the 5% discount. However, I can also get $15 stock rubber mounts like the LRS mounts.


I will be running a stock-style OEM trans mount with both. My use of the car is strictly street cruising, so debating which ones would be the best to go with here. $175 for poly, or $30 for OEM-style rubber.
 
Last edited: Nov 16, 2020

dgollem

20+ Year Stangneter
May 5, 2004
211
33
49
Waldorf MD
Nov 16, 2020
#2
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #2
Strictly Street cruising spend the $30.00 on the rubber mounts and use the rest for gas. If anything the poly mounts will transfer more vibration to the chassis. My 2 cents worth.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,848
224
Massachusetts
Nov 16, 2020
#3
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #3
dgollem said:
Strictly Street cruising spend the $30.00 on the rubber mounts and use the rest for gas. If anything the poly mounts will transfer more vibration to the chassis. My 2 cents worth.
Click to expand...

SInce i made the original post and now, i've done some research on the OEM-style mounts available and have read nothing but terrible reviews. Holes drilled in the wrong spots and such. Pioneer 602725 and 602726 seem to be the "best" of the OE style rubber out there, and their reviews are quite terrible.

Reading reviews on the energy suspension mounts, it doesn't seem too harsh....would like some feedback from those who went rubber to the energy suspension parts.

I ended up buying both styles on Amazon. I'll compare in hand and see how they mount up and just return the ones I don't use.
 
Last edited: Nov 16, 2020
Reactions: Potomus Pete

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Nov 16, 2020
#4
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #4
Steel LMR solids. Bad reputation , but I like them. No vibration, and you feel the road and the power. Plus they raised my motor about two inches. Only fourty bucks. If you dont like them throw them in a bucket or CL em. I have stock tranny mount.
 
Reactions: elarm1

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,848
224
Massachusetts
Nov 16, 2020
#5
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #5
Raising the motor is a non-starter. With my intake spacer, i'm already close to the stock hood blanket. I need to swap to the vert mounts.

Either way, I ordered both and will return whichever one doesn't sweet talk me into keeping them.
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Nov 16, 2020
#6
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #6
Vert mounts are one inch higher , are they not?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,848
224
Massachusetts
Nov 16, 2020
#7
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #7
Potomus Pete said:
Vert mounts are one inch higher , are they not?
Click to expand...

lower than hardtop mounts

all 92 and 93s got the vert style mounts
 

Essn95

5 Year Member
Jun 21, 2017
817
622
113
Nov 16, 2020
#8
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #8
I have the energy red poly mounts and I notice no difference in NVH from my dad's 94 with intact rubber mounts. It is hard to get a direct comparison as my car has more suspension mods so I cannot speak to the "performance" benefit but they work fine and the fitment is perfect.
I had the part store cheap rubber version. They simply did not fit. We spent an entire day to no avail and decided to dish out the extra cash for the poly. They went in without a problem. That alone makes them worth it to me, shouldn't have to clearance replacement mounts. and plus, they look pretty under there!
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Nov 16, 2020
#9
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #9
I have the auto parts store vert mounts. I installed them when I first got the car 4 years ago and have had no issues with them. They did drop the motor a little bit over the stock 91 mounts. From what I can remember I had to do a little bit of grinding to get them to fit right.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 16, 2020
#10
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • #10
I used stock replacement vert mounts from Rock Auto when we did my 393 build.
They definitely helped to lower the engine a bit but the drivers side locating dowel wouldn't line up
with it's corresponding hole.
It finally agreed to locate itself after many cuss words , pry bars and beating !
 
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
848
133
Lafayette,IN
Nov 17, 2020
#11
  • Nov 17, 2020
  • #11
Stock replacement mounts here as well.I think I had to grind off one of the locating tabs but other than that no issues.
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Nov 17, 2020
#12
  • Nov 17, 2020
  • #12
I have solid mounts. on my vortech'd 306. No complaints here. I like the gyration of the car at idle!
 
E

ebone84

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 8, 2004
125
40
39
Nov 17, 2020
#13
  • Nov 17, 2020
  • #13
I just changed mine energy suspension engine and trans sits up nice and straight .... I’ll have the car started in a week but I’m quite sure I’ll be happy with them ....the rubber ones did seem flimsy
 

Attachments

  • EF7DE416-D77A-49A4-B942-0F81A40B054F.webp
    160.5 KB · Views: 323
  • C9220847-61F1-411A-A7BE-1366AE432050.webp
    227.3 KB · Views: 280
  • C3B72CA6-F76E-4CF5-ABE8-0A1EA193BFB0.webp
    98.2 KB · Views: 293
E

ebone84

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 8, 2004
125
40
39
Nov 17, 2020
#14
  • Nov 17, 2020
  • #14
One of the bolt holes engine mount was stripped now I have to heli coil or time sert the stripped threads
 

Attachments

  • 12E67CCC-D239-4D82-8424-8D2A7D1BEAE7.webp
    191 KB · Views: 268
  • 9221624F-C9CE-492F-9B05-9D80F6E74C8E.webp
    195.6 KB · Views: 250

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,791
884
143
Nov 18, 2020
#15
  • Nov 18, 2020
  • #15
I have Prothane engine and tranny mounts. No complaints and no issues installing (from what I remember), 3 years and 12,000 km later.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Nov 18, 2020
#16
  • Nov 18, 2020
  • #16
ebone84 said:
One of the bolt holes engine mount was stripped now I have to heli coil or time sert the stripped threads
Click to expand...
Into steel, I would use a helicoil. Another car group I belong to debated which was best to repair aluminum block threads for head studs. A machinist did destruction testing on various repair gadgets into aluminum, and the Timecert was the strongest. But with sideways (sheer) force rather than pulling forces on this bolt hole, steel to steel seems like a better choice. Besides, no electrolysis will be involved.
 
E

ebone84

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 8, 2004
125
40
39
Nov 19, 2020
#17
  • Nov 19, 2020
  • #17
Thanks..... ordered a thread chaser..... hopefully I can clean them up just to get a little bite ...
 

pats91

15 Year Member
Mar 6, 2007
124
74
48
Gladstone, MO
Nov 19, 2020
#18
  • Nov 19, 2020
  • #18
I've had the Energy Suspension engine and trans mounts on my car since 2002, unsure of how many miles they have now. I don't have any complaints.
 

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,964
1,613
153
nevada
Nov 20, 2020
#19
  • Nov 20, 2020
  • #19
Solid mounts from blue oval industries, got over 100k miles on em, no problemos
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,848
224
Massachusetts
Nov 21, 2020
#20
  • Nov 21, 2020
  • #20
Both sets came in. The ES pieves are nice and heavy and well made. The parts store mounts seem cheap. They don’t even fit well. Both sides will need tweaking just to bolt onto the engine. One even looks like it was used.

if I could get oem Ford rubber mounts, I’d likely run those. But I can’t

fortunately I bought the rubber ones on Amazon so back they go. I’ll be using the poly
 
Last edited: Nov 21, 2020
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
122
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Motor Mount Question
  • Willybill32
  • Aug 12, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
459
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2024
nickyb
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
523
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Engine Bad engine shaking at idle
  • sav22rem22
  • Jan 2, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 2, 2024
sav22rem22
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
557
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?