• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Ford to bring back the 4 cylinder SVO Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter 85_SS_302_Coupe
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jul 19, 2008
#1
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #1
Ford Mustang SVO: Ford To Bring Mustang SVO Badge Back For 2010 With 300 HP Eco-Boosted Four-Cylinder
 

glowstang93

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 9, 2003
853
8
39
Illinois
Jul 19, 2008
#2
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #2
MMm, why not 2009 please .

I would love to be able to get a new mustang next year with some decent fuel economy. Thats one of the things I love so much about mine.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 19, 2008
#3
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #3
But they aren't calling it an SVO.

They are calling it a GTS.




I don't understand Ford sometimes. They are big on namplate heritage. It's the reason why they brought back the Ford taurus name....and yet that can't keep models consistent. The GTS is a stripped down GT...what the bulllitt should be called technically.

Their new 4-banger turbo should be SVO. But then again, SVO was the precursor to SVT and no longer exists.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Jul 19, 2008
#4
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #4
sounds pretty cool if its unique...not just "cheaper looking" like a v6 stang is
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jul 19, 2008
#5
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #5
Not going to happen.
 
M

Makdaddymac

New Member
May 28, 2005
323
1
0
orlando
Jul 20, 2008
#6
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #6
"not going to happen":::

why not, i would respect it man, better fuel economy,even though by then 20-25mpg is going to be like getting 8-10mpg now..... but still the stang needs somerthing to play wiht the camaros release........
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,357
208
114
Ohio
Jul 20, 2008
#7
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #7
I think the current car is just too heavy to be sporting a 4 Cylinder.
 

LiquidGT

Member
Oct 8, 2007
368
0
16
Near STL hell
Jul 20, 2008
#8
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #8
^They said its supposed to be 500 lbs lighter than the GT, we'll see. But you got to remember that the GT is lighter than the pig GT500.

Couldn't they find a better name than "Eco-Boost".
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Jul 20, 2008
#9
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #9
LiquidGT said:
Couldn't they find a better name than "Eco-Boost".
Click to expand...
lol Seriously.

I like that this car will be based on the new redesigned Mustang.
 

hsean

10 Year Member
Jul 24, 2006
656
69
69
dearborn,michigan
Jul 20, 2008
#10
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #10
ill advised said:
lol Seriously.

I like that this car will be based on the new redesigned Mustang.
Click to expand...

i work in prototype and i have built the new mustang and you guys won't be disappointed.
 

hsean

10 Year Member
Jul 24, 2006
656
69
69
dearborn,michigan
Jul 20, 2008
#11
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #11
hsean said:
i work in prototype and i have built the new mustang and you guys won't be disappointed.
Click to expand...

i don't know anything about a four cylinder turbo setup though but that would be great,i hope fords goes through with this.
 

magnj

New Member
May 30, 2007
139
0
0
Jul 20, 2008
#12
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #12
If they can shave the claimed 500 lbs and make 300hp with a tt i4, I'd drive the **** out of it...of course I'd still have my fox
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jul 21, 2008
#13
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #13
I'd buy it as a DD in a heartbeat! I love the new s197's!
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Jul 21, 2008
#14
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #14
Good idea with the gas prices and all. Why not just add a turbo/SC to the 6 cylinder.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 21, 2008
#15
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #15
GTOreturns said:
Good idea with the gas prices and all. Why not just add a turbo/SC to the 6 cylinder.
Click to expand...

I think the goal with the Eco-Boost is to get better performance AND fuel economy. Adding boost to the 6 would just make it suck gas like the 8. That and the Eco-Boost uses direct injection technology and overall is a complete different animal, IIRC.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Jul 21, 2008
#16
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #16
I like the sounds of it...RWD is nearly useless here in the winter though
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jul 21, 2008
#17
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #17
If they manage to drop a considerable amount of weight and make 300hp, and still keep it affordable, it'll be an instant classic. Unfortunately their history shows that models like this are usually over priced and sold as specialty cars and people just don't buy them.


Look at the Merkurs...they were fantastic cars, but marketing/dealership involvement/price killed it before it could really take off. The SVOs were great cars too but the price just didn't make them competitive.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Jul 21, 2008
#18
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #18
They're not much heavier than the TurboCoupes were...sporting a 4-cylinder...It'll happen...
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Jul 21, 2008
#19
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #19
GTOreturns said:
Good idea with the gas prices and all. Why not just add a turbo/SC to the 6 cylinder.
Click to expand...
Believe it or not, my '04 V6 gets barely better mpg than my 5.0 Capri.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jul 21, 2008
#20
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #20
samickguy15 said:
They're not much heavier than the TurboCoupes were...sporting a 4-cylinder...It'll happen...
Click to expand...

Yeah that's true...if they can get them down to about 3200lbs or so it wouldn't be so bad. I think i read though that Ford already went to great lengths to make the new Mustang as light as they could so i don't know how much lighter it can be aside from just having a lighter engine.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
For Sale 2003 White Ford Mustang Convertible For Sale $7,000
  • LemonStealingHorse
  • May 6, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
135
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 6, 2026
LemonStealingHorse
L
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
203
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
138
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
F
1990 mustang GT, essentials to making a 5,000 mile round trip (Michigan to California, and back)
  • FreeMustangProject
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
950
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 14, 2025
hoopty5.0
H
1981 2.3 4 speed to 5.0 5 speed help
  • Hollowfox
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
246
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?