• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FORD RACING E303 AND CRANE 1.7 ROCKERS

  • Thread starter Thread starter STANGNEWGUY
  • Start date Start date Feb 10, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
P

patrickmx2

New Member
Jul 25, 2007
32
0
0
Near Memphis TN
Feb 12, 2008
#21
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #21
I know that if buying new I'd go AFR most likely. But if the budget is in the $500 range I have just fallen back to a low mileage Explorer engine and maybe upgrade the valve springs depending on the mileage of the engine.

For instance Ford sells a nice crate motor that is set up for a GT40 package that is supposed to make 345 hp and you get a choice of an E or B cam. But look if you look at the numbers on the stangpro site I posted above here you can easily see how the GT40P stacks up and is really close to that.

Here is another thing I noticed.

E303 with 1.6 rockers.
Duration is 220/220 with a .498 lift.

A stock HO cam 89 model with 1.7 rocker
Duration is 218/214 with a .471 lift.

An HO cam gives a much easier car to tune, and rock solid idle and these cams are basically free. The numbers with a 1.7 rocker are not that far from an E303 and a stock ratio of 1.6. The Crane rockers I'm using are the Ford part# used on the Cobra's and so far are super quiet.

I'm looking at it from a "bang for the buck" perspective. I will soon have my car dynoed with the HO cam and if I can find this post I'll update it.


Here is another point. You will see the "Power Heads" in the same site above. Those are very nicely ported E7 Heads. We used a set in two cars back in some class racing we ran locally where we had to run a Production head. Later my friend replaced his Power Heads with some Trick Flow high ports and slowed the car down over 1/2 a second!! He ended up swapping a cam, having port work done, and a new torque converter installed just to get the car to run 2 tenths quicker than when he started out! Add that up and he spent a CHUNK of change for 2 tenths and he lost a bunch of driveability compared to his older combination.

This same guy is the crew chief for the current 2 time NMRA Drag Radial World Champion. Those guys always were quick to tear a motor apart and soon after all that class racing they went to NMRA Drag radial.

Its all about getting the combination right. But my combination usually is Budget controlled
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Feb 12, 2008
#22
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #22
patrickmx2 said:
Here is another thing I noticed.

E303 with 1.6 rockers.
Duration is 220/220 with a .498 lift.

A stock HO cam 89 model with 1.7 rocker
Duration is 218/214 with a .471 lift.

An HO cam gives a much easier car to tune, and rock solid idle and these cams are basically free. The numbers with a 1.7 rocker are not that far from an E303 and a stock ratio of 1.6. The Crane rockers I'm using are the Ford part# used on the Cobra's and so far are super quiet.
Click to expand...

One thing your observation misses is that the stock cam has a lobe seperation of 114 or 115, while the E-303 has 110. That changes the characteristic of the cam quite a bit. The E-303 has quite a bit more overlap which is why it sounds meaner at an idle. But yes, the other stats are not a ton different, so it really is not worth it to go with the E-303 IMO.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,032
1,624
194
NJ
Feb 12, 2008
#23
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #23
patrickmx2 said:
Here is another point. You will see the "Power Heads" in the same site above. Those are very nicely ported E7 Heads. We used a set in two cars back in some class racing we ran locally where we had to run a Production head. Later my friend replaced his Power Heads with some Trick Flow high ports and slowed the car down over 1/2 a second!! He ended up swapping a cam, having port work done, and a new torque converter installed just to get the car to run 2 tenths quicker than when he started out! Add that up and he spent a CHUNK of change for 2 tenths and he lost a bunch of driveability compared to his older combination.
Click to expand...

Trick flow high port heads are not a good head for a 302.
He lost power and driveability because it was a messed up combination of parts.
Sounds like he got a deal on some parts, and just stuffed them in the car.

I've seen 347 high port combos run in the 10's NA.
Their a good head, they just aren't good for every type of setup.
 
S

STANGNEWGUY

New Member
Feb 10, 2008
5
0
0
FULTON IL
Feb 13, 2008
#24
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #24
valve springs??

with either cam id like to change the valve springs and possibly update the retainers and locks. does anyone know of a complete kit or parts that work well together?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,032
1,624
194
NJ
Feb 13, 2008
#25
  • Feb 13, 2008
  • #25
If you are going to do valve springs, retainers, and locks, you might as well just use the money on a new set of heads.

Gt40x are good, but not for a grand, if you find a set for 900 or less, i'd use them, either that or get some twisted wedges, or edelbrock rpms. Afr's are good, but they aren't worth any more money than TW's.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
612
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
754
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Y
Engine 1994 Ford Mustang Gt Rod Knock/Stuck Lifter
  • yaboity
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
277
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 8, 2025
AeroCoupe
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
318
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?