• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 Engine Refresh Advice Wanted

  • Thread starter Thread starter RaggedGT
  • Start date Start date Dec 5, 2017
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 5, 2017
#1
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #1
I mentioned in my no progress-progress thread that I wanted to pull the engine out of my ‘95 GT while the transmission is off being rebuilt .
I’m having the original transmission that’s currently not in the car (long story lol.) rebuilt,I’ll be dropping it off with the builder in January.
I plan to pull the motor after Christmas ,right now I’m trying to research and compile a parts list for some small performance upgrades,and mostly drivability upgrades.
The current 5.0 is a 0.30 over stock block/stock bottom end engine with e7 heads,leaky shorty headers and a letter cam that does not play nice with the computer.
The main reason for the refresh is I want to do a H/C/I swap and fix the oil leaks.
My intentions for the car are just to make it a driver with a mild hope for a 300HP goal

The parts list I have come up with so far (which is subject to change depending on the suggestions of the collective.)

• Mountaineer GT40 upper/lower intake.
(Owned.)


•GT40 cylinder heads.
(Owned. In storage somewhere.)


•Fel Pro gasket set.
(Recommendations?)


•ARP Head bolts.


•New lifters.
(Recommendations?)

•And rocker arms.
(Recommendations?)

•Tfs 1 Cam.

•Cloyes timing chain.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 5, 2017
#2
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #2
I also plan to put on a set of long tube headers.
(Owned,not these pictured,but very similar.)

Looking at an X pipe .
(Recommendations?)

And I would like to add in a set of High flow converters.

And when I get the freshly rebuilt aode back,id like to add an external cooler.

I remember reading somewhere on here about adding high heat resistant magnets in the oil pan to help keep debri in check-maybe @jrichker said it ?? I’d like to add a couple if I can find ‘em.

And it could really use a good detailing.


So that’s where I am at folks. Ideas? Insights? Advice?
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Dec 5, 2017
#3
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #3
9333pt1 for head gaskets .

1pc oil pan gasket

Ptfe style rear main seal

I like Harland sharp rockers . Scorpions I know guys use too and work but may be on the noisy side .

Frpp lifters work I have had them over 7k rpm


Also I'd get the rubber style valve cover gaskets over the cork ones in that kit

I believe Alex parts sells springs for that cam to go with your heads.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 5, 2017
#4
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #4
TOOLOW91 said:
9333pt1 for head gaskets .

1pc oil pan gasket

Ptfe style rear main seal

I like Harland sharp rockers . Scorpions I know guys use too and work but may be on the noisy side .

Frpp lifters work I have had them over 7k rpm


Also I'd get the rubber style valve cover gaskets over the cork ones in that kit

I believe Alex parts sells springs for that cam to go with your heads.
Click to expand...
would you recommend these rockers? https://www.summitracing.com/parts/csp-s4003/overview/make/ford

and this valve spring kit? https://www.alexsparts.com/sb-ford-gt40p-drop-in-valve-springs-kit-hyd-roller-580-lift/
Thanks jeff
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 5, 2017
#5
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #5
RaggedGT said:
would you recommend these rockers? https://www.summitracing.com/parts/csp-s4003/overview/make/ford

and this valve spring kit? https://www.alexsparts.com/sb-ford-gt40p-drop-in-valve-springs-kit-hyd-roller-580-lift/
Thanks jeff
Click to expand...

Probably better to just get pedastal mount rockers on stock heads. They are easier to install, and less hassle.

Kurt
 
Reactions: RangerJoe, Hoytster, Fordfreak93 and 1 other person

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,506
203
polk county florida
Dec 5, 2017
#6
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #6
Sounds like a plan to me
Get after it, I mean after the holidays of course.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Dec 5, 2017
#7
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #7
RaggedGT said:
would you recommend these rockers? https://www.summitracing.com/parts/csp-s4003/overview/make/ford

and this valve spring kit? https://www.alexsparts.com/sb-ford-gt40p-drop-in-valve-springs-kit-hyd-roller-580-lift/
Thanks jeff
Click to expand...
Like Revhead said you'll want a pedestal mount instead of a stud mount rocker it will be much easier .

I think those springs should do the trick
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 5, 2017
#8
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #8
I guess it depends on what your long term goals are.
For me rockers have always required that the stock pedestals be milled away, and then you use studs, guide plates, and hardened pushrods.
$$$.
But that would be the forward thinking Raggedy, planning one day to change over to an aluminum head. The rationale being that Having all this stuff now makes the future conversion so much easier on the budget.

But,....

If all you ever envision is a certain power limit using those GT 40 heads, and you stick with it, then save the money, buy the pedestal rockers, and build to that end.

$.

Whatever you do,...do not use the stock timing chain you have pictured. It'll be a worn out timing chain well before you decide to change out the cam.

And I'm the one with the magnets in the pan,..and Jrichker is the guy that'll tell you where to get them.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT and General karthief

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,826
10,506
203
polk county florida
Dec 5, 2017
#9
  • Dec 5, 2017
  • #9
https://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=D82SH
Here ya go, thanks to jrichker
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 6, 2017
#10
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #10
revhead347 said:
Probably better to just get pedastal mount rockers on stock heads. They are easier to install, and less hassle.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Thanks man,I’ve found a few different pedestal mount 1.6 sets,including the Harand Sharps Jeff recommends. Pretty sure that’s the route I’m going to go.

TOOLOW91 said:
Like Revhead said you'll want a pedestal mount instead of a stud mount rocker it will be much easier .

I think those springs should do the trick
Click to expand...

Thanks again

madmike1157 said:
I guess it depends on what your long term goals are.
For me rockers have always required that the stock pedestals be milled away, and then you use studs, guide plates, and hardened pushrods.
$$$.
But that would be the forward thinking Raggedy, planning one day to change over to an aluminum head. The rationale being that Having all this stuff now makes the future conversion so much easier on the budget.

But,....

If all you ever envision is a certain power limit using those GT 40 heads, and you stick with it, then save the money, buy the pedestal rockers, and build to that end.

$.

Whatever you do,...do not use the stock timing chain you have pictured. It'll be a worn out timing chain well before you decide to change out the cam.

And I'm the one with the magnets in the pan,..and Jrichker is the guy that'll tell you where to get them.
Click to expand...

Waay back when I got the car,I had dreams of aluminum heads,Big cam,blower, Holley efi etc. even was collecting parts (not the gt40 parts I have now lol.) but after two transmissions,three years of being parked . I just want to drive it. And have it as reliable a driver as it can be. What timing chain would you recommend? Thanks mike
karthief said:
https://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=D82SH
Here ya go, thanks to jrichker
Click to expand...
Awesome, thanks man
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 6, 2017
#11
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #11
RaggedGT said:
Thanks man,I’ve found a few different pedestal mount 1.6 sets,including the Harand Sharps Jeff recommends. Pretty sure that’s the route I’m going to go.



Thanks again



Waay back when I got the car,I had dreams of aluminum heads,Big cam,blower, Holley efi etc. even was collecting parts (not the gt40 parts I have now lol.) but after two transmissions,three years of being parked . I just want to drive it. And have it as reliable a driver as it can be. What timing chain would you recommend? Thanks mike

Awesome, thanks man
Click to expand...
Any of a number of double true roller chain sets..
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,145
17,841
224
Massachusetts
Dec 6, 2017
#12
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #12
Double roller. That one you pictured isn't a double roller. Cloyes makes a really good one


I'm going with a new set of FRpP lifters with my build. They make two different ones. R302 is stock, h302 has a ceramic check vskve for higher RPM. Unsure if that's really necessary on a gt40 head setup.

I got the R302s
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Dec 6, 2017
#13
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #13
Don't know if this was mentioned as I skimmed through this. You said ARP head bolts but I would use ARP head studs, not head bolts. If you change heads in the future it's easier with the studs. At least I think it is.

Chris
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 6, 2017
#14
  • Dec 6, 2017
  • #14
Mstng93SSP said:
Don't know if this was mentioned as I skimmed through this. You said ARP head bolts but I would use ARP head studs, not head bolts. If you change heads in the future it's easier with the studs. At least I think it is.

Chris
Click to expand...

I'd have to agree with this. The difference in price is negligible in the scheme of things. The strength difference in the studs isn't an issue for your setup, but the studs make it easier to install. With the studs you put the teflon on the bottom thread, and lube up the top thread. Gives you much more accurate torque when you screw it down. With bolts you have to put the telflon on the only thread you have, and it can throw off the torque a little. ARP only offers bolts because some of the older cars (Old Mustang, Maverick, etc) don't have much space between the strut towers, and you don't have enough room to put the heads on after the studs are installed. It's obviously not an issue on a late model Mustang; all kinds of room.

Kurt
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP and RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 9, 2017
#15
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #15
GT40 questions for you guys-
I have the intake,elbow and throttle body from the mountaineer. Is the mountaineer throttle body much of an upgrade to my stock throttle body?
I have the mountaineer fuel rails,but only a few of the injectors, would it be worth it to get the rest of the injectors from the junk yard,or just use my current injectors?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Dec 9, 2017
#16
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #16
I believe the mountaineer throttle body is either a 60 or 65 14mm, it is bigger than the mustang, but it needs to be missed to work. There are some write ups on it.

Joe
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 9, 2017
#17
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #17
The rails will only work if your fuel lines run on the passenger side like a 4 cylinder. Even then you have to make custom lines from the body fuel lines past the exhaust and to the truck lines.

Unless you're turbo like me...still made custom lines but worked out perfect.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Dec 9, 2017
#18
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #18
i guess im the only one who doesnt want to lift a heavy iron head over studs and find bolts easier? weird. the whole ptfe/lube thing is a bit of a moot point on a low-end build like this btw, the ptfe will still lube the threads enough for an accurate enough torque reading with the average torque wrench. now if you were doing a big 100hp+ build, yes its more important (you'd also want better torque measuring tools than what most home shops have)

the explorer/mountaineer tb is 65mm, and would be about the right size for a gt40 setup after you adapt the linkage (theres a writeup around there somewhere by either jrichter or tmoss). use the mustang rails, injectors can be either/or, theyre both 19lb, the explorer ones are updated with a better spray pattern but either will run fine.

id avoid the gasket "kits" and just piece together what you need, the kits dont always (ever really) come with the best available quality for every surface. fel-pro 9333 for heads, 93334 or 1250s3 for the lower intake, os34508r pan, vs13264t valve covers, either fel-pro timing gasket.

i used the stock mustang rockers and lifters back with my gt40 setup, rollers are fine if you feel like spending the money, but a stud conversion imo is more money than its worth. either way, measure for pushrod length, i needed the next .050" longer (and a pedestal shim kit cause youll probably only need .020-.030" longer for proper geometry but pusrods come in .050 increments) with my tfs1/gt40 setup to get the rockers quiet.

timing chain, ive used billet ones from tfs (was in the top end kit) and one from cloyes, the cloyes fit better and tighter, very burr-tastic though. you want double roller (even in a stock setup), timing advance/retard is......meh, up to you, and how much effort you want to put into double checking and measuring.
 
Reactions: General karthief, RangerJoe and RaggedGT

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 9, 2017
#19
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #19
90sickfox said:
The rails will only work if your fuel lines run on the passenger side like a 4 cylinder. Even then you have to make custom lines from the body fuel lines past the exhaust and to the truck lines.

Unless you're turbo like me...still made custom lines but worked out perfect.
Click to expand...

I know I brought up the mountaineer rails-but the question I meant to ask was reguarding the injectors,I’ve seen a lot of people say explorer/mountaineer injectors have a better spray pattern/efficiency
lol . Thanks man,as always I appreciate your help

Chuckman said:
i guess im the only one who doesnt want to lift a heavy iron head over studs and find bolts easier? weird. the whole ptfe/lube thing is a bit of a moot point on a low-end build like this btw, the ptfe will still lube the threads enough for an accurate enough torque reading with the average torque wrench. now if you were doing a big 100hp+ build, yes its more important (you'd also want better torque measuring tools than what most home shops have)

the explorer/mountaineer tb is 65mm, and would be about the right size for a gt40 setup after you adapt the linkage (theres a writeup around there somewhere by either jrichter or tmoss). use the mustang rails, injectors can be either/or, theyre both 19lb, the explorer ones are updated with a better spray pattern but either will run fine.

id avoid the gasket "kits" and just piece together what you need, the kits dont always (ever really) come with the best available quality for every surface. fel-pro 9333 for heads, 93334 or 1250s3 for the lower intake, os34508r pan, vs13264t valve covers, either fel-pro timing gasket.

i used the stock mustang rockers and lifters back with my gt40 setup, rollers are fine if you feel like spending the money, but a stud conversion imo is more money than its worth. either way, measure for pushrod length, i needed the next .050" longer (and a pedestal shim kit cause youll probably only need .020-.030" longer for proper geometry but pusrods come in .050 increments) with my tfs1/gt40 setup to get the rockers quiet.

timing chain, ive used billet ones from tfs (was in the top end kit) and one from cloyes, the cloyes fit better and tighter, very burr-tastic though. you want double roller (even in a stock setup), timing advance/retard is......meh, up to you, and how much effort you want to put into double checking and measuring.
Click to expand...

Good info,thank you. I like the idea of ARP studs,and installing them and the heads with the engine outta the car probably isn’t bad. But I was leaning towards bolts Incase down the road I ever have to pull a head with it in the car lol.
I found a cloyes double roller set I’m goung to order,and I gave up on the gasket set. Will piece one together.
I may look into reusing my stock rockers-they really only have like 15K on ‘em since the last re fresh.
How did you like the tfs1 and GT40’s?
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 9, 2017
#20
  • Dec 9, 2017
  • #20
RangerJoe said:
I believe the mountaineer throttle body is either a 60 or 65 14mm, it is bigger than the mustang, but it needs to be missed to work. There are some write ups on it.

Joe
Click to expand...
Thanks man- I know the explorer/mountaineer Tb is 65mm, and the stock Tb on my ‘94 is 60mm.
So I guess my question is- would it be worth converting the 65mm to work with the 60mm’s linkage?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
250
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
567
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
505
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?