• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Fidanza lightweight flywheel anyone run one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89Stang
  • Start date Start date Nov 4, 2005

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
44
Savannah GA
www.geocities.com
Nov 4, 2005
#1
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #1
Anyone ever run one of these? We put one in our 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT 5 spd and man I love it. But I am unsure how one would feel in a mildly cammed 302. So was curious if anyone has ran one. The car will be needing a clutch soon anyway so it seems like a decent time to be doing one. So for those who have run one hows it feel and what do you think about it?

In our eclipse it made a nice difference. I ran a buddies 99 GT 5 spd. Before with the stock flywheel he would pull me through the whole rpm band. With the flywheel and a cold air intake he pulls me till about 3000 rpm then I will very slowly edge up on him. It takes hp to spin the heavier flywheel. So this made sense to me. But post up what you know and opinions are welcome.
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
44
Savannah GA
www.geocities.com
Nov 4, 2005
#2
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #2
anyone?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 4, 2005
#3
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #3
I run a fidanza aluminum flywheel in my car. I can not say what I gained b/c I did a 347 at the same time. This will be the last flywheel you ever need as they come with 28 and 50oz balance weights and a little bolt for 0 balance. Its just an awesome piece. If you have the money go for it as its a perfect time to swap.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
42
Western Massachusetts
Nov 4, 2005
#4
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #4
I run one. Its a very nice piece. So far I'm happy with it. I did lose a little low end, but it makes up for it in the upper rpms. People always bash the aluminum flywheels for street use even though they have never run one. I decided to take a chance and I am happy with it. I drive my car daily on the street and its fine, even with a Spec stg 3 clutch.
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
44
Savannah GA
www.geocities.com
Nov 4, 2005
#5
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #5
Yeah on our eclipse it made it a bit harder launching and the car no longer spins through 1st. But man does that needle swing a lot quicker. It also seems to take a bit more slipping and slightly more throttle to be smooth (still get going without going above 1500 rpms slipping) But I was curious how this flywheel might be with a B303 or F303 cam.
But good responses defintely still feeling good about getting one.

Anyone else?
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
42
Western Massachusetts
Nov 4, 2005
#6
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #6
I have an e-cam and so far its been fine. It is a little tough to get moving when trying to start off slow but you will get use to it. I would def. go aluminum over steel. The rpms seem to climb much quicker. It seriously feels like I ganged 15rwhp 4000rpm----->
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 4, 2005
#7
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #7
My engine isnt in a Fox body anymore, but I got a Fidanza when it went in my '68. Its not bad on the street and my car still has 3.00 gears and will do around 40 in 1st. You just slip it a little more and or give it more gas. It will still take off on level ground at idle, though. Crane 2031 cam with an advertised power band of 2000-5500.
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
43
Pensacola Florida
Nov 4, 2005
#8
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #8
People still say aluminum flywheels slow you down and all that but it sure doesnt seem to hurt 03-04 Cobras! They have them from the factory. There were some threads about this on the Corral and alot of the aluminum flywheel slowing you down theroys were disproven.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
47
Dallas, GA
Nov 4, 2005
#9
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #9
When I ordered my stroker kit at first I went with a steel flywheel, but then changed over to an alumimum before it was too late. A heavier flyweel is better for launch, but that is about it. Steel will also take heat better. Rotational weight is probally the worse kind.
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
43
Pensacola Florida
Nov 4, 2005
#10
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • #10
Yea, the thread basically said once the car was in motion any negatives on the launch would be overcome the rest of the time you are racing.

My friend pulled a 1.52 60 ft in his 03 Cobra with an aluminum flywheel. He drove another guy in the club's 04 Cobra with a KB 2.4, pulled a 1.60 60 ft on 17 inch BFG DR's.
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
44
Savannah GA
www.geocities.com
Nov 5, 2005
#11
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #11
yeah I figured since the thing needed a clutch soon anyway that doing a nice flywheel would be a good idea.

I am curious about one last thing that doesnt really matter.

For those people with cams that added the flywheel after their cam was the cam anymore pronounced? Our eclipse we obviously would be able to tell. But I was curious on a cammed mustang.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
49
PA
www.rnhperformance.com
Nov 5, 2005
#12
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #12
90mustangGT said:
When I ordered my stroker kit at first I went with a steel flywheel, but then changed over to an alumimum before it was too late. A heavier flyweel is better for launch, but that is about it. Steel will also take heat better. Rotational weight is probally the worse kind.
Click to expand...




Jason, you package will arrive next week
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 5, 2005
#13
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #13
89Stang said:
For those people with cams that added the flywheel after their cam was the cam anymore pronounced? Our eclipse we obviously would be able to tell. But I was curious on a cammed mustang.
Click to expand...

If it did, it was only slight. It might make more of a difference on a smaller engine where the flywheel accounts for more of the total rotating weight.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 5, 2005
#14
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #14
If your willing to deal with the little quirks (listed in the thread) of a AFW then get it...

I like billet steel myself.

Oh, and a 03/04 Cobra's times have very little to do with what flywheel it has. Plus the flywheel is bigger (whether it be al. or steel.) More mass. They are just some quickly setup cars.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
47
Dallas, GA
Nov 5, 2005
#15
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #15
Rick 91GT said:


Jason, you package will arrive next week
Click to expand...


I've been in a crappy mood today, but suddenly it just got a lot better!!!

HELL YEAH
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
43
Pensacola Florida
Nov 5, 2005
#16
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #16
5spd GT said:
If your willing to deal with the little quirks (listed in the thread) of a AFW then get it...

I like billet steel myself.

Oh, and a 03/04 Cobra's times have very little to do with what flywheel it has. Plus the flywheel is bigger (whether it be al. or steel.) More mass. They are just some quickly setup cars.
Click to expand...

How much bigger? 11.5? Some of them are running the Fidanza after they grenade the stocker.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 5, 2005
#17
  • Nov 5, 2005
  • #17
5spd GT said:
Oh, and a 03/04 Cobra's times have very little to do with what flywheel it has. Plus the flywheel is bigger (whether it be al. or steel.) More mass. They are just some quickly setup cars.
Click to expand...

And IMO most of that quickness is wasted on a drag strip. Like dragging a Roush or Saleen....bleh. Just a little off topic....
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
43
Pensacola Florida
Nov 6, 2005
#18
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #18
65ShelbyClone said:
And IMO most of that quickness is wasted on a drag strip. Like dragging a Roush or Saleen....bleh. Just a little off topic....
Click to expand...

Funny, my friend's 03 Cobra does 1.5 60 fts on the bottle and has run in the 10's with the eaton and no nitrous on the stock IRS. Then again it would be faster with a solid axle.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 6, 2005
#19
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #19
Speeds8erM-1 said:
Funny, my friend's 03 Cobra does 1.5 60 fts on the bottle and has run in the 10's with the eaton and no nitrous on the stock IRS. Then again it would be faster with a solid axle.
Click to expand...

I was implying that they have alot more potential than just going in a straight line...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
K
Severe Drivetrain Shaking
  • KeithM412
  • Jul 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
301
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 29, 2025
AeroCoupe
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
819
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
393
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?