• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Fox body springs installed...before and after pics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryan02Stang
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#1
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #1
I got my fox body springs in this weekend. 4cyl springs in front and V8 springs in rear cut 1/4 coil. drop was about 1.5 inches in front and 1 inch in back. took it out to test handling....around turns its the same as stock, felt identical to stock all the way up to about 110, i didnt want to go any faster. When I launch the front end comes up a LOT more than stock, also when I downshift into second geara and go full throttle the front end flys right up. Only complaint would be slightly more nose dive when braking hard. They should settle a little, theyve only been on less than one day. Heres pics...

First pic is before...second is after...sorry for poor quality pic was taken with my phone, i will post better pics later.


 

Attachments

  • cruise20.webp
    38.5 KB · Views: 591
  • 07-02-04_1908.webp
    16.6 KB · Views: 571

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Jul 4, 2004
#2
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #2
so i guess you like the 4*4 look?

i dunno wut to think...
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#3
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #3
Another after pic

 

Attachments

  • 07-02-04_1909.webp
    17.4 KB · Views: 543

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#4
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #4
yellow5.0cobra said:
so i guess you like the 4*4 look?

i dunno wut to think...
Click to expand...


I'm not willing to lose traction to lower my car. I think it dropped nicely and has better weight transfer than stock.
 

yellow5.0cobra

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2002
2,849
0
0
In the garage, On the floor.
Jul 4, 2004
#5
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #5
ok ok u mixed it up before...

the AFTER pic looks much better.

you edited your mistake.

=)
 

Tylerb59

Banned
Mar 7, 2003
1,895
0
0
Arlington, WA
Jul 4, 2004
#6
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #6
Looks awesome.

That's a stunning car. Absolutely beautiful color.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#7
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #7
Thanks Tyler!
 

dub_c39

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
126
0
0
Ohio
Jul 4, 2004
#8
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #8
That looks great!
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jul 4, 2004
#9
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #9
Nice Ryan. Finally someone who doesn't slam it down into the weeds.
RE: Weight transfer - I guess that's the tradeoff you get - if you want the weight transfer for takeoffs, you're also gonna get it when braking as well. Maybe some better struts would help this?
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#10
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #10
twogts4us said:
Nice Ryan. Finally someone who doesn't slam it down into the weeds.
RE: Weight transfer - I guess that's the tradeoff you get - if you want the weight transfer for takeoffs, you're also gonna get it when braking as well. Maybe some better struts would help this?
Click to expand...
Yeah...I am getting Strange 10 way adjustable struts. So hopefully when set for street driving they help that out. If not, its really not that bad.
 

flappy3

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
56
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#11
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #11
I've been looking forward to your pics. Looks great! I posted a question about fox springs last week, and I think you helped me decide. Fox springs it is.
 

Teen'93stang5.0

Founding Member
May 26, 2002
3,560
5
78
813
Jul 4, 2004
#12
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #12
stock fox springs? or aftermarket lowering fox springs?

if thats stock then i just figured out how to put my car down on its proverbial "nuts"
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#13
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #13
Teen'93stang5.0 said:
stock fox springs? or aftermarket lowering fox springs?

if thats stock then i just figured out how to put my car down on its proverbial "nuts"
Click to expand...
They are stock fox body springs.
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jul 4, 2004
#14
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #14
Teen'93stang5.0 said:
stock fox springs? or aftermarket lowering fox springs?

if thats stock then i just figured out how to put my car down on its proverbial "nuts"
Click to expand...

The lowering springs are for all '79 to '04 coupe(except '99+ cobra's),and different part # lowering springs are for the '79 to '04 convertables(except '99+ cobra's)

Nothing on the suspension end of it is different through out these years.Still the same spring set up style,and rear four link control arm set up!!

Just the ride height got taller once the sn95's hit production .
 
Y

Yanos

New Member
Jun 5, 2004
28
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#15
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #15
You guys seam to talk about a much improved front-to-back weight transfer with a close to stock lateral weight transfer. How can this be possible? Won't a 99+ GT with fox body springs litterally handles like a boat? It's relatively heavier than a fox body stang.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#16
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #16
Yanos said:
You guys seam to talk about a much improved front-to-back weight transfer with a close to stock lateral weight transfer. How can this be possible? Won't a 99+ GT with fox body springs litterally handles like a boat? It's relatively heavier than a fox body stang.
Click to expand...
My car handles identical to stock.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 4, 2004
#17
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #17
Here is some better after pics...


 

Attachments

  • after123.webp
    47.1 KB · Views: 648
  • after134.webp
    39.5 KB · Views: 477
Y

Yanos

New Member
Jun 5, 2004
28
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#18
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #18
Ryan02Stang said:
My car handles identical to stock.
Click to expand...
Isn't the suspension alot softer with more body roll?
 
Y

Yanos

New Member
Jun 5, 2004
28
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#19
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #19
Ryan02Stang said:
Here is some better after pics...


Click to expand...
Do you have a better side shot? Thanks!
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jul 4, 2004
#20
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #20
In those pics,it actually looks like a stock fox body ride height.Which doesn't look bad on the newer style body.It really shows how tall our cars are !!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
895
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
471
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Suspension 87 steering wheel slightly wobbles after new Rag joint install
  • R82148V
  • Jun 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
972
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 24, 2025
R82148V
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?