• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Finally, some answers to the H vs ProChamber questions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Oct 16, 2006

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#1
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #1
Well guys, I had been running the prochamber for over 2 years now and wasn't all that happy with it. So, I borrowed a BBK h-pipe and put it on that same day. OMG, what a difference everywhere.

1. It's louder. Not annoying but rumbly and loud. Can hear it standing in front of my car, not only the back.
2. I can hear my cam lobe A LOT better.
3. Sounds more aggressive.
4. It's lighter, the box on the prochamber is open. I have no idea what the purpose of it is.
5. No more vibrations at 3k. I have no idea why my prochamber contributed to this, but it doesn't happen with the h.

6. My exhaust seems to flow a lot better. I can feel it in the gas pedal. By this I mean that the car feels lighter and not as sluggish as with the pro. It feels like it gets the air out quicker allowing more air to come in quicker and so on.
7. The scream at WOT is sick!
8. My car doesn't scrape as much.

I wouldn't recommend for anyone to get a pro over an h. I mean, I can't find a reason why. The reason I bought it was cause it was said to make more power, but it sure as hell didn't feel like it.

PS I have a prochamber for long tube headers for sale.
 

yellowstang1994

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
338
0
0
Oct 16, 2006
#2
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #2
Hmm, interesting. I have a prochamber and I hate how mine is the 2 peice design. I'm constantly scraping it and it constantly comes loose and starts leaking. I put the stock H pipe back on it just because I like ride quality better over my car feeling like a peice of crap. Even if it means it doesn't sound as good or run as fast. I always thought of getting an H-pipe or welding the prochamber into one peice and taking the flanges off in the middle.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#3
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #3
Do it, you won't regret it. And I have the mac flow paths as well.
 
T

tlee_20

New Member
Aug 3, 2006
48
0
0
Rogersville, TN
Oct 16, 2006
#4
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #4
yeah my car came with a prochamber when i bought it and i absolutely HATE IT!! ha ha

ps.. i too have a prochamber for sale. its for shorties ha ha
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
44
Baton Rouge, LA
www.72mach1.com
Oct 16, 2006
#5
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #5
Dang and all this time I loved my prochamber.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#6
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #6
sorry bud. i thought I loved it too. but after hearing my cam with the h, i hate it.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
44
Baton Rouge, LA
www.72mach1.com
Oct 16, 2006
#7
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #7
95Vert said:
sorry bud. i thought I loved it too. but after hearing my cam with the h, i hate it.
Click to expand...

No doubt it does mellow out the engine a bit - talking w/ sage2k the other day, it's almost like a 3rd muffler (the prochamber).
 
T

tlee_20

New Member
Aug 3, 2006
48
0
0
Rogersville, TN
Oct 16, 2006
#8
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #8
well what about an x pipe? pros and cons on them vs. h pipe
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Oct 16, 2006
#9
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #9
Stanger007 said:
Dang and all this time I loved my prochamber.
Click to expand...
You will get to hear my straigh pipes with the BBK H this weekend.

You will like it, trust me.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#10
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #10
I don't have the pros or cons of h vs x. I have a buddy with an x and I don't like it. Too raspy(metallic) for my taste.
 

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Oct 16, 2006
#11
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #11
i am running a prochamber with my mac longtubes and i really dont have any complaints. now i'm contemplating just getting a regular mac h pipe.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#12
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #12
don't get me wrong, the pro is a good piece but when you compare it to the h, it just doesn't match up. I forgot to mention that the drone has also minimized. The rpm drone range went from 1800-2100 down to 1100-1400 rpm. Good part about that is that I'm never in that rpm range which means that I hardly have drone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
381
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Yesterday at 2:45 PM
squeak93
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
337
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
919
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
608
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?