• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Finally got some dyno numbers wanted some input.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69Rcode_Mach1
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2010

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 1, 2010
#1
  • Mar 1, 2010
  • #1
Hey guys I finally got the Mach on the dyno. Some minor issues but I will be posting up the sheet as soon as they email it to me, their printer wasn't working. So it put down 337rwhp can't remember tq off the top of my head I did it before I put it away for the winter. The thing was running very rich. I believe it was at 11:1 air/fuel ratio, and shooting some smoke out the tailpipes. I am getting ready to take her on the road and probably do some more pulls in the next little bit as the weather gets better here. The guy at the dyno said to expect a nice bump once it gets tuned up correctly. The ignition kept dropping out past 6000 rpms as well so that is another thing I am going to be addressing since all I have is an MSD 6AL box, a new MSD distributor is in the plans. Given the combo the car should pull up to 7000rpms. Pulled the carb apart today to rejet and wanted some ideas. It had 72s in the primaries, and 81s in the secondaries. What ideal ratio should I be shooting for I have heard around 14.7 or so, the guy at the dyno said 13 seemed low for a naturally aspirated engine, what do some of you guys recommend I drop the jets to? It is a mighty demon 750 carb.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 1, 2010
#2
  • Mar 1, 2010
  • #2
12.5-13.0 is what I'd shoot for n/a. As far as ignition breaking up, some of that is probably due to being at 11-1 a/f. Lean it out some and maybe tighten up your plug gap.

14.7 a/f is your target cruise air fuel ratio.

I run a 6al an 8300 rpm so I doubt that's your issue at 6k.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Mar 1, 2010
#3
  • Mar 1, 2010
  • #3
1.7 rockers on a cam ground for 1.6? Hydraulic roller are not known for stability and your cam sounds like it is aggressive enough that the springs can not control the valve train with the extra ratio. That is my guess.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 2, 2010
#4
  • Mar 2, 2010
  • #4
Those lift figures in my sig are calculated with the 1.7 roller rockers they would be lower with the 1.6 ratio. I talked to lunati and edelbrock when I was putting the combo together, those valve springs should be able to withstand that cam. As far as the ignition goes, blown65 are you running a stock dizzy? I am running the 6AL box, blaster 2 coil, late style cap, with the FRPP 9mm wires. Still points though, and yes I did change the distributor gear to match the roller cam. This cam is not a retrofit either I used vertical link lifters so as to keep the high ramp rates of a roller cam.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 2, 2010
#5
  • Mar 2, 2010
  • #5
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
Those lift figures in my sig are calculated with the 1.7 roller rockers they would be lower with the 1.6 ratio. I talked to lunati and edelbrock when I was putting the combo together, those valve springs should be able to withstand that cam. As far as the ignition goes, blown65 are you running a stock dizzy? I am running the 6AL box, blaster 2 coil, late style cap, with the FRPP 9mm wires. Still points though, and yes I did change the distributor gear to match the roller cam. This cam is not a retrofit either I used vertical link lifters so as to keep the high ramp rates of a roller cam.
Click to expand...


oh, no I'm running a MSD dist.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 3, 2010
#6
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #6
How do you like your ignition setup? Which dizzy did you end up going with? Sorry it's taking so long to get the sheet, my buddy lost the number to the place and is trying to find it, it's a little ways away so I don't want to drive in.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 3, 2010
#7
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #7
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
How do you like your ignition setup? Which dizzy did you end up going with? Sorry it's taking so long to get the sheet, my buddy lost the number to the place and is trying to find it, it's a little ways away so I don't want to drive in.
Click to expand...


It like it, was getting a misfire around 8300-8400. Put a MSD digital 7 in this yr for more spark. Since I run Q16 it takes more spark since your adding even more fuel than just your regular race gas. Have not had a chance to run it yet with the new box/coil though. Also putting new valve springs in to cover that part.

Not sure on the dist, I'd have to go look. Its just a magnetic pickup vaccum advance dist, that is actually locked out at 34 degrees. I run no advance at all on my setup. 34 at idle and 34 at 8300.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 4, 2010
#8
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #8
Oh wow! I am not quite that extreme on the timing. I am still waiting for my guy to send me the sheet he said I should get it by Monday cause he doesn't know when the guy who did it will be in. I just want to get this thing dialed in and running right for this summer season so I can focus on the front suspension and braking system. The guy recommended dropping the jets from 72 to 70 on the primary and from 81 to 76 on the secondary. He is going to let me bring it in in a couple weeks and let me do some pulls $10 a pop and no tie down fees or rental fees to fine tune it. He wants to see what we can get the car to pull.
 
6

68RCodeConv

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
345
0
0
Houston, TX
Mar 4, 2010
#9
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #9
Hydraulic rollers tend to start floating right around 6000 because the valve train is so heavy and you can't run as much spring pressure with them as a solid roller. As a general rule of thumb if you want to rev beyond that you should go with a solid roller.

I also don't like the fact that you are running points. Ford used dual point distributors to deal with higher rpms.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Mar 4, 2010
#10
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #10
68RCodeConv said:
Hydraulic rollers tend to start floating right around 6000 because the valve train is so heavy and you can't run as much spring pressure with them as a solid roller. As a general rule of thumb if you want to rev beyond that you should go with a solid roller.
Click to expand...

kind of . . .

you do realize that guys have to run hydraulic rollers in NMRA real street right?

check that class out if you still think this way about HRs.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Mar 4, 2010
#11
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #11
Yeah but what they do is way out there. They run a ton pressure and run the cups down to like .009 of preload left. So it's a solid lifter, but hyd for the rules. And they let the valves bounce on the seats, and count on it. Not quite what he wants lol. I've seen link bars lifter come apart at 6700. Pops the clips right out of them

Think Brian is right though. You should be able to light of 11-1 afr N/A no problem. If it's breaking up, it's somewhere else.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Mar 4, 2010
#12
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #12
i would go with 68's in the primary and 77's in the secondary. that should get you to around 13:1 a/f ratio.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Mar 5, 2010
#13
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #13
If it still has a stock points distributer, that could be a problem. Did the WB show lean when it broke up at 6000? If it was misfiring it lets a lot of O2 into the exhaust and should show on the WB. It seems like valve float would still burn the fuel and O2 and have less effect on WB readings. Might be something to run by the dyno operator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need Some Dyno Video File Sizes
  • Noobz347
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 20, 2025
TOOLOW91
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
205
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
585
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
255
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?