• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox owners running E85. Information, set ups, websites.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangOwner
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2007
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Jul 17, 2007
#1
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys, i'm doing a engine rebuild right now i thought i might considering doing a tune so i could run E85 and 93 octane. Does anybody have any information on doing a E85 conversion? Any websites or techs? I recently read the new 5.0 mustang mag and saw gains of around 20 rwhp and thought that it would be worth it. Its also kinda different to be running E85. Does anybody on this site have a fox running on E85? Worth it? Thanks
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,224
17,909
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2007
#2
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #2
Found this

http://www.change2e85.com/servlet/StoreFront


$500

I don't think you'd get a HP gain though. E85 actually produces slightly less energy than gasoline. It also requires slightly higher compression. I don't beleive you can design a system that will let you swap from 93 octane to E85 with the flip of the switch. I've also heard you need to retrofit your entire fuel system to run it correctly.

My general understanding was that it's not worth it to retrofit.
 

mustangjoe87

Member
Jul 23, 2004
364
0
16
Harrison Twp., Michigan
Jul 17, 2007
#3
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #3
E85 has a really high octane rating, but you will see poorer fuel economy and a lot of parts would need to be changed since the fuel has conductive properties.
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Jul 17, 2007
#4
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #4
Mustang5L5 said:
Found this

http://www.change2e85.com/servlet/StoreFront


$500

I don't think you'd get a HP gain though. E85 actually produces slightly less energy than gasoline. It also requires slightly higher compression. I don't beleive you can design a system that will let you swap from 93 octane to E85 with the flip of the switch. I've also heard you need to retrofit your entire fuel system to run it correctly.

My general understanding was that it's not worth it to retrofit.
Click to expand...

Read the new issue of 5.0 Mustang and they did a dyno tune with E85 over 93 and it made 20 hp more. They also had a switch so you could switch back and forth between E85 and 93 octane. Yes it produces less energy and you need to upgrade your fuel system to flow 50% more...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,224
17,909
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2007
#5
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #5
I have that issue rightg here. I'll have to give it a read
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,224
17,909
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2007
#6
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #6
Their test car is an '04 CObra. That makes a big difference.

Stated in the 2nd paragraph is why this car made 20 more HP. E85 has a higher octane, thus allowing a boosted car to dial in more aggressive tune considering the cobra has lower compression to begin with.

It would be like running 116 octane all the time and having a chip burned with a toggle with a custom race tune.

COnsidering the cost of the conversion, it may be cheaper to go that route and run 116 octane. You won't see 20rwHP with a naturally aspirated setup. E85 might allow you to get more aggressive, but you can only take N/A so far.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jul 17, 2007
#7
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #7
The lower the octane the more power so long as your not detonating...
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Jul 17, 2007
#8
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #8
did a guy just do this with a fox?

seem to recall he didnt have to change a thing other than the tune. and he picked up about 15 more horse N/A on a stroker engine.

was like last week i think.

*EDIT* here is the link http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=826071&highlight=E85
 
M

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Jul 18, 2007
#9
  • Jul 18, 2007
  • #9
Mustang5L5 said:
Their test car is an '04 CObra. That makes a big difference.

Stated in the 2nd paragraph is why this car made 20 more HP. E85 has a higher octane, thus allowing a boosted car to dial in more aggressive tune considering the cobra has lower compression to begin with.

It would be like running 116 octane all the time and having a chip burned with a toggle with a custom race tune.
COnsidering the cost of the conversion, it may be cheaper to go that route and run 116 octane. You won't see 20rwHP with a naturally aspirated setup. E85 might allow you to get more aggressive, but you can only take N/A so far.
Click to expand...

Okay then you dont' know my Engine setup. My 5.0 is a forged 306, lowered 9.0:1 comp. Running Vortech V-1 S-trim Blower with 10-12 lbs of boost. Running the higher octane will allow me to run more boost and timing. For instance i could run 13-15 lbs of boost. Thus a ton more hp.... My car is recieving a custom tune with 2 options. While i'm doing the engine i thought it might be worth doing a E85 setup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
780
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?