• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Fire and Ice

  • Thread starter Thread starter SN65
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 4 of 7 Next Last

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Sep 11, 2006
#61
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #61
SN65 said:
Check out this engine...



It is a Ford 250 that generates about 550 HP
Click to expand...

that's a nice engine
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Sep 12, 2006
#62
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #62
SN65 said:
Check out this engine...



It is a Ford 250 that generates about 550 HP
Click to expand...

Here is a link to the build for that car.
http://fordsix.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36629

John
 
E

eleanor_350

Member
May 20, 2003
92
0
6
Kentucky
Sep 12, 2006
#63
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #63
I don't know much about the inline six's but I did find a link to some australian engine parts for sale here on stangnet. I didn't know if any of these parts would useful your engine build.

http://classifieds.stangnet.com/showproduct.php?product=36982&cat=3
 
8

85 Turbo Bird

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
77
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Sep 12, 2006
#64
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #64
SN65 said:
I am considering extending the cage to the front of the car, but, in doing so, the cars become less practical for street use, which is a major consideration.

I am thinking about the "A" pillar problem. I have had a couple of ideas, but nothig that has jumped out and bit me yet.

I will keep working at it. The final product should be functional andthe design should be eligant when complete.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that it'd work for you but there was a post a month or so ago that linked to a detailed build of a 69 Mustang that had a "hidden" cage that went in the A-pillar to connect the front. I don't think that there's enough space in the car for you to hide the pipe but it's an idea none-the-less. Also, I'm not sure that a pipe from the cage exposed going along the A-pillar would be very "elegant".

Anyways, it sounds like everything is going to be amazing with these two cars (as is expected ) and everything will get sorted out. I will be paying close attention to both builds but especially the I-6 build. I'm looking forward to doing something slightly out of the ordinary when I finally build a Mustang and an I-6 might be the way to go.

Good luck and keep us posted.
 

65up2d8

Member
Mar 30, 2005
281
0
17
Memphis, TN
Sep 13, 2006
#65
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #65
85 Turbo Bird said:
I don't think that there's enough space in the car for you to hide the pipe but it's an idea none-the-less.
Click to expand...

It's possible, but you may have to roll down the quarter windows and have her stick her feet out of them.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Sep 13, 2006
#66
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #66
Yup! "Hide the Pipe" in a '65 should only be attempted buy young people who practice yoga! Especially in a coupe!
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Sep 27, 2006
#67
  • Sep 27, 2006
  • #67
Follow the link below for updated photos, etc...

http://sn65.com/Fire & Ice unibody reinforcement.htm
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 9, 2006
#68
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #68
So far we have reduced torsional deflection by 70% and we still have a few items to complete.

Here is a link showing all the mods made to date.

http://sn65.com/Fire%20&%20Ice%20unibody%20reinforcement.htm

Here are some photos showing the rocker, floor pan mods







Here is a photo showing the cowl, firewall, shock tower reinforcements.



We need to add the final shock tower brace and weld the floor to the rockers before we can take our final "test". After that, we can add the cage and see just how much we gain at that point.

Also, we are working on a modified Monty Carlo bar that not only helps maintain the distance between the shock towers, but also helps reduce overall front clip deflection.
 

Attachments

  • 06-09-27%20011.webp
    108.6 KB · Views: 296
  • 06-09-27%20012.webp
    111.5 KB · Views: 289
  • 06-09-27%20038.webp
    99.1 KB · Views: 327
  • 06-10-09%20027.webp
    100.5 KB · Views: 2,674

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Oct 9, 2006
#69
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #69
weight

Looks like good work as usual.
Do you have an idea of the final weight?
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 9, 2006
#70
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #70
As she sits right now, we have added about 120 lbs.

When completly assembled, I am guessing that we are going to be in the 3,000 lb range.
 
E

Eyeless_Seven

New Member
Sep 30, 2006
57
0
0
Oct 10, 2006
#71
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #71
Hi SN65.
Is the cowl tubing -one piece going thru the inner fender?
I tried to blow up the image but could not tell.
I will be following this closely, can we get this as a sticky or can someone tell me how to subscribe?
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Oct 11, 2006
#72
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #72
amazing work AGAIN!!! keep up the good work.
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 11, 2006
#73
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #73
Eyeless_Seven said:
Hi SN65.
Is the cowl tubing -one piece going thru the inner fender?
I tried to blow up the image but could not tell.
I will be following this closely, can we get this as a sticky or can someone tell me how to subscribe?
Click to expand...
Yes, the tube that runs along the cowl/firewall is one tube. We just had to cut 4 small holes. Two in the appron and two in the outer side cowl panel. After cutting the holes we just slipped the tube all the way through. At that point we just clamped it up and welded it in place.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Oct 11, 2006
#74
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #74
Did SN65 end up selling?
 
E

Eyeless_Seven

New Member
Sep 30, 2006
57
0
0
Oct 11, 2006
#75
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #75
The passenger side tower shows what looks to be a crack to the front of mounting hole for the UCA. Would it not have been easier to replace this before the braces were put in?
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 12, 2006
#76
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #76
1320stang said:
Did SN65 end up selling?
Click to expand...
E-bay only got up to 101,000. We need a bit more than that to let it go.

Wayne will be at SEMA with the car, so maybe we might get an offer. We are going to be in the MagnaFlow display, in the Overhaulin' compound. There will be a Boyd car, the SN65 and a Foose car on display.
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 12, 2006
#77
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #77
Eyeless_Seven said:
The passenger side tower shows what looks to be a crack to the front of mounting hole for the UCA. Would it not have been easier to replace this before the braces were put in?
Click to expand...
Good eyes...

If we were going to use the original suspension / shock tower setup, we would have freplaced it before hand. But, we will be installing a McPherson strut setup and we are going to be removing the inner section of the shock tower to get us a bit more header clearance for the Roush 427. That section with the crack will be gone.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Oct 12, 2006
#78
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #78
Hey -- I'll come say hi at SEMA.

What strut setup are you planning on using?
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Oct 12, 2006
#79
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #79
reenmachine said:
Hey -- I'll come say hi at SEMA.

What strut setup are you planning on using?
Click to expand...
Cool. Is you car going to be on display? If so, what booth?

We are building our own front strut setup using custom coil overs and SN95 spindles. We are also building our own 3 link w/watts link, coil over rear suspension.

Both of these, when complete, will be 100% bolt in assemblies. No welding required.

On another note...

A lot of people have made comment (no one on this forum) that the SN65 was a simple project because we didn't engineer anything. All we did was weld two cars together. Well I have to say that building these cars (even with all the custom features) is SO much easier to do. If everything goes as planned, we are going to finish 2 cars in a fraction of the time it took to build the SN65.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Oct 12, 2006
#80
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #80
SN65 said:
Cool. Is you car going to be on display? If so, what booth?

We are building our own front strut setup using custom coil overs and SN95 spindles. We are also building our own 3 link w/watts link, coil over rear suspension.

Both of these, when complete, will be 100% bolt in assemblies. No welding required.

On another note...

A lot of people have made comment (no one on this forum) that the SN65 was a simple project because we didn't engineer anything. All we did was weld two cars together. Well I have to say that building these cars (even with all the custom features) is SO much easier to do. If everything goes as planned, we are going to finish 2 cars in a fraction of the time it took to build the SN65.
Click to expand...
Not displaying -- just cruising the show. I'll definitely stop by to see you and the SN65 though.

One thing I've learned in everything I've done in life so far is that no matter what you do, there will always be critics. Moreover, if you lower yourself to their level by responding to them it just feeds their fire. Anyone who knows you-know-what from Shinola knows that a huge amount of time, creativity, and engineering went into the SN65. I can absolutely guarantee that whoever made those comments could never even dream of having what it takes to do what you did.

There are those out there who criticize the cars I build as well. I don't give a rat's ass. You've been around this board and others for long enough to see tons of people slamming Boyd, Foose, and all the others. Do you think they lose sleep over it?

Hell, when I worked at JPL I had a hand in building 2 Mars rovers that are successfully operating on a planet 200 million miles away, and I've walked into work there past people picketing claiming that is was all fake and a big conspiracy. There will always be critics of anything and everything.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 4 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
121
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
J
Help - SCT Woes
  • James banks
  • Jan 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
361
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 2, 2026
squeak93
A Fox Quest! Find Vanilla Ice's 5oh
  • Noobz347
  • Jul 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
826
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2025
FastDriver
F
My hello to StangNet and my "barnfind"
  • fratzke
  • Jan 20, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
705
The Welcome Wagon Feb 14, 2026
General karthief
B
Fuel 1990 mustang gt 5.0 no ground signal to fire injectors
  • brandyn200
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
245
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?