• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FMS Mini Starter Vs. DB Electrical Mini

  • Thread starter Thread starter giddyup306
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2011

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 3, 2011
#1
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • #1
Ford Racing M-11000MT164 - Ford Racing Starters - Overview - SummitRacing.com

These mini high-torque starters from Ford Racing are a great addition to your car. They feature a high-output motor with internal gear reduction that provides more cranking power than stock, yet is 30 percent smaller. Their smaller size brings the weight down 5 lbs. from OE starters and provides a great deal more header clearance. These are the perfect starters for vehicles with high-compression engines and tight-fitting headers. Instructions and special battery cables are included, but you must use a firewall solenoid.
Click to expand...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/High...ptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

Overall length from the mounting flange to the end of the starter is
6.25 inches to allow for header clearence!
Click to expand...
This starter will replace older 4 inch and 4-1/2 inch 9 tooth bendix gear starters
providing a 50% weight reduction and requiring less cranking amps while
cranking with twice the torque!
Click to expand...

I was just wondering what the exact difference is between these starters. I read a bunch of reviews from DB and the all seemed pretty good, but I ran across this one.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/788399-high-torque-mini-starter-question.html

I don't know if he got a bad unit, or if it was operator error. It doesn't specify in the OP, but the other person said "flywheel" which leads me to believe that he has a manual trans, which requires a kit.

I know more times than not you get what you pay for, but I can't see spending $250 for a freaking starter.

For the price, I think I'll go with the Ebay unit. Right now I just need a starter to dyno. If I have any problems with it grinding, I'll just return it since it has a year warranty.

Just wondering if anyone has any opinions on either of these.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 3, 2011
#2
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • #2
autozone 92 mustang starter for a 5.0 auto is whats in the race car... it turns over a 440" 14:1 small block. it fits in between an RDI block with yates SC1's and a set of 2- 2.25 stepped headers with a 4 inch collector...

no need for one of those over priced things
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 3, 2011
#3
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • #3
The second one I posted is 45 bux. It's half the price of the cheap az unit.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 3, 2011
#4
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • #4
not sure how much id trust an ebay starter... weve had better luck with this AZ starter then the napa gold on it before.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Feb 3, 2011
#5
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • #5
Ford put the mini starter on the mustang for 1992 and 1993. The ford racing starter is an oem 92/93 starter. They reference it bein smaller and more high torque than the earlier pre-92 starter.

So those two starters, plus an autozone 92/93 starter are the same thing. Get whichever one you trust mOre.

If you put them on an 87-91, you need to do sOmenslight rewiring.

I will say the 92/93 starter does sound cooler than then pre-92 starter
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 4, 2011
#6
  • Feb 4, 2011
  • #6
Thanks guys! You just saved me $200!

The only reason why I looked at the FMS starter is because that as the one that Kooks said to run. I guess the word "motorsport" is a selling point because that starter came stock on many vehicles like trucks after 92.

$50 eBay starter FTW!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
91
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
160
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Starters suck. So does the aftermarket!
  • Blue Thunder
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 13, 2024
Blue Thunder
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
B
SN94 5.0L
  • BenSN94
  • Jun 30, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
635
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 1, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?