viperos said:
well, next time you drive in the snow... or any bad weather... just remember what you used to have...
-ABS, 4 wheel disc brakes, computer assisted power curve (very slight, but still there...) really comfortable interior, I could go on, but I think I've made my point...
Well, the first thing I say to that is : Snow + Mustang(of any kind) =
Second, Not that I'm a wonderful driver at all, but ABS is most useful for inexperienced drivers that have a tendency to stomp on the brakes in a critical stop situation. I'm REALLY not that concerned about losing ABS.
Third, maybe it's the "computer assisted power retard" or curve or whatever that keeps our cars general performance down from the Foxes.

I don't think that people would be switching back to A9L's if the SN95 processor is so "superior".
In any case, although better than the Fox interior, our's isn't exactly what I would label a "really comfortable interior" by any means.
Bottom line is, I've weighed the options, and for all the improvements over the Fox the SN95 has, it REALLY does not justify the loss in performance between the models. If I really did not care about performance as much as I do, then MAYBE I would look at it different. I had driven Foxes before, but never owned one, my 95 is my first stang. I wished I had bought a Fox instead, but when I brought it up, everyone said how archaic the Fox was and how I would regret trading down to a dated car. Now owning both I can rightfully say......
It IS a different animal, but in a good way. Much more nimble, quick, and responsive than my 95. Some people complain that the Fox is a "loose" car and that the SN95 is tighter....maybe a little, but not much. Then again, the LX has subframes, so they might help.
I love the SN95, but the Fox ROCKS!!!!!!