• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Front Brakes Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter PonyGTrider
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2021
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#1
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #1
Hi All,
I have this issue/question about my front brake pads. My ride is a '90 GT with the '01 bullitt mustang brakes upgrade. Looking at the disc wear or the pads contact it seems like the pads are too narrow and more disc surface could be effectively used. It seems that the performance set of Hawk pads are wider than the stock ones, is that real? Or are there any other good wider pads I can use to add more braking power?
 

Attachments

  • A05EF5D0-9998-4062-8750-13EA6CA49B7A.webp
    249.9 KB · Views: 234
  • 5AE5AAA3-B1D8-4607-9BEC-39521E975EC6.webp
    362.9 KB · Views: 142
  • BA66F75C-2F15-4AA8-87B1-4FAF38640361.webp
    376 KB · Views: 120

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Jul 28, 2021
#2
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #2
I have 3 foxbody mustangs all with 5 lug and cobra brake conversions. They all look the same as yours as far as pad surface contact. I think it is just the way they were designed. I have not experienced any pads having a different contact area than stock. For me the best pads I have used are factory ford pads.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#3
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #3
Mstng93SSP said:
I have 3 foxbody mustangs all with 5 lug and cobra brake conversions. They all look the same as yours as far as pad surface contact. I think it is just the way they were designed. I have not experienced any pads having a different contact area than stock. For me the best pads I have used are factory ford pads.
Click to expand...
Oh by the way and sorry about my indiscretion and since you have more experience on this topic, will you share what master cylinder are you using with your upgrades? I have a ’95 mustang V6/GT master cylinder. Pedal feel is good but seems I don't have enough clamping force and it stops but I could use a better brake power, or if you have manual brakes again what MC?
Thank you in advance
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Jul 28, 2021
#4
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #4
What brake booster are you using? If you have stock foxbody booster that is your issue. You need a 93 cobra booster or a 94/95 booster. A stock foxbody booster will give you a hard pedal. The master cylinder you are using is fine.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#5
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #5
Mstng93SSP said:
What brake booster are you using? If you have stock foxbody booster that is your issue. You need a 93 cobra booster or a 94/95 booster. A stock foxbody booster will give you a hard pedal. The master cylinder you are using is fine.
Click to expand...
By God that don’t remember, I want to say that it is 94/95 but I did upgraded it.
Maybe I was expecting much more better stopping power.
This is the BB I have…
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Jul 28, 2021
#6
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #6
Yeah, it looks like a 94/95 booster. Should be fine.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#7
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #7
Ok,
Well I guess i had higher expectations but probably my brakes are working the best they can. For the rest of the system I have a Willwood proportioning valve for the rear and front ’99-’02 Mustang Cobra Goodridge G-Stop Braided lines, So I guess is just me demanding more

I thank you for overviewing my set up
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Jul 28, 2021
#8
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #8
What pads are you running? You have all the needed components of the brake system, so the only variable that is left is the pads themselves. Yes, performance pads will provide better "bite" over the stock ceramic pads since they are more focused on less dust than stopping power.
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#9
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #9
Right now I have some cheap Akebono ceramic pads, But to be fair before this set I had the Hawk Performance Ceramic Brake Pads; Front Pair (94-04 Cobra, Bullitt, Mach 1) and frankly they were no that much better than this last set, the biggest difference was that those Hawk pads didn't brake too good when cold and just a hair better than the Akebono when warm/hot. That's Why I posted this thread because I felt something was going on with my conversion, and needed some opinions

Truly appreciate your time and suggestions. Thank you
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,801
903
143
Jul 28, 2021
#10
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #10
What brakes do you have on the rear? Disc or drum? If disc, what size rotor and what caliper using?

Rear brakes can make the system feel not as strong as you are expecting if undersized. Only asking because you didn't mention.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#11
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #11
KRUISR said:
What brakes do you have on the rear? Disc or drum? If disc, what size rotor and what caliper using?

Rear brakes can make the system feel not as strong as you are expecting if undersized. Only asking because you didn't mention.
Click to expand...
I have the full brakes kit from 2001 Special Edition Mustang Bullitt kit, front 13" diameter and rear 11.650" diameter. Rear BIAS adjusted via Willwood proportioning valve.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
356
203
63
United States
Jul 28, 2021
#12
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #12
My 1992 Mustang GT autocross car has 03/04 Cobra 13" front brakes, 11.65" rear brakes, a 1993 Cobra MC, the OEM 1992 GT brake booster, braided SS front and center brake lines, and an SSBC proportioning valve. With Hawk HP-Plus pads up front, and Hawk HPS pads in the rear, the car stops really well. The brakes have great initial bite, and a good consistent feel. Brake pads make a big difference, and they are often a personal choice based on driving style. Are you using the car for performance driving? Or just street use? Are you concerned about brake dust/noise? The HP-Plus pads give off a LOT of dust, and squeal a bit on the street. Have you tried bleeding the brakes again to see if that makes a difference?
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 28, 2021
#13
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #13
Thanks for sharing your set up. I will try some other pads and see if have a better feeling. Yes the bleeding process as well as system flush and fluid replacement is performed routinely thru speed bleeders. I’m positive there is no air in the system, no spongy pedal. Just not too impressed with the system performance… Again, maybe it is just me
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Jul 28, 2021
#14
  • Jul 28, 2021
  • #14
I have 04 cobra rear, 04 cobra front brakes, 93 cobra booster, 98 master, gutted 98 prop valve, wildwood prop valve for bias. The brakes on my car would not lock up. The first thing I noticed was the front cobra pads had worn a ridge in the caliper bracket causing the inside pad to lock up. After that my cam was only pulling 8lbs of vacuum at idle. Not enough for the booster after a couple braking events. Ended up using a Chevy cruze vacuum pump, relay, vacuum switch, and check valves. ( pulled from local JY- pretty much self contained ). My car is turbocharged and stops very well now. Pump keeps the booster vacuumed down and cuts on whenever booster vacuum drops below 12in.hg. with my hybrid electric power steering and the vacuum pump moving the car around without starting it is a breeze.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 29, 2021
#15
  • Jul 29, 2021
  • #15
90sickfox said:
I have 04 cobra rear, 04 cobra front brakes, 93 cobra booster, 98 master, gutted 98 prop valve, wildwood prop valve for bias. The brakes on my car would not lock up. The first thing I noticed was the front cobra pads had worn a ridge in the caliper bracket causing the inside pad to lock up. After that my cam was only pulling 8lbs of vacuum at idle. Not enough for the booster after a couple braking events. Ended up using a Chevy cruze vacuum pump, relay, vacuum switch, and check valves. ( pulled from local JY- pretty much self contained ). My car is turbocharged and stops very well now. Pump keeps the booster vacuumed down and cuts on whenever booster vacuum drops below 12in.hg. with my hybrid electric power steering and the vacuum pump moving the car around without starting it is a breeze.
Click to expand...
Well thanks for sharing your story, man once we start modifying things around reach some ugly situations but that’s they way it goes sometimes. Good thing you’re finding solutions to those headaches. My driving is just streets and some long trips, and just like I said I guess I was expecting more from this upgrade. Good luck
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,178
17,880
224
Massachusetts
Jul 29, 2021
#16
  • Jul 29, 2021
  • #16
This question comes up quite frequently actually.

The 94-04 Cobra PBR was initially designed back in the 80's to be used on a 12" rotor. GM then used it on a 13" rotor along with Ford. SO the lack of full swept contact area is an artifact of the design being that it was originally intended for a smaller brake package.

PBR later updated these calipers to the style found on the C5 and C6 corvette. They used the same pistons, but allowed for a pad with a MUCH larger contact patch area for the 13.4" rotor. I actually have a set of these on my car because the lack of pad area on the cobra calipers drove me nuts.

Brakes - Rotor size question

Mounted up calipers and rotors today, looking at the coverage of the pad on the rotor face it looks like width of the face is made for a bigger/wider pad or setup? Everything mounted up correctly, but just concerned about the amount of rotor not being used /touched. Triple checking part #s...
www.stangnet.com

PonyGTrider said:
I have a ’95 mustang V6/GT master cylinder. Pedal feel is good but seems I don't have enough clamping force and it stops but I could use a better brake power, or if you have manual brakes again what MC?
Click to expand...

That's the wrong MC for that setup. The bore is too large meaning you need to put more leg effort into it. Swap to a 1993 Cobra MC with a 1" bore and I guarantee you the braking performance will improve significantly


I ran that exact setup for years in a few different forms. I was never a fan of Hawk Pads, so i ran Motorcraft pads (and later the stock AC delco pads in the corvette calipers) and had very impressive braking performance for the street. I barely have to use any pedal to get the car to stop.
 
Last edited: Jul 29, 2021
Reactions: PonyGTrider and 90sickfox

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 29, 2021
#17
  • Jul 29, 2021
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
This question comes up quite frequently actually.

The 94-04 Cobra PBR was initially designed back in the 80's to be used on a 12" rotor. GM then used it on a 13" rotor along with Ford. SO the lack of full swept contact area is an artifact of the design being that it was originally intended for a smaller brake package.

PBR later updated these calipers to the style found on the C5 and C6 corvette. They used the same pistons, but allowed for a pad with a MUCH larger contact patch area for the 13.4" rotor. I actually have a set of these on my car because the lack of pad area on the cobra calipers drove me nuts.

Brakes - Rotor size question

Mounted up calipers and rotors today, looking at the coverage of the pad on the rotor face it looks like width of the face is made for a bigger/wider pad or setup? Everything mounted up correctly, but just concerned about the amount of rotor not being used /touched. Triple checking part #s...
www.stangnet.com



That's the wrong MC for that setup. The bore is too large meaning you need to put more leg effort into it. Swap to a 1993 Cobra MC with a 1" bore and I guarantee you the braking performance will improve significantly


I ran that exact setup for years in a few different forms. I was never a fan of Hawk Pads, so i ran Motorcraft pads (and later the stock AC delco pads in the corvette calipers) and had very impressive braking performance for the street. I barely have to use any pedal to get the car to stop.
Click to expand...
Well that's a nice information you shared right there. I will look into the 1 inch bore MC, you might be right about that. My set up was put together following an article but could be the wrong combination. So I'll find out if a new MC makes a good positive difference.

Thank again a bunch for sharing
 

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 30, 2021
#18
  • Jul 30, 2021
  • #18
Mustang5L5 said:
This question comes up quite frequently actually.

The 94-04 Cobra PBR was initially designed back in the 80's to be used on a 12" rotor. GM then used it on a 13" rotor along with Ford. SO the lack of full swept contact area is an artifact of the design being that it was originally intended for a smaller brake package.

PBR later updated these calipers to the style found on the C5 and C6 corvette. They used the same pistons, but allowed for a pad with a MUCH larger contact patch area for the 13.4" rotor. I actually have a set of these on my car because the lack of pad area on the cobra calipers drove me nuts.

Brakes - Rotor size question

Mounted up calipers and rotors today, looking at the coverage of the pad on the rotor face it looks like width of the face is made for a bigger/wider pad or setup? Everything mounted up correctly, but just concerned about the amount of rotor not being used /touched. Triple checking part #s...
www.stangnet.com



That's the wrong MC for that setup. The bore is too large meaning you need to put more leg effort into it. Swap to a 1993 Cobra MC with a 1" bore and I guarantee you the braking performance will improve significantly


I ran that exact setup for years in a few different forms. I was never a fan of Hawk Pads, so i ran Motorcraft pads (and later the stock AC delco pads in the corvette calipers) and had very impressive braking performance for the street. I barely have to use any pedal to get the car to stop.
Click to expand...
I was reading your threads on this subject and have to throw this question: Is it possible or have you ever tried to fit the front Cobra or Bullitt calipers with the C5, C6, or GTO brake pads for more braking surface area? I would be interesting to know about that possibility. Wouldn't that be great???
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,178
17,880
224
Massachusetts
Jul 30, 2021
#19
  • Jul 30, 2021
  • #19
The pads don’t interchange. The design of the calipers is different. The cobra calipers are a pad guided design where the pad is wedged into the abutment bracket and the caliper clips to the pads. The corvette style are pin guided calipers where the pads are also wedged onto the pad bracket but the caliper rides on two libricated pins and doesn’t physically connect to the pads. The pad area is dramatically different too.

unfortunately you are limited to the cobra style pad here
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Jul 30, 2021
#20
  • Jul 30, 2021
  • #20
Mustang5L5 said:
The pads don’t interchange. The design of the calipers is different. The cobra calipers are a pad guided design where the pad is wedged into the abutment bracket and the caliper clips to the pads. The corvette style are pin guided calipers where the pads are also wedged onto the pad bracket but the caliper rides on two libricated pins and doesn’t physically connect to the pads. The pad area is dramatically different too.

unfortunately you are limited to the cobra style pad here
Click to expand...
Oh, well at least I tried it
Thank you for answering my question.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
274
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
K
Stupid Brakes Question
  • KirkACola
  • Jun 3, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
104
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jun 3, 2025
KirkACola
K
J
2003 convertible front brakes sticking
  • jamesbanasky
  • Jul 9, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
273
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 6, 2025
jamesbanasky
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?