• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

First Road Test 2010 GT500 (Motor Trend Article)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox1x
  • Start date Start date Apr 6, 2009
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Apr 6, 2009
#1
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #1
Linky.. Clicky!!

2010 Ford Shelby GT500 - First Test - Motor Trend
 

Zippeh

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
691
0
16
North New Jersey
Apr 6, 2009
#2
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #2
0.96g lateral grip on MY.


I was worried MT would pick it apart, but hot damn that's a fine vehicle.

Quickly, someone pass me shots until this car being a DD sounds reasonable, almost necessary.
 
K

kyle_99gt

Member
Nov 4, 2008
166
1
16
Apr 6, 2009
#3
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #3
0-60 mph 4.7 sec*
Quarter mile 12.7 sec @ 118.1 mph*
Traction limited by low ambient and track temperatures.

of course they had to do it at the worst time possible for traction
 
N

Nitrous03GT

New Member
Nov 21, 2008
17
0
0
Apr 6, 2009
#4
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #4
kyle_99gt said:
0-60 mph 4.7 sec*
Quarter mile 12.7 sec @ 118.1 mph*
Traction limited by low ambient and track temperatures.

of course they had to do it at the worst time possible for traction
Click to expand...

haha, it should read - "traction limited due to lack of driving skill"

118 is a healthy trap speed, should see high 11's out of them without much trouble.
 
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Apr 6, 2009
#5
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #5
also here

First Drive: 2010 Ford Shelby GT500, Part 1 - Living on the (live axle) limit
 
S

SGILLHAM03cobra

New Member
Jun 8, 2006
18
0
0
Apr 6, 2009
#6
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #6
mototrend : blah

I must say motortrend comended the gt500 on its balance, performance and appearance but they can not drive for crap! please go to inside line for there first test drive!!! 0-60 in 4 to 4.3 seconds and 1/4 mile at 12.4 these guys actually put out the numbers ford said it would! i know there were weather factors for there test drive but they cant drive either so check it out if you want the real numbers.
 
K

kyle_99gt

Member
Nov 4, 2008
166
1
16
Apr 7, 2009
#7
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #7
SGILLHAM03cobra said:
I must say motortrend comended the gt500 on its balance, performance and appearance but they can not drive for crap! please go to inside line for there first test drive!!! 0-60 in 4 to 4.3 seconds and 1/4 mile at 12.4 these guys actually put out the numbers ford said it would! i know there were weather factors for there test drive but they cant drive either so check it out if you want the real numbers.
Click to expand...

2010 Ford Shelby GT500 Follow-Up Test and Video on Inside Line

heres the link
 

Zippeh

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
691
0
16
North New Jersey
Apr 7, 2009
#8
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #8
kyle_99gt said:
2010 Ford Shelby GT500 Follow-Up Test and Video on Inside Line

heres the link
Click to expand...


Glorious
 
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Apr 7, 2009
#9
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #9
I like this quote from the article in post #7:

but it also makes the Chevrolet Camaro and Dodge Challenger look like weak-ass sissies
Click to expand...
 
R

Razinhell

New Member
May 29, 2004
62
0
0
Apr 7, 2009
#10
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #10
fox1x said:
I like this quote from the article in post #7:
Click to expand...

Yeah i don't understand including the Camaro SS with the GT500 and Challenger SRT-8 when it is not sold as a comparable car to either. I think the Challenger SRT-8 is hitting around $43K MSRP, while the GT500 will be around $48K and the Camaro SS is $31. What the article does show is that Dodge really needs to look at their SRT brand and start making them competitive or they will be left behind. The Camaro Z28 may possibly make its way out and supposedly is the performance halo of the Camaro lineup, but we'll see if GM is even around.

Either way the GT500 is beautiful in every way!
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
Apr 7, 2009
#11
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #11
I should have known they would have to eventually improve on the GT500. I should have known it would be when I could have saved, passed on the '06 GT and had that baby.

But nooooooo.....had to have it now.

I'm jealous of my buddy getting one in a few weeks (or days maybe)
 
S

SGILLHAM03cobra

New Member
Jun 8, 2006
18
0
0
Apr 7, 2009
#12
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #12
motortrend

Thanx kyle99GT for posting the link!!! guh motortrend frustrates me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
SOLD Airaid SynthaMax reuseable conical air filter 10-14 Shelby GT500 $70.00
  • Cman
  • Oct 17, 2021
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
1K
Engine and Power Adder May 26, 2022
Cman
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Fox Battery relocation other than in the back??
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Jan 30, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2022
Bill95
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?