Ford Motorsports Subframes

#21
LaserSVT said:
Harsh mang:nonono: Do you work for MM?:D Sounds like you dont like factory performance parts from Ford:shrug: I know the MM's are good and have used them SEVERAL times before. It looked like I could not remove the brace to drop the tranny once the MM were welded in, but after looking at the picture and seeing where the bolts are located I guess I will order another one. I sold it for $120, so I am only out the gas money to go get another one at Late Model.
Click to expand...

just order the MM subframes from StangSuspension.com

....... MM products are the best.... Those Ford Subframes you can bend with your own to hands.
 
#22
SRT Handz said:
just order the MM subframes from StangSuspension.com

....... MM products are the best.... Those Ford Subframes you can bend with your own to hands.
Click to expand...

$114 at stangsuspension plus $30 for shipping or $118 at Late Model and $12 for gas:shrug: I dont mind the drive and I like the people at 50Resto.
 
#23
The Ford ones are fine, I had a buddy who bought them and worked well. And actually, there is another company better than MM. Griggs Racing, they engineered and designed all of the parts MM uses.
 
#27
EPIKGT said:
Griggs stuff is good for racing, but it isnt as durable as MM's parts when it comes to street driving...Not too sure about there SFC's though?
Click to expand...

Just debating here

I have seen many cars run Griggs on the street and never have a problem, except too good of handling in a car, lol. With that said, listen to what you said the stuff is good enough for racing, but not street driving. Griggs was designed on some of the most grueling road courses known to man. Where do you think MM sniped, I mean got the idea for their parts, :D .
 
#28
Zax said:
Just debating here

I have seen many cars run Griggs on the street and never have a problem, except too good of handling in a car, lol. With that said, listen to what you said the stuff is good enough for racing, but not street driving. Griggs was designed on some of the most grueling road courses known to man. Where do you think MM sniped, I mean got the idea for their parts, :D .
Click to expand...

Your right about there parts standing up to track abuse, but those tracks dont have large bumps, road hazards, & pot holes that can crack a K member etc....

Some of mm's part are the same, but some are different..One thing I like that Griggs has, but not MM is the front SLA setup....
 
#29
Thats why they put a lifetime guarantee on it. And advertise it as daily driver to track use. I have never heard of one cracking, and I have had 3 friends use them (lucky bastards).
 
#32
Zax said:
Thats why they put a lifetime guarantee on it. And advertise it as daily driver to track use. I have never heard of one cracking, and I have had 3 friends use them (lucky bastards).
Click to expand...

Im not gonna go back & 4th with u about this, but i have heard quite a few times b4 that griggs stuff isnt designed 4 street use....Im sure griggs stuff is quality, & its race proven, so its good stuff...I personally prefer MM though...
 
#33
#34
Zax said:
Just debating here

I have seen many cars run Griggs on the street and neever have a problem, except too good of handling in a car, lol. With that said, listen to what you said the stuff is good enough for racing, but not street driving. Griggs was designed on some of the most grueling road courses known to man. Where do you think MM sniped, I mean got the idea for their parts, :D .
Click to expand...

EPIKGT said:
Your right about there parts standing up to track abuse, but those tracks dont have large bumps, road hazards, & pot holes that can crack a K member etc....

Some of mm's part are the same, but some are different..One thing I like that Griggs has, but not MM is the front SLA setup....
Click to expand...

it's kind of like comparing bending a piece of metal and hitting it with a hammer
 
#38
Track Vs Street in rigidity

MM's (hammer analogy) are great for jounces, jarring, pot holes, almost anything you can throw at them because they are built thicker/stronger. You know when you buy an MM product because the only thing that will wear down will be the bushings.

Griggs (bending analogy) are built for lightest weight/as strong as it can be
 
#40
Was a real good debate, I would still build mine with Griggs anyday over MM. I guess I am partial, I used to live real close to the area MM is at, and I just know how they got their start. They used to be a Griggs technology part for half the price, you know to help the little guy out. But then they became this big company that made semi-equal quality parts to Griggs and charged an arm and a leg. And, when you buy Griggs parts you get an actual warranty. The performance shop I used in SoCal for years used MM parts untill they ramped the prices up, then they just started using Griggs since the prices were so close. Many strret cars that could afford it used Griggs, and there were never any issues. The parts held up just as long if not longer than those from MM. Epik, arent you real close to MM in SLO, Ca?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
rednotch
rednotch
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
Replies
7
Views
376
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Noobz347
Noobz347
skian00
SF Bay Area Fox Mustang Shop Recommendations
Replies
0
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
skian00
skian00
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
Replies
2
Views
269
What is it Worth?!?!?
riored97snake
R
PonyGTrider
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
PonyGTrider
PonyGTrider
Top Bottom
Back
Forums
Menu