• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

gas mileage revisited

  • Thread starter Thread starter fivespeedsteed
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Oct 17, 2006
#21
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #21
I was making the same point about recording gallons of gas used over a distance also?
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
Oct 17, 2006
#22
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #22
yeah i was kidding about the paint thing. thanks guys. keep goin if you can.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Oct 17, 2006
#23
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #23
Acutally if the body of a car was perfectly smooth and slippery it would get better gas mileage than a car with lots of dents, rought paint.

And I mean better gas mileage over the course of, say, 3000 miles cross country...
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Oct 17, 2006
#24
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #24
Well I did an 1200 mile round trip this past weekend.

I averaged about 23mpg. average speed was ~65-70mph. And using the cruise control as much as possible. I also had alot of luggage in the car and a passenger. So maybe add 600lbs.

I was quite happy. getting over 250 for ~10 gallons.
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Oct 17, 2006
#25
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #25
HISSIN50 said:
That's a new one on me. I prefer to use what the car manufacturer recommends (on the door sticker, in the owners manual, etc).
Click to expand...

Uuhhh..though that rating is for the factory tires that came on the car. How many of us are running factory tires 15 years later, etc? If the factory rating, for example, is 35psi, and the tires you just bought from Les Schwab or whoever is rated of having a max of 44 psi, do you really want to stick with the manufacturer rating? No, the tires would be underinflated.
 

90

Active Member
Sep 24, 2006
0
1
43
Michigan insane asylum
Oct 17, 2006
#26
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #26
i dont understand why you guys are talken aero dynamics, on mpg... your sayen waxing your car every day will save you 0.02mpg if anything... lol i just think its funny it was brought up more then once so i had to comment on it... your gonna go through 20 in wax a year to save 5 in gas a year!!!
 

Glaze

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
133
0
0
Gainesville, GA
Oct 18, 2006
#27
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #27
dont forget to polish the antenna, drive with the windows closed, and ac/heater/radio off....

seriously best thing you can do is keep regular maint done and fix any problems that arise.
 

fivespeedsteed

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 17, 2003
748
22
69
Richmond, VA
Oct 18, 2006
#28
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #28
that paint joke got way out of hand.
 

Glaze

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
133
0
0
Gainesville, GA
Oct 18, 2006
#29
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #29
lol..... hey im one of those guys who thinks to himself as hes waxing the car of how much smoother its gonna cut through the air...
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Oct 18, 2006
#30
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #30
I cant believe the horrible mileage people get with a stock stang and gears on the highway its just weird. I had 3:55's and a lead foot and constantly got over 30mpg on the highway. I also inflated my tires according to the door tag like hissin said.
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Oct 18, 2006
#31
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #31
RsStanG1987 said:
I cant believe the horrible mileage people get with a stock stang and gears on the highway its just weird. I had 3:55's and a lead foot and constantly got over 30mpg on the highway. I also inflated my tires according to the door tag like hissin said.
Click to expand...

Thats impressive.

Did you figure your mileage out by diving by the number of gallons?
 
D

dec322

Member
Feb 11, 2006
401
2
16
Bham AL
Oct 18, 2006
#32
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #32
I don't understand how it is possible to get over 30 mpg on the highway. What was the average speed? 50mph?
 
S

speed1972

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
891
0
16
Denver, CO - Buckley AFB
Oct 18, 2006
#33
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #33
I just drove my car back from Florida a couple months ago and I averaged between 20 and 25mg the whole way. I didn't beat on it and it rolled pretty good with all the changes listed below. And for what its worth, I never run the mfg's recommendation. I no longer have 16's (17's now) and I don't run stock touring radials. My tires take 44psi compared to the OEM 35psi. Now that will cause you to get worse mileage and wear out the outsides of the tires prematurely...
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Oct 18, 2006
#34
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #34
sunil6784 said:
Thats impressive.

Did you figure your mileage out by diving by the number of gallons?
Click to expand...
I would start on a completely full tank. Id fill up then set the trip odometer then at the next gas stop i would take the amount of gas it took to fill it divided by the ammount of miles i put on. I went from Orlando to 40 miles into S/c before i filled up. I drove no less the 70 Mph the whole way too.
 
K

klapdout

New Member
Mar 7, 2006
15
0
0
Oct 19, 2006
#35
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #35
jtfairlane said:
Uuhhh..though that rating is for the factory tires that came on the car. How many of us are running factory tires 15 years later, etc? If the factory rating, for example, is 35psi, and the tires you just bought from Les Schwab or whoever is rated of having a max of 44 psi, do you really want to stick with the manufacturer rating? No, the tires would be underinflated.
Click to expand...


no, your overinflating them, that rating is the max pressure for that tire, how does that translate into what you should use??? it doesent

how did (example) bridgestone know every single (example) Expedia S-01 sold would go to a mustang with your vehicle weight/suspension so they could brand them all with the correct tire pressure for you?

use your factory rated tire pressure. adjust as nessicary based on tire wear

here, senmce i know you wont believe my word, here are a few links i grabbed in a fast seach

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=147&currentpage=33
http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/tp/tp2823/systems.htm
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/0208scc_tire_pressure_guide/
http://cars.cartalk.com/content/advice/tirepressure.html
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 19, 2006
#36
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #36
klapdout said:
no, your overinflating them, that rating is the max pressure for that tire, how does that translate into what you should use??? it doesent

how did (example) bridgestone know every single (example) Expedia S-01 sold would go to a mustang with your vehicle weight/suspension so they could brand them all with the correct tire pressure for you?

use your factory rated tire pressure. adjust as nessicary based on tire wear

here, senmce i know you wont believe my word, here are a few links i grabbed in a fast seach

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=147&currentpage=33
http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/tp/tp2823/systems.htm
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/0208scc_tire_pressure_guide/
http://cars.cartalk.com/content/advice/tirepressure.html
Click to expand...

This was my point before.
 
S

speed1972

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
891
0
16
Denver, CO - Buckley AFB
Oct 19, 2006
#37
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #37
You guys are comparing apples and oranges. None of our tires were rated for 44psi 15 years ago. 44psi is the norm now for tires. The tire mfg has increased the rating on their tires so the recommend air pressure is also higher. The standards and the requirements have changed. If you are only running 32psi in your 44psi tires, you are 1, wasting gas because it causes more friction and 2, you are wearing your tires improperly. If you can get proper wear from a tire with only 32psi on this 44psi tire, you obviously have too narrow of a tire for the width of the rim you are using... Do we even need to cross that line? If you are going with auto mfg recommendations, I shouldn't even consider putting 18's on my stang but the reality is nowadays, its possible and a lot of people do it. Same thing goes for lowering, auto mfg says you shouldn't adjust suspension geometry but how many people here actually think they got the fox body right?

Starting pressure should be a couple psi below max and adjust from there.
 
P

postalbunny

Member
Oct 26, 2005
118
0
17
Oct 19, 2006
#38
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #38
Black1987Stang said:
I dont like that way cuz its not 100% accurate unless u completely use every drop in the tank and no ones gonna be running that low on purpose...I like Filling the tank to the top, driving ur distance noting how many miles it was and then fill up the tank up to the top again and noting how many gallons it took to fill it back up...then with that figure u can figure out how far u can go on a 10 gal, 15 gal or w/e fuel tank...Much easier and safer way imo
Click to expand...

You can do the division with how much gas you put in the tank. Just reset your trip odom. and drive it.. next refill do the math /w the miles traveled and the # of gallons you had to fill it all the way back up.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Oct 19, 2006
#39
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #39
for math guys like us....

since there is an x in the equation does that qualify as Algebra?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
2004 Roush - Dome Lights and radio not working
  • Yurei
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
404
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
squeak93
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
719
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
R
Drivetrain Clutch
  • Robman8028
  • Jun 29, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
272
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 2, 2025
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
R
WTB/Trade 1988 GT Convertible manual transmission- Gray with gray leather interior (Tennessee) Can travel anywhere
  • rhart540
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
313
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 18, 2025
rhart540
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?