• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

ET gain with skinnies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brianj5600
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2007

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 26, 2007
#1
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #1
I am curious if anyone has any experience with swapping to lighter/smaller wheel/tire combos. The wheels and tires on my car now weigh 46 lbs each. I am curious how much I am giving up ET wise vs skinnies. I will report back to back results on 11/4.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Oct 26, 2007
#2
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #2
brianj5600 said:
I am curious if anyone has any experience with swapping to lighter/smaller wheel/tire combos. The wheels and tires on my car now weigh 46 lbs each. I am curious how much I am giving up ET wise vs skinnies. I will report back to back results on 11/4.
Click to expand...

Common rule of thumb is that 100lbs=1/10th.

Based on the lower weight, the better weight distribution, and better aerodynamics, I'd guess a 0.1 second drop in ET.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 26, 2007
#3
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #3
100 lbs = .1 is a good rule for weight that does not rotate. Things like rotating assembly in the engine, transmission internals, driveshaft, etc all eat HP. All these parts, including wheels and tires, slow acceleration not only trying to move them forward, but also accelerating them in a circular motion.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 26, 2007
#4
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #4
brianj5600 said:
100 lbs = .1 is a good rule for weight that does not rotate. Things like rotating assembly in the engine, transmission internals, driveshaft, etc all eat HP. All these parts, including wheels and tires, slow acceleration not only trying to move them forward, but also accelerating them in a circular motion.
Click to expand...
I was thinking the same. But don't know if you'll a ton of lose because the front tires are not in the actual process, like say the rear tires.I mean to say I think you would gain alot more if you dropped 46lbs from each back tire.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 26, 2007
#5
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #5
My slicks are on 94 V6 wheels. They weigh 26 lbs tire and wheel each. The way I see it they both start at 0 mph and have to be accelerated to 90+ mph. When I drag raced my motorcycle, I could power wheelie to the 330 light and when the front tire touched down you could really tell the front tire was not turning. It felt like I pumped the front brake. Instead of spreading out the energy to accelerate the front wheel, it was all absorbed in a split second.
Did Rich say something about being able to tell when he is serious because he has the skinnies on the front, in another thread? Has he ran both at the track, and could he tell a difference?
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 27, 2007
#6
  • Oct 27, 2007
  • #6
brianj5600 said:
Did Rich say something about being able to tell when he is serious because he has the skinnies on the front, in another thread? Has he ran both at the track, and could he tell a difference?
Click to expand...
I don't know if he saw a difference. But I can't believe you remembered that. I got a kick when he wrote that. I'll ask him when he gets back from hunting to reply.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Oct 27, 2007
#7
  • Oct 27, 2007
  • #7
you should notice a differance..your still pushing them..your losing friction and rotating weight..i would say a tenth or two.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
95
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
406
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
121
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
683
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?