• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Exhaust Choices for a 87 GT, Prefer Not to go Flowmaster

  • Thread starter Thread starter Todd Hanna
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

atey950

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
516
60
59
Southeastern PA
Jan 16, 2013
#21
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #21
I been thru, dynomax, flows, and Mac. I have Mac on my car now and it's my favorite so far. No one can say they have "the best sounding exhaust"...it's totally subjective.

Here's idle vid of equal shorties, o/r x pipe and Mac flowpaths

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,037
1,625
194
NJ
Jan 16, 2013
#22
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #22
ratio411 said:
Yeah, like I said, you'll get a million and one varying opinions...
I have had several Mac products and love them for quality and fit.
They are not as expensive because they are not made out of high end materials or have high end band clamps, and that sort of thing.
The SLP, for example, has all this, and costs twice as much, but sounds like ass. So it's all in the eye/ear of the beholder, as well as the depth of your wallet.

I love Mac stuff.
Click to expand...

I've had plenty of mac parts, all have been replaced not because i wanted to, but they fell apart.
Sounds is subjective, so as what sound people like, that's personal opinion,, but quality and fit i consider to be fact rather than opinion.
By saying the quality of mac is good is like saying every exhaust is good. It's the bottom of the barrel and if you live in the north and daily drive any mac products, they just aren't going to last. The materials are cheap and thin, then you mandrel bend it and it gets stretched in the bends, some actually rot from the inside out.
I speak from experience.


Als0 someone who has also had mac mufflers and flowmasters, IMO, they sound very similar.

Exhaust sucks to do two three times, it's money in the garbage, just buy the good stuff from the get go, in the end it will cost you less. A 10 year old bassani x pipe looks better than a 1 year old mac h pipe.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 16, 2013
#23
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #23
atey950 said:
I been thru, dynomax, flows, and Mac. I have Mac on my car now and it's my favorite so far. No one can say they have "the best sounding exhaust"...it's totally subjective.

Here's idle vid of equal shorties, o/r x pipe and Mac flowpaths

Click to expand...
Where is the link?
 

Old Skooler

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2012
248
43
39
Jan 16, 2013
#24
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #24
Right now I have bassani long tubes, h-pipe and SS bassani cat back and it sounds great. The past 6 or so mustangs I've used all Mac products and thought the car sounded great. Prior to that it was what ever headers and h pipes I could get cheap with flow master 40 series cat back and that's what got me hooked on mustangs. I never bought a mustang for a quiet ride and I love the drone, that's what these cars are all about raw, loud and fun our generations 69 camaro's.

All the exhausts mentioned sound good and perform about the same listen to clips on you tube and decide for yourself. It's not the most expensive upgrade you can always change.
 

Old Skooler

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2012
248
43
39
Jan 16, 2013
#25
  • Jan 16, 2013
  • #25
Those flow paths sound nice
 

atey950

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
516
60
59
Southeastern PA
Jan 18, 2013
#26
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #26
Old Skooler said:
Right now I have bassani long tubes, h-pipe and SS bassani cat back and it sounds great. The past 6 or so mustangs I've used all Mac products and thought the car sounded great. Prior to that it was what ever headers and h pipes I could get cheap with flow master 40 series cat back and that's what got me hooked on mustangs. I never bought a mustang for a quiet ride and I love the drone, that's what these cars are all about raw, loud and fun our generations 69 camaro's.

All the exhausts mentioned sound good and perform about the same listen to clips on you tube and decide for yourself. It's not the most expensive upgrade you can always change.
Click to expand...
I agree 100%. Sometimes I wonder why people complain about the drone. It's part of the car. I f'n love it!
 

atey950

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
516
60
59
Southeastern PA
Jan 18, 2013
#27
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #27
ratio411 said:
Where is the link?
Click to expand...
It's in my original reply. YouTube "mcb98". That's my YouTube username. It will come up.
 

MikeUrban

Member
May 30, 2010
187
1
19
Chantilly, VA
Jan 18, 2013
#28
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #28
On my last car I had bbk shortys, offroad H pipe, and flowmaster 40s. That setup isn't too loud unless you're on it, and at idle it's nice and throaty. But after hearing I'm pretty much sold on long tubes, offroad H and spintechs for my new project.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 18, 2013
#29
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #29
MikeUrban said:
On my last car I had bbk shortys, offroad H pipe, and flowmaster 40s. That setup isn't too loud unless you're on it, and at idle it's nice and throaty. But after hearing I'm pretty much sold on long tubes, offroad H and spintechs for my new project.
Click to expand...

Sounds similar to my car, but way rattier and not as clean sounding. That car sounds like the valvetrain is blowing out the tailpipes.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 19, 2013
#30
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #30
atey950 said:
It's in my original reply. YouTube "mcb98". That's my YouTube username. It will come up.
Click to expand...
Nobody's links are coming up in the thread for me. ???
 

Mintsick

10 Year Member
Jan 6, 2007
589
39
68
West Lafayette, IN
Jan 20, 2013
#31
  • Jan 20, 2013
  • #31
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Sounds similar to my car, but way rattier and not as clean sounding. That car sounds like the valvetrain is blowing out the tailpipes.
Click to expand...

I think a big part of it is the dumps, this car would sound far better with tailpipes IMO.
 
Z

Zbanks1

New Member
Sep 16, 2012
17
0
2
Jan 25, 2013
#32
  • Jan 25, 2013
  • #32
I run bbk long tubes to a bbk off road x pipe and pypes m80 mufflers. It sounds really good. Not super loud, but loud enough.
 

Mr. Snrub

Active Member
Jan 24, 2012
153
50
39
uh... someplace far away. (Yes, that'll do.)
Jan 25, 2013
#33
  • Jan 25, 2013
  • #33
I dunno why everyone hates flowmaster so much.. lol.. I have 40's on my car now. I had a Mac catback on my old fox and I thought it sounded amazing. I may go that way again.
 

Angelv23

New Member
Jan 24, 2013
15
0
1
Jan 25, 2013
#34
  • Jan 25, 2013
  • #34
I would def have to say mac has one of the nicest and deepest sounding exhaust I've heard. Especially when u bury the pedal in the mat. I know everyone is high on flowmasters and they do sound great but mac is something a little different but it sounds great. Go on their website and they'll have sound clips. Ull be impressed
 

larrym1961

5 Year Member
Dec 18, 2010
570
36
49
Idaho Falls Id
Jan 26, 2013
#35
  • Jan 26, 2013
  • #35
I have had Flowmasters on my Mustang for 20 years, I have allways liked a side exit exhaust system. If I were to swap I would certainly be interested in a Spintech system.
 

cw50must

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2000
907
1
16
Mesa, AZ
Jan 26, 2013
#36
  • Jan 26, 2013
  • #36
I've had Flowmasters (both 2 and 3 chamberes, I'm old school so I don't know anything what series that is) Mac, Dynomax, and Edelbrock. I love the sound of my Edelbrock cat back, not even sure if you can buy it anymore, but it sounds different than anything else I've heard, I use it with unequal shorties and ORH. The Dynomax were my least favorite.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
222
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
844
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
G
1982 Mustang GL 5.0 single to dual exhaust conversion
  • Guyton
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
681
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2025
limp
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
516
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?